Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:43:27.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United States Perspective: Southern Agriculture and the World Economy: The Multilateral Trade Negotiations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Kenneth C. Clayton
Kenneth C. Clayton*
Affiliation:
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, Washington, D.C
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The current “Uruguay Round” of trade negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) began with the Declaration by trade ministers at Punta del Este, Uruguay, in September 1986. To conduct the negotiations, an agricultural negotiating group, along with fourteen other such groups, has been established. Negotiating proposals on agriculture have been offered by the Nordic Countries, the European Community (EC), Canada, the Cairns group, Japan, and the United States.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , July 1988 , pp. 73 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breckling, J., Thorpe, S., and Stoeckel, A.. Effects of EC Agricultural Policies: A General Equilibrium Approach. Wiston House Conference on Economy-Wide Effects of Farm Support Policies, Steyning, West Sussex, England, May 8-10, 1987.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). National Policies and Agricultural Trade. Paris: OECD, 1987.Google Scholar
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. United States Proposal for Negotiations on Agriculture. Washington D.C., July 7, 1987.Google Scholar
World Bank. World Development Report 1986. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar