Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:22:12.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regional and Sectoral Effects of Competition for Wheat Transportation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Bruce H. Wright
Bruce H. Wright*
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, D.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Increased competition from barges and trucks for wheat traffic has caused rail charges for transporting wheat to decline relative to those for flour. Some flour milling centers now find themselves in an uneconomic location. The development and consequences of truck-barge-rail competition for wheat transportation is discussed in terms of the development of a differential between rates for wheat and flour. A spatial model that isolates the effects of these changes in rates for analysis is presented and the implications of the results are discussed as they pertain to various sectors and regions of the wheat-flour economy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , December 1969 , pp. 99 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Koopmans, T. C. “Optimum Utilization of the Transportation System,” Econometrica 17, Supplement: 136–146, 1949.Google Scholar
2.Leath, M. N. and Martin, J. E., “The Transshipment Problem with Inequality Constraints,” Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 48:894–908, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Rand McNally Handy Railroad Atlas of the United States, Rand McNally and Co., Chicago, Illinois, 1965.Google Scholar
4.U.S. Department of Agriculture, Consumer and Marketing Service, Grain Division, Grain Market News, Weekly Summary, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1967.Google Scholar
5.U.S. Department of Agriculture, Grain Market News, Weekly Summary, Vol. 15, No. 27, 1967.Google Scholar
6.U.S. Department of Agriculture, Grain Market News, Weekly Summary, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1968.Google Scholar
7.U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, U.S. Census of Population, 1960, Vol. I, Characteristics of the Population, Part A, “Number of Inhabitants,“ 1961.Google Scholar
8.Whittlesey, Norman K. and Heady, Earl O.. Aggregate Economic Effects of Alternative Land Retirement Programs: A Linear Programming Analysis, U.S. Department of Agriculture Tech. Bui. 1351, 1966.Google Scholar