Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:06:32.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Retail Price Effect of the Kentucky and Tennessee Milk Marketing Laws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

W.F. Edwards  and
James F. Thompson
W.F. Edwards
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
James F. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Finance, Murray State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Retail prices of milk in Kentucky and Tennessee are compared following the abolishment of Kentucky's Milk Marketing Law. Data and comparisons are also presented from the six adjacent states having no milk marketing law.

Keywords

milkpricesretail competitionregulation
Type
Notes
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , December 1989 , pp. 211 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babb, E.A. Bessler, D.A., and Pheasant, J.. Analysis of Over-Order Payments in Federal Milk Marketing Orders. Bulletin 235, Indiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Purdue University, 1979.Google Scholar
Bartlett, R.W. Is State Control of Consumer Milk Prices in the Public Interest? Bulletin 705, University of Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station, 1965.Google Scholar
Federal Milk Marketing Orders and Price Supports. Ford Administration Papers on Regulatory Reform, American Enterprise Institute Studies in Governmental Regulation 176. Ed. MacAvoy, Paul W.. Washington D.C. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1977.Google Scholar
Hallbert, M.C. and King, R.. “Pricing of Milk and Dairy Products.” Bulletin 150, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, 1980.Google Scholar
Knutson, R.D. “The Economic Consequences of the Minnesota Dairy Industry Unfair Trade Practices Act.” Jour. Law Econ., 12, 2 (1969):377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, R.T. and DeBrock, L.M.. “The Structural Effects of State Regulation of Retail Fluid Milk Prices.” Rev. Econ. Stat, 62, 2 (1980):15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, C.N. Hallbert, M.C., and Pierce, C.W.. Impact of State Regulation on Market Performance in the Fluid Milk Industry. Bulletin 803, Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station, Pennsylvania State University, 1985.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.F. and Edwards, W.F.. Public Welfare Aspects of Dairy Policy With Emphasis on the Kentucky Milk Marketing Law. Research Report prepared for the Kentucky Department of Agriculture, published at Murray State University, 1981.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.F. and Edwards, W.F.. Dairy Policy and Public Interest: The Economics Legacies. CATO Institute Policy Analysis No. 57, CATO Institute, 1985.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Statistical Reporting Service, Crop Reporting Board. Prices Received by Farmers: Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry, by State and United States, 1978-1982. Statistical Bulletin 727, Washington D.C. 1985.Google Scholar