Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:27:47.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rural Roads and Bridges, 1994–2000: How Did the South Fare?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Eileen S. Stommes
Eileen S. Stommes*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Food and Rural Economics Division, Washington, DC
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1991, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) changed the federal-state transportation relationship by devolving decision making to the states. In turn, states were required to work with local officials on transportation improvements. ISTEA was authorized for 1992–1997, and the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century continued ISTEA policies through 2003. Changes in road and bridge conditions in the rural south are examined under these new transportation policies. Federal funding trends are detailed with state funding. Overall condition of roads and bridges eligible for federal funding improved, traffic increased on all roads, but condition disparities between local roads and federally funded roads grew.

Keywords

southern road and bridge conditionsouthern road and bridge financingsouthern rural bridgessouthern rural roadsH54R40R41R49
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , August 2003 , pp. 263 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Washington, DC: AASHTO, 1990.Google Scholar
Bennett, N. “The National Highway System Designation Act of 1995.” Public Roads On-Line, Spring 1996, Internet site: http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/spring96 (Accessed November 20, 2002).Google Scholar
Brown, D.Will Increased Highway Funding Help Rural Areas? Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, AIB-735, 1999.Google Scholar
Hartgen, D.T., and Lindeman, N.J.. “Emerging Gaps in Highway Performance Between States and Road Classes During the ISTEA Years.” Transportation Quarterly 54(Winter 2000):35–53.Google Scholar
McCann, B., Kienitz, R., and DeLille, B.. Changing Direction: Federal Transportation Spending in the 1990s. Washington, DC: Surface Transportation Policy Project, March 2000.Google Scholar
Title 23, U.S.C., Section 116, Maintenance.Google Scholar
Title 23, U.S.C., Section 151, National Bridge Inspection Program.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). A Summary: Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Washington, DC, 1992.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). A Summary: Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. Washington, DC, 1998a.Google Scholar
USDOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Transportation Statistics Annual Report, 1999. Washington, DC, 1999a.Google Scholar
USDOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Transportation Statistics Annual Report, 2000. Washington, DC, 2000a.Google Scholar
USDOT, Federal Highway Administration. Highway Functional Classification: Concepts, Criteria and Procedures. Washington, DC, 1989.Google Scholar
USDOT, Federal Highway Administration. 1990 Highway Statistics. Washington, DC, 1991.Google Scholar
USDOT, Federal Highway Administration. A Report to the Congress on the Results of the Highway Functional Reclassification. Washington, DC, December 1993.Google Scholar
USDOT, Federal Highway Administration. 1994 Highway Statistics. Washington, DC, 1995a. Internet site: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim (Accessed November 20, 2002).Google Scholar
USDOT, Federal Highway Administration. Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) Field Manual. Washington, DC, December 1999b. Internet site: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim (Accessed November 21, 2002).Google Scholar
USDOT, Federal Highway Administration. Federal-Aid Policy Guide, Subchapter E—Planning, Part 470—Highway Systems, Subpart A—Federal Aid Highway Systems. Washington, DC, 1997a.Google Scholar
USDOT, Federal Highway Administration. The Status of the Nation's Highway Bridges: Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program and National Bridge Inventory, Thirteenth Report to the United States Congress. Washington, DC, May 1997b.Google Scholar
USDOT, Federal Highway Administration. 1997 Highway Statistics. Washington, DC, 1998b. Internet site: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim (Accessed November 20, 2002).Google Scholar
USDOT, Federal Highway Administration. 2000 Highway Statistics. Washington, DC, 2000b. Internet site: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim (Accessed December 27, 2002).Google Scholar
USDOT, Federal Highway Administration. National Bridge Inventory. Washington, DC, 2000c. Internet site: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nib.htm (Accessed December 27, 2002).Google Scholar
USDOT, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Engineering. Recording and Coding Guide for the Structure, Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation's Bridges, FHWA-PD-96-001. Washington, DC, December 1995b.Google Scholar
USDOT, Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration. 1999 Status of the Nation's Highways, Bridges and Transit: Conditions and Performance. Report to Congress. Washington, DC, May 2, 2000d. Internet site: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/1999cpr (Accessed December 28, 2002).Google Scholar
USDOT, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Information Management. Our Nation's Highways: Selected Facts and Figures, FHWA-PL-98-015. Washington, DC, 1998c. Internet site: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim (Accessed December 27, 2002).Google Scholar
Walzer, N., and McFadden, C.. Linking America: The County Highway System. Washington, DC: National Association of Counties, 1989.Google Scholar