Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:32:08.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Valuing the Changes in Herbicide Risks Resulting from Adoption of Roundup Ready Soybeans by U.S. Farmers: A Revealed-Preference Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Olha Sydorovych  and
Michele Marra
Olha Sydorovych
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Michele Marra
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A revealed-preference–based approach is proposed for valuation of the environmental and human impacts of pesticides. It is assumed that farmers reveal their willingness to pay for improved pesticide safety by selecting a specific product out of the set of available alternatives based on their costs, effectiveness, and safety. The approach is applied to estimate the welfare impact of changed patterns of herbicide use on Roundup Ready soybeans. The results indicate that farmers associate positive values with safety improvements. The aggregate welfare impact of the reduced risk for the U.S. soybean farmers was estimated to be $90.3 million in 2001.

Keywords

pesticide human and environmental risks, revealed preferences, Roundup Ready soybeansQ51
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , December 2008 , pp. 777 - 787
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antle, J., and Pingali, P. “Pesticides, Productivity, and Farmer Health: A Philippine Case Study.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(1994):418-30.Google Scholar
Beach, D., and Carlson, G. “A Hedonic Analysis of Herbicides: Do User Safety and Water Quality Matter?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(1993):612-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brethour, C., and Weersink, A. “An Economic Evaluation of the Environmental Benefits from Pesticide Reduction.” Agricultural Economics 25(2001):219-26.Google Scholar
Carpenter, J., Felsot., A., Goode., T., Hamming., M., Onstad., D., and Sankula, S. Comparative Environmental Impacts of Biotechnology—Derived and Traditional Soybean, Corn, and Cotton Crops. Ames, IA: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, 2002.Google Scholar
Cuyno, L., Norton., G., and Rola, A. “Economic Analysis of Environmental Benefits of Integrated Pest Management: A Philippine Case Study.” Agricultural Economics 25(2001):227-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falck-Zepeda, J., Traxler., G., and Nelson, R. “Surplus Distribution from the Introduction of a Biotechnology Innovation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(2000):360-69.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J., and Jans, S. “Quality-Adjusted Price and Quality Indices for Pesticides.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1995):645-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florax, R., Travisi., C., and Nijkamp, P. “A Meta-Analysis of the Willingness to Pay for Reduction in Pesticide Exposure.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 32(2005):441-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, V., and Mourato, S. “Valuing the Multiple Impacts of Pesticide Use in the UK: A Contingent Ranking Approach.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 51(2000): 1–21.Google Scholar
Higley, L., and Wintersteen, W. “A Novel Approach to Environmental Risk Assessment of Pesticides as a Basis for Incorporating Environmental Costs into Economic Injury Levels.” American Entomologist (Spring 1992): 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, B., and Carlson, G. “Effects of Insecticide Attributes on Within-Season Insecticide Product and Rate Choices: The Case of U.S. Apple Growers.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1998):382-96.Google Scholar
Kafle, A. Pesticide Use and Health Costs: A Brief Bibliographical Survey. Internet site: www.sandeeonline.org/publications/bibliographies/pdf/pesticide_final.pdf (Accessed October 4, 2007).Google Scholar
Kling, C. “The Gains from Combining Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation Data to Value Nonmarket Goods.” Land Economics 73(1997): 428-39.Google Scholar
Krinsky, I., and Robb, L. “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 68(1986):715—19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, J., Barry., G., and Kishore, G. “The Herbicide Glyphosate.” BioFactors 2(1989): 17–25.Google Scholar
Marra, M. “Agricultural Biotechnology: A Critical Review of the Impact Evidence to Date.” The Future of Food: Biotechnology Markets and Policies in an International Setting, Pardey, P. ed. Washington, DC.: IFPRI, 2001.Google Scholar
Nelson, G., and Bullock, D. “Simulating a Relative Environmental Effect of Glyphosate-Resistant Soybeans.” Ecological Economics 45(2003): 189–202.Google Scholar
Press, J., and Soderqvist, T. “On Estimating the Benefits of Groundwater Protection: A Contingent Valuation Study in Milan.” Regulating Chemical Accumulation in the Environment, Swanson, T. and Vighi, M. eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Price, G., Lin., W., Falck-Zepeda, J., and Fernandez-Cornejo, J. Size and Distribution of Market Benefits from Adopting Biotech Crops. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Report TB-1906, November 2003.Google Scholar
Qaim, M., and Traxler, G. “Roundup Ready Soybeans in Argentina: Farm Level and Aggregate Welfare Effects.” Agricultural Economics 32(2005):73–86.Google Scholar
Rozman, K., Doull., J., and Hayes, W. “Dose, Time and Other Factors Influencing Toxicity.” Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology Principles, Krieger, R. ed. London: Academic Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Sivayoganathan, C., Gnanachandran., S., Lewes., J., and Fernando, M. “Protective Measure Use and Symptoms among Agropesticide Applicators in Sri Lanka.” Social Science and Medicine 40(2000):431-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soderqvist, T. “Valuing Chemical Characteristics: A Hedonic Approach.” Regulating Chemical Accumulation in the Environment, Swanson, T. and Vighi, M. eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Sydorovych, O., and Marra, M. “Genetically Engineered Crop's Impact on Pesticide Use: A Revealed-Preference Index Approach.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 32(2007):476-91.Google Scholar
Train, K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Travisi, C., Nijkamp., P., and Vindigni, G. “Pesticide Risk Valuation in Empirical Economics: A Comparative Approach.” Ecological Economics 56(2006):455-74.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture-NASS. A creage. Internet site: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/Acre//2000s/(Accessed October 4,2007).Google Scholar
Whitford, F. The Complete Book of Pesticide Management: Science, Regulation, Stewardship, and Communication. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2002.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. “Private Costs and the Relation between Pesticide Exposure and 111 Health: Evidence from Sri Lanka.” Environmental Economics and Policy 5(2002):213-27.Google Scholar