Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T23:23:50.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Adoption of IPM Techniques By Vegetable Growers in Florida, Michigan and Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jorge Fernandez-Cornejo ,
E. Douglas Beach  and
Wen-Yuan Huang
Jorge Fernandez-Cornejo
Affiliation:
Resources and Technology Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
E. Douglas Beach
Affiliation:
Resources and Technology Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Wen-Yuan Huang
Affiliation:
Resources and Technology Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Factors influencing the adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) techniques are studied using survey data from individual vegetable producers from Florida, Michigan, and Texas. Farmers who adopt IPM tend to be less risk averse and use more managerial time on farm activities than nonadopters. Adopters are also more likely to operate large, irrigated farms and use more family labor. Locational factors and the type of crop grown are also influential in IPM adoption. The analysis uses a logit framework and introduces adopter categories first conceptualized by rural sociologists.

Keywords

diffusion of innovationsintegrated pest managementtechnology adoptionvegetables
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , July 1994 , pp. 158 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashby, J.A. “The Social Ecology of Soil Erosion in a Colombian Farming System.” Rur. Soc. 50(1985): 377–96.Google Scholar
Bultena, G.L. “Sociological Factors in Conservation Adoptions: A Study of Reduced Tillage and IPM.” Integration of Pest Management and Conservation Tillage. Proceedings of North Central Region Workshop, St. Louis, MO, 1985.Google Scholar
Bultena, G. L., and Hoiberg, E. O.. “Factors Affecting Farmers' Adoption of Conservation Tillage.” J. Soil and Water Conserv. May-June(1983):281–84.Google Scholar
Burrows, T.M. “Pesticide Demand and Integrated Pest Management: A Limited Dependent Variable Analysis.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 65(1983):806–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, M., and Zilberman, D.. “The Choices of Irrigation Technologies in California.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 67(1985):224–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J., and Loomis, J.. “Economic Value of Wildlife Resources in the San Joaquin Valley: Hunting and Viewing Values.” in The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture, edited by Dinar, A. and Zilberman, D.. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Acad. Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Council on Environmental Quality. “Report to the President: Progress Made by Federal Agencies in the Advancement of Integrated Pest Management.” Washington, D.C., 1980.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R.E., and Martin, K. E.. “Bringing Environment into the Study of Agriculture: Observations and Suggestions Regarding the Sociology of Agriculture.” Rur. Soc. 48(1983):201–18.Google Scholar
Feder, G., and O'Mara, G.. “Farm Size and the Diffusion of Green Revolution Technology.” Econ. Develop, and Cultur. Change. 30(1981):59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, G., and O'Mara, G.. “On Information and Innovation Diffusion: A Bayesian Approach.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 64(1982):145–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, G., Just, R. J., and Zilberman, D.. “Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey.” Econ. Develop, and Cultur. Change. (1985):255–98.Google Scholar
Fomby, T.B., Hill, R. C., and Johnson, S. R.. Advanced Econometric Methods. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, R.J. “The Introduction of Risk into a Programming Model.” Econometrica. 21(1954):253–63.Google Scholar
Greene, C.R., Kramer, R. A., Norton, G. W., Rajotte, E. C., and McPherson, R. M.. “An Economic Analysis of Soybean Integrated Pest Management.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 67(1985):567–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gianessi, L.P., and Puffer, C. A.. “Reregistration of Minor Pesticides: Some Observations and Implications.” Inputs Situation and Outlook Report. U.S. Dept. of Agr., Economic Research Service, February (1992):52–60.Google Scholar
Grilliches, Z. “Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change.” Econometrica. 25(1957):501–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C.H., and Duncan, G.. “Econometric Evaluation of New Technology with an Application to Integrated Pest Management.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 66(1984):624–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallberg, G.R. “Agricultural Chemicals in Ground Water: Extent and Implications.” Am. J. Alternative Agr. 2(1987):3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, C. R., and Zilberman, D.. “Pest Externalities from Agricultural Inputs.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 71(1989):692–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J. K., Rister, M. E., Mjelde, J. W., Drees, B. M., and Way, M. O.. “Factors Influencing the Adoption of Insect Management Technology.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 72(1990):996–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiebert, L.D. “Risk, Learning, and the Adoption of Fertilizer Responsive Seed Varieties.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 56(1974):764–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, G.C., Griffiths, W. E., Hill, R. C., Lutkepohl, H., and Lee, Tsoung-Chao. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, second edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1985.Google Scholar
Just, R. E., Zilberman, D., and Rauser, G. C.. “A Putty-Clay Approach to the Distributional Effects of New Technology Under Risk.” in Operations Research in Agriculture and Water Resources, edited by Yaron, D. and Tapiero, C.. New York: North Holland Publishing Company, 1980.Google Scholar
Kovach, J. and Tette, J. P.. “A Survey of the Use of IPM by New York Apple Producers.” Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment. 20(1988):101–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddala, G.S.Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, C.K.Industrial Research and Technological Innovation. New York: Norton, 1966.Google Scholar
McFadden, D. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” in Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Zaremka, P.. New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
McNamara, K. T., Wetzstein, M. E., and Douce, G. K.. “Factors Affecting Peanut Producer Adoption of Integrated Pest Management.” Rev. Agr. Econ. 13(1991):129–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, L. “The Public Residue Database.” in Pesticide Residues and Food Safety: A Harvest of Viewpoints, ed. Tweedy, B. G., Dishburger, H. J., Balantine, L. G., and McCarthy, J.. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1991.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences. Regulating Pesticides in Food. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 1987.Google Scholar
Nowak, P.J. “The Adoption of Agricultural Conservation Technologies: Economic and Diffusion Explanations.” Rur. Soc. 52(1987):208–20.Google Scholar
Putler, D. S., and Zilberman, D.. “Computer Use in Agriculture: Evidence from Tulare County, California.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 70(1988):790–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. Pest Management Strategies: Volume II - Working Papers. Washington, D.C., 1979.Google Scholar
Rahm, M. R., and Huffman, E.. “Adoption of Reduced Tillage: The Role of Human Capital and Other Variables.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 66(1984):405–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, L. J., and Barry, P. J.. The Competitive Firm's Response to Risk. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1987.Google Scholar
Rogers, E.M.Diffusion of Innovations, third edition. New York: Free Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Slavin, R.E.Educational Psychology: Theory into Practice, second edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. K., Ladewig, H. and McIntosh, W. A.. “The Adoption of Integrated Pest Management Practice Among Texas Cotton Growers.” Rur. Soc. 55(1990):395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Agr., Economic Research Service. Agricultural Resources: Inputs, Situation and Outlook Report. Selected years.Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Agr., Economic Research Service. Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: Production and Efficiency Statistics, 1990, ECIFS 10-3, May 1992.Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Agr., National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). “Agricultural Chemical Use: 1990 Vegetables Summary.” June 1991.Google Scholar
Virginia Cooperative Extension Service (VCES). “The National Evaluation of Extension's Integrated Pest Management Programs.” In association with Virginia Technical University and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Blacksburg, VA. 1987.Google Scholar
Willey, W.R.Z. “Barriers to the Diffusion of IPM in Commercial Agriculture.” in Pest Control Strategies, ed. Smith, E. and Pimentel, D.. New York: Academic Press, 1978:285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar