Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:17:50.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Subsidies, Environmental Pollution, and Utilization of Agricultural Wastes: An Oregon Example*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jagjit S. Brar  and
Frank S. Conklin
Jagjit S. Brar
Affiliation:
Southeastern Louisiana University
Frank S. Conklin
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Increased public awareness in recent years regarding environmental pollution has generated concern over the disposal of household, commercial, industrial, animal, and agricultural wastes. In most cases, utilization of these wastes is not feasible because of high recovery costs. The substantial quantities involved often preclude disposal by landfills and their burning contributes to air pollution. One such case is the environmental pollution caused from disposal of grass seed residue by open field burning in Oregon.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , December 1973 , pp. 175 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Paper No. 3593

References

[1]Baumol, William J. and Oats, Wallace E., “The Use of Standards and Prices for the Protection of Environment.” Swedish Journal of Economics, Vol. 73, March 1971, pp. 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Baumol, William J., “On Taxation and the Control of Externalities.” American Economic Review, Vol. 52, No. 3, June 1972, pp. 307–323.Google Scholar
[3]Bonlie, Russell W. and Hudson, Arthur E.., “Reduction of Air Pollution by Mobile Field Incinerator.” A paper presented at the Annual Symposium on Thermal Agriculture, Dallas, Texas, Jan. 29, 1971.Google Scholar
[4]Boulding, Kenneth E., Economic Analysis, Vol. 1, Microeconomics, 4th edition, Harper and Row, New York, 1961, p. 720.Google Scholar
[5]Brar, Jagjit S.,“Costs of Alternative Pollution Control Policies Affecting Open Field Burning in the Willamette Valley of Oregon: A Study in Measurement,” unpublished PhD. thesis, Oregon State University, 1972, p. 118.Google Scholar
[6]Bublitz, W. J., “Pulping Characteristics of Oregon Seed Grass Residues: Preliminary Investigation of Annual Rye Grass Straw (Lolium multiflorum Lan.). Tappi, Vol. 53, No. 12, Dec. 1970, pp. 2291–2294.Google Scholar
[7]Conklin, Frank S., “Environmental Quality Problems: A Study of Field Burning in the Willamette Valley.” Oregon Agri. Exp. Stat. Tech. Paper 2921, July 1970.Google Scholar
[8]Conklin, Frank S. and Bradshaw, Carlyle R., “Farmer Alternatives to Open Field Burning.” Oregon Agri. Exp. Stat. Special Report 3 36, Oct. 1971.Google Scholar
[9]Conklin, Frank S., Page, Glen, Inoue, Michael, and Youngberg, Harold, “A Report of Research at Oregon State University Associated with Field Burning with Implications for Grass Residue Utilization in Japan.” A paper presented to Dr. Roy Young's Coordinating Committee Evaluating Japanese Market Potential for Grass Seed Residues. Oregon State University, May 1972.Google Scholar
[10]Guthrie, John A.; An Economic Analysis of the Pulp and Paper Industry. Washington State University Press, Pullman, 1972, p. 235.Google Scholar
[11]Hale, Carl W., “The Optimality of Local Subsidies in Regional Development Programs,” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, Vol. 9, Autumn 1969, pp. 35–51.Google Scholar
[12]Kneese, Allen V., “Background for the Economic Analysis of Environmental Pollution,” Swedish Journal of Economics, Vol. 73, March 1971, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Mass, Arthur, “Benefit-Cost Analysis: Its Relevance to Public Investment Evaluation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 80, No. 2, May 1966, pp. 208–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Mishan, E. J., “What is Producers' Surplus,” American Economic Review, Vol.58, Dec. 1968, pp. 1269–1282.Google Scholar
[15]Moes, John E., Local Subsidies for Industry. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1962.Google Scholar
[16]Porfily, Lenard and Conklin, Frank S., “A Study of Technical and Economic Factors Surrounding Shipment of Grass Seed Residue to Japan,” Circular of Information 638, Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University, March 1973, 28 p.Google Scholar
[17]Sandwell International, “Annual Ryegrass Seed Straw Utilization Study,” Report W3063/1, State Board of Higher Education, Corvallis, Oregon, Sept. 28, 1972, 24 p.Google Scholar
[18]Schmalensee, Richard, “Consumers' Surplus and Producers' Goods,” American Economic Review, Vol. 61, Sept. 1971, pp. 682–687.Google Scholar
[19]Vickrey, William, “The Possibilities of Air Pollution Control Through Various Forms of Effluent Change,” Study of Social and Economic Effects of Changes in Air Quality,Air Resources Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis, June 1970, 87 p.Google Scholar