Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:04:30.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Adequacy of the Independence of Markets Assumption in Interregional Competition Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

W. Lanny Bateman
W. Lanny Bateman*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia Collegeor Agriculture Experiment Station, Georgia Station, Experiment (Griffin), Georgia 30212
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An important function of agricultural economics is to determine the competitive potential for beginning or expanding production of a commodity in a specified area. This problem is approached through budgeting techniques and/or more sophisticated models such as linear or reactive programming. Many examples using LP or reactive programming algorithms are available. In two recent studies, reactive models were used to examine the market for potatoes and sweet cherries. These studies provided an insight into the relative competitive position among producing areas and among consuming centers. To reach a solution, the competitive assumption of LP or reactive models requires independence of supply functions for producing regions and demand functions for consuming markets. Thus, frequently the demand price for a given commodity in a market is estimated as a function of volume in that market and perhaps time, income or other variables. The resulting equation is used by inserting the mean value of all explanatory variables except volume, resulting in an equation that has price as a function of volume, plus a constant, and is compatible reactive programming.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , December 1975 , pp. 135 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] The Coastal Plains Regional Commission. The Economic Alternatives of Producing and Marketing Fruits and Vegetables in The Coastal Plains Region of Georgia and The Carolinas, Report by the Commission, March 1971.Google Scholar
[2] Davis, Fred. “Transportation Costs Program for Reactive Programming,” Mimeograph Paper, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi, 1960.Google Scholar
[3] Lewis, Richard A. and Langham, Max R.. “The Competitive Position of Major U.S. Potato Producing Regions,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 6, No. 1, July 1974, pp. 229–234.Google Scholar
[4] O'Rourke, A. Desmond and Casavant, Kenneth L.. Interregional and Intertemporal Competition in Fresh Sweet Cherries, Washington State University College of Agriculture, Research Bulletin 803.Google Scholar
[5] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Prices, Agricultural Marketing Service, Fruit and Vegetable Division (Washington, D.C.), Issues for 1963-73 period.Google Scholar
[6] U.S. Department of Agriculture. Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Unload Totals for 41 Cities, Agricultural Marketing Service. Fruit and Vegetable Division, Market News Branch, (Washington, D.C.). Calendar years 1963-1973.Google Scholar