Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:37:12.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agricultural Economists in Rural Development: Responsibilities, Opportunities, Risks, and Payoffs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

James R. Nelson  and
Gerald A. Doeksen
James R. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University
Gerald A. Doeksen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Rural development research and extension activities directly impact approximately 100 million U.S. farm and nonfarm residents; whereas, commercial agricultural programs directly impact about 6 million farm residents (U.S. Department of Commerce, b). Based on this fact, it is difficult to understand why rural development research and extension programs are often listed last when priorities for funding are discussed.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , July 1984 , pp. 41 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaulieu, Lionel J. and Carter, Keith A.. “Faciliating Citizen Input in the Community Needs Assessment Process,” Rural Development Research and Education, Vol. 3, No. 3, Southern Rural Development Center, Mississippi State, 1979.Google Scholar
DuVall, Talmadge. “CRT's Responsibility to Extension,” presented at 1983 Triannual Southern Community Resource Development Training Meeting, Birmingham, 1983.Google Scholar
Eddleman, B. R. Unpublished data from Current Research Information System (CRIS) concerning Cooperative State Research Service (CSRS) inventory of resources for 1981. Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, 1983.Google Scholar
Erickson, Don and Owens, Wayne W.. “Tools and Techniques Available for Community Development,” Leaflet No. 4, Kansas Cooperative Extension Service, Manhattan, 1973.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, H. C. State Agricultural Experiment Stations: A History of Research Policy and Procedure, Miscellaneous Publication No. 904, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1962.Google Scholar
Powers, Ronald C. “An Overview of Applied Research in Rural Development,” Public Programs in Rural Development-Investment Strategies and Research Needs (Nelson, James R., ed.), Great Plains Agricultural Council Publication No. 90, Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, 1979.Google Scholar
Stam, Jerome M. “On the Taxonomy of Non-Metropolitan Community Services Research,” in National Conference on Non-Metropolitan Community Services Research, Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, Committee Print, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1977.Google Scholar
Tweeten, Luther. Foundations of Farm Policy, University of Nebraska Press, 1970.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Extension Service. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Historical Statistics of the United States; Colonial Times to 1970, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1975.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce (a). 1980 Census of Population, Number of Inhabitants, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1982.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce (b). Statistical Abstract of the United States 1982-83, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1982.Google Scholar