Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:59:57.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regional Impact of Urban Water Use on Irrigated Agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

John G. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University
Ronald D. Lacewell
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Teofilo Ozuna Jr.
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Lonnie L. Jones
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station, TX

Abstract

Linear programming and regional input-output models were applied to estimate the impacts of increased pumping costs for irrigated agriculture due to groundwater depletion principally caused by the expanding urban area of San Antonio, Texas. A biophysical simulator was used to estimate linear programming coefficients of crop yield by irrigation level and timing. The results indicate significant local (county) economic impacts from groundwater mining but insignificant regional impacts. A major improvement in irrigation efficiency would be required to offset the increased pumping costs and reduced water availability associated with increased lifts due to urban expansion.

Type
Submitted Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Society of Civil Engineers. “Describing Irrigation Efficiency and Uniformity.Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 104(1978):3541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boggess, W. G., and Amerling, C. B.. “A Bioeconomic Simulation Analysis of Irrigation Investment.So. J. Agr. Econ., 15, 2(1983):8592.Google Scholar
Burnham, B. O.Markov Intertemporal Land Use Simulation Model.So. J. Agr. Econ., 5, 1(1973):253258.Google Scholar
CH2M Hill. “San Antonio Regional Water Resources Study.” Final completion report prepared for city of San Antonio and Edwards Underground Water District. 1986.Google Scholar
Greenwalt, B., and May, R.. “Cost Comparison of Operating Irrigation Wells Using Different Power Sources.” Paper presented at the Delta States Farm Management Committee, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, May 29, 1980.Google Scholar
Kingston, M.The Texas Almanac.Dallas: A.H.Belo Corp., 19861987.Google Scholar
Lin, S.A.Y.. Theory and Measurement of Economic Externalities. New York: Academic Press Inc., 1976.Google Scholar
Mapp, H. P., and Eidman, V. R.. “Simulation of Soil Water-Crop Yield System: The Potential for Economic Analysis.So. J. Agr. Econ., 7, 1(1975):4754.Google Scholar
Musser, W. N., and Tew, B. V.. “Use of Biophysical Simulation in Production Economics.So. J. Agr. Econ., 16, 1(1984):7786.Google Scholar
Mustafa, G., and Jones, L. L.. RIMLOC: Regional Input-Output Models Using Location Quotients. PDM 71-4, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, 1971.Google Scholar
Pena, J. Area Economist, Winter Garden Region. Texas Agricultural Extension Service. Personal Communication.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. A., and Corty, F. L.. “Conversion of Prime Agricultural Land to Nonagricultural Uses in One Area of the Sunbelt.So. J. Agri. Econ., 5, 2(1982):2329.Google Scholar
Randall, A.The Problem of Market Failure.Natural Resources J., 23, 1(1983):131148.Google Scholar
Raynor, F. A.The Groundwater Supplies of the Southern High Plains of Texas.” Presented Paper at the Third Annual West Texas Water Conference, Lubbock, TX, February 5, 1965.Google Scholar
Schmid, A. A. Converting Land From Rural to Urban Uses. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press for Resources for the Future Inc., 1968.Google Scholar
Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Extension Economist-Management. “Texas Crop Budgets.” MP-1027, 1985.Google Scholar
Texas Crop and Livestock Reporting Service. “Texas Agricultural Crop Acreages, Cash Receipts, Prices Received and Paid By Farmers.U.S. Department of Agriculture, Austin, Texas, 19801983.Google Scholar
Texas Department of Water Resources. “Inventories of Irrigation in Texas, 1979.” Report 263, October, 1981.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Soil Survey of Uvalde County, Texas. Soil Conservation Service, 1976.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Regional Economic Information. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Washington, D.C., April, 1983.Google Scholar
U.S. Geological Survey. National Water Survey 1984. Water Supply Paper 2275, United States Government Printing Office, 1985.Google Scholar
Williams, J. R., Renard, K. G., and Dyke, P. T.. “EPIC, a New Method for Assessing Erosion Effect on Soil Productivity.J. Soil and Water Conservation, 38, 4(1983):381384.Google Scholar
Wright, M. L., Glasscock, A. H., and Easton, R.. The Texas Input-Output Model, 1979. Texas Department of Water Resources, LP-189. March, 1983.Google Scholar
Wyatt, W.Secondary Recovery of Capillary Water.” Proceedings of the Ogallala Aquifer Symposium II, edited by Whetston, G. A.. Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, 1984.Google Scholar