Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:28:04.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Analysis of the Competitiveness of Southeastern Fresh Vegetable Crops Using Quadratic Programming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

M. C. Chien
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics Department, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
J. E. Epperson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics Department, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia

Abstract

This study determined the competitive potential of the temperate southeastern U.S. region to produce selected fresh vegetables for the national market. Results indicated that the region may be competitive in the production and marketing of snap beans, cucumbers, bell peppers, and spring tomatoes. The region would also be competitive in the production and marketing of broccoli, summer and fall tomatoes, and spinach, given cost reductions of 10 to 15 percent. Major cost reductions were required for the region to be competitive in the production and interregional marketing of sweet onions in the absence of effective product differentiation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babb, J.H., Epperson, J.E., and Wells, G.J.. An Analysis of the Competitive Position of South Carolina's Fresh Market Tomato Industry. South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 644,1982.Google Scholar
Davis, G.H, and Meyer, G.. “Future of Our Ground Water Supplies”. Water Well Journal, Feb. 1967:3044.Google Scholar
Decoteau, D.R, Dufault, R.J., and Garrett, J.T.. “Development of a Continuous-Supply Produce Availability Model for Site and Regional Production”. HortScience, 23(5)(1988):825.Google Scholar
Geraghty, J.J, Miller, D.W., Leeden, F.V. Der, and Troise, F.L.. Water Atlas of the United States. New York: Water Information Center, Water Research Building, 1973.Google Scholar
Huang, K.S U.S. Demand for Food: A Complete System of Price and Income Effects. U.S.Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin 1714, Washington, DC, 1985.Google Scholar
Kiker, C and Lynne, G.D.. “Agriculture and Water Regulation in the East”. J. Am. Soc. Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, 41(2)(1977):3236.Google Scholar
Kundell, J.E Ground Water Resources of Georgia. Institute of Government, University of Georgia, Athens, 1978.Google Scholar
La Moreaux, P.E. Ground-Water Resources of the South—A Frontier of the Nation's Water Supply. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 441,1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathia, G.A, and Brooker, J.R.. “Relative Profitability of Vine-Ripe Tomatoes in North Carolina and Tennessee”. So. J. Agr. Econ., 9(2)(1977):121127.Google Scholar
Meister, A.D, Heady, E.O., Nicol, K.J., and Strohbehn, R.W.. U.S. Agricultural Production in Relation to Alternative Water, Environmental, and Export Policies. CARD Report 65, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 1976.Google Scholar
Mittelhammer, R.C. “The Estimation of Domestic Demand for Salad Vegetables Using a Priori Information”. Ph.D. Dissertation, Washington State University, 1978.Google Scholar
Price, D.W. and Mittelhammer, R.C.. “A Matrix of Demand Elasticities for Fresh Fruit”. West. J. Agr. Econ. 4(1)(1979):6986.Google Scholar
Takayama, T and Judge, G.G.. “An Interregional Activity Analysis Model for the Agricultural Sector”. J. Farm Econ.,46(1964):349365.Google Scholar
Takayama, T. and Judge, G.G.. Spatial and Temporal Price and Allocation Models. Amsterdam: North Holland Publication Company, 1971.Google Scholar
Todd, D.K. The Water Encyclopedia. New York: Water Information Center, Water Research Building, 1970.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (a). Agricultural Statistics, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1978-1987.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (b). Economic Research Service. Agricultural Outlook, 1983-1988.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (c). Economic Research Service. Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States (FATUS), Washington, DC, 1983-1988.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (d). Agricultural Marketing Service. Los Angeles Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Wholesale Market Prices, Washington, DC, 1983-1987.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (e). Agricultural Marketing Service. Dallas Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Wholesale Market Prices,Fruit and Vegetable Division, Washington, DC, 1983-1987.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (f). Economic Research Service. Atlanta Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Wholesale Market Prices, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Washington, DC, 1983-1987.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (g). Agricultural Marketing Service. Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Prices, Wholesale Chicago and New York City F.o.b. Leading Shipping Points, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Market News Branch, Washington, DC, 1978-1987.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (h). Agricultural Marketing Service. Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Shipments, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Washington, DC, 1983-1987.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (i). Agricultural Marketing Service. Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Truck Rate and Cost Summary, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Washington, DC, 1983-1987.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (j)- Agricultural Marketing Service. Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Arrival Totals, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Washington, DC, 1983-1986.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (k). Economic Research Service. Food Consumption, Prices, and Expenditures, 1966-87. Statistical Bulletin No. 773, Washington, DC, 1989.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States, Washington, DC, 1983-1987.Google Scholar