Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:36:03.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agriculture as the Problem: New Agendas and New Opportunities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Sandra S. Batie
Sandra S. Batie*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Agriculture was once seen as the solution to many of the nation's problems. A strong agricultural sector translated into a strong America. Kohl et al. have presented four reasons for the past public commitment to agriculture. First, the agricultural sector has had considerable political power; second, there has been a widely held perception that farmers were economically disadvantaged relative to the rest of society; third, for many decades the growth of rural economies has been dependent on healthy agricultural sectors; and, finally, information produced by colleges of agriculture has been seen as a public good worthy of support by general tax revenues.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , July 1988 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdalla, C, and Libby, L.W.. “Agriculture and Ground Water Quality: A Public Policy Perspective.” Amer. J. Alternative Agr., 2 (1987):37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babb, E.M., and Long, B.F.. “The Role of Alternative Agricultural Enterprises in a Changing Agricultural Economy.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 19 (July 1987):7–16.Google Scholar
Batie, S., Shabman, L., and Kramer, R.. “U.S. Agriculture.and Natural Resource Policy: Past and Future.” In Runge, C.F., (ed.), The Future of the North American Granary; Politics, Economics, and Resource Constraints in North American Agriculture. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University, 1986.Google Scholar
Blair, A., Cantor, K., and Zahm, S.. “Cancer and Pesticides Among Farmers.” In Pesticides and Groundwater: A Health Concern for the Midwest. Proceedings of a conference sponsored by the Freshwater Foundation and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, St. Paul, MN, October, 1986.Google Scholar
Bonnen, J.T. “A Century of Science in Agriculture: Lessons for Science Policy.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 18 (1986):1063–1080.Google Scholar
Briggs, P.C. “Arizona Program to Control Groundwater Pollution From Agricultural Chemicals.” In Canter, L.W. (ed.), Agricultural Chemicals and Ground Water Pollution Control. Proceedings of a National Symposium sponsored by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Kansas City, March 26-27, 1987.Google Scholar
Carson, R.Silent Spring. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1962.Google Scholar
Castle, E.N. “How to Change Agricultural Research and Extension to Make a Better Investment.” In Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies—1981. Oak Brook, IL: The Farm Foundation, 1981.Google Scholar
Center For Communication Dynamics. “Groundwater Contamination: The Measure of Public Concern.” Unpublished manuscript. Washington D.C., 1985.Google Scholar
Cohen, D.B. “San Joaquin Valley, CA: Risk Assessment of Pesticides in Ground Water.” In Canter, L.W. (ed.), “Agricultural Chemicals and Ground Water Pollution Control.” Proceedings of a National Symposium sponsored by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Kansas City, March 26-27, 1987.Google Scholar
Conservation Foundation. “Environmental Momentum Picks Up Again.” The Conservation Foundation Letter (November-December, 1986):1–8.Google Scholar
Conservation Foundation. Groundwater Protection. Washington D.C.The Conservation Foundation, 1987.Google Scholar
Cook, K. “Commentary: Pinch Me, I Must Be Dreaming.” J. Soil and Water Conservation, 41 (March-April, 1986):93–94.Google Scholar
Copeland, C., and Zinn, J.. “Agricultural Nonpoint Pollution Policy: A Federal Perspective.” Congressional Research Service 86-191 ENR, Washington D.C., Library of Congress, 1986.Google Scholar
Derouin, J.G., and Bartlett, Rep. D.. “New Arizona Act Designed to Assure Water Quality.” Arizona Waterline. Pheonix, AZ, Winter 1987.Google Scholar
Evans, M.A. “Health Effects from Groundwater Pesticides.” In Pesticides and Groundwater: A Health Concern for the Midwest. Proceedings of a conference sponsored by The Freshwater Foundation and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, St. Paul, MN, October, 1986.Google Scholar
Feliciano, D.V. “Agricultural Effects on Ground Water Quality.” Congressional Research Service, 86-891 ENR, Washington D.C., Library of Congress, 1986.Google Scholar
Freistadt, M. “Time for Cooperation.” Agri Chemical Age, (January 1988):22–27.Google Scholar
Gianessi, L.P. “Lack of Data Stymies Informed Decisions on Agricultural Pesticides.” Resources. Washington D.C.: Resources For The Future, 1987.Google Scholar
Goodhouse, M. “Connecticut River Valley: Public Response to EDB Contamination.” In Canter, L.W. (ed.), “Agricultural Chemicals and Ground Water Pollution Control.” Proceedings of a National Symposium sponsored by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Kansas City, March 26-27, 1987.Google Scholar
Hallberg, G.R. “From Hoes to Herbicides: Agriculture and Groundwater Quality.” Soil and >Water Conservation, 41 (1986):357–363.Google Scholar
Halstead, J.M., Batie, S.S., and Kramer, R.A.. “Agricultural Practices and Environmental Attitudes of Rockingham County, VA, Dairy Farmers: Results of a Survey.” Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Agricultural Economics Special Paper 88-1, January, 1988.Google Scholar
Harris, C.K., Gilbert, J., and McAllister, J.. “The Changing Structure of Farmland Ownership in the South.” In Molnar, J.J., (ed)., Agricultural Change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Harris, L. “Environmental Issues Could Become a Factor in Congressional Race.” New York, NY: The Harris Survey, The New York Syndicate, 1986.Google Scholar
Healy, R.G.Competition for Land in the American South: Agriculture, Human Settlement on the Environment. Washington D.C.: The Conservation Foundation, 1985.Google Scholar
Holden, P.W.Pesticides and Groundwater Quality: Issues and Problems in Four States. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J.W.Agenda, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1984.Google Scholar
Kohl, D.M., Shabman, L.A., and Stoevener, H.H. “Extension Economists in a Changing Agricultural Economy.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 19 (July 1987):35–44.Google Scholar
Libby, L.W. “Restructuring Agricultural Economics Extension to Meet Changing Needs.” Amer. J. Agri. Econ., 68 (1986):1313–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A.A. “Why Pesticides Received Extensive Use in America: A Political Economy of Agricultural Pest Management to 1970.” Natural Resources J., 27 (1987):533–590.Google Scholar
Mawby, R.G. “Evolution of the Land-Grant System.” In Issues Facing Agriculture and Implications for Land Grant Colleges of Agriculture. Proceeding of a workshop sponsored by North Central Council of Administrative Heads of Agriculture and The Farm Foundation, Chicago, IL, October 9-10, 1985.Google Scholar
Mueller, W. “States Take the Initiative.” Agrichemical Age, January 1988, pp. 30–33.Google Scholar
National Association of State Departments of Agriculture. “Connecticut Struggles with Pollution Liability Issues.” Farmland Notes, 6 (March, 1987):1–3.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Ground Water Quality Protection: State and Local Strategies. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E.G., and Lee, L.K. “The Magnitude and Costs of Groundwater Contamination from Agricultural Chemicals: A National Perspective.” USDA, ERS Agricultural Economic Report 576, October, 1987.Google Scholar
New York Times. “Cancer Risk Reassessed by EPA: Research Suggests Threats Overstated.” Reprinted in the Roanoke Times, January 4, 1988.Google Scholar
Norris, P., and Shabman, L.. “Transition in Agriculture: Opportunities for Improved Water Quality for the Chesapeake Bay in Virginia.” Unpublished paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1988.Google Scholar
Osgood, B.T. “Marketing Strategies for Conservation Systems: Working With Changing Agricultural Clienteles.” In Optimum Erosion Control at Least Cost. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Conservation Systems, Chicago, IL, December 14-15, 1987.Google Scholar
Paarlberg, D.Farm and Food Policy: Issues of the 1980s. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Padgitt, S.“Agriculture and Ground Water Quality as a Social Issue: Assessing Farming Practices and Potential for Change.” Paper presented at the Agricultural Impacts of Ground Water National Conference, sponsored by the National Water Well Association, Omaha, NB, August, 1986.Google Scholar
Pfister, A.J., and Hawke, Rep.L.. “Struggle to Get Act Frustrating, Rewarding.” Arizona Waterline. Phoenix, AZ, Winter 1987.Google Scholar
Pins, K. “Poll: Iowans Want Limits on Agricultural Chemicals.” Des Moines Register, Des Moines, Iowa, November 16, 1986.Google Scholar
Rushefsky, M.E.Making Cancer Policy. New York: State University of New York Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Sachs, C. Blair, D., and Richter, C.. “Consumer Pesticide Concerns: A 1965 and 1984 Comparison.” J. Consumer Affairs, 21 (1987):96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, G.E. “Revitalizing Land Grant Universities: It's Time To Regain Relevance.” Choices, 1 (1986):6–10.Google Scholar
Sinclair, W. “Swampbuster Penalties Irk Farmers: Law to Preserve Fragile Wetlands is Protested on Capitol Hill.” Washington Post, p. A–4, January 27, 1988a.Google Scholar
Sinclair, W. “The Agri-Biz Bonanza: How Your Tax Dollars Produced the Cubical Tomato.” The Washington Post, p. A–1, January 10, 1988b.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. “Inputs, Outlook, and Situation Report.” Economic Research Service IOS-7, Washington D.C., 1985.Google Scholar
Williams, M. “Leopold Center is Not for ‘Organic’ Farming.” The Des Moines Register, May 23, 1987, p. B–1.Google Scholar
Wimberly, R.C. “Trends and Dimensions in U.S. Agricultural.Structure.” In Molnar, J.J., (ed.), Agricultural Change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1986.Google Scholar