Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:48:05.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Negative Externalities and Oil Spills: A Case for Reduced BrandValue to the State of Florida

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Sherry L. Larkin ,
Ray G. Huffaker  and
Rodney L. Clouser
Sherry L. Larkin
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics at the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Ray G. Huffaker
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics at the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Rodney L. Clouser
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics at the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Despite recent advances in measuring and compensating for environmentaldamages, several challenges remain. States have a vested interest inclaiming economic damages, especially those that reduce the value ofinvestments. Because place-brand values are considered personal property,Florida may seek additional compensation from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

Keywords

brandingnonmarket valuationOil Spill Pollution ActreputationK32Q51
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , August 2013 , pp. 389 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Assaf, G.B., Kroetch, B.G., and Mathur, S.C.. “Nonmarket Valuations of Accidental Oil Spills: A Survey of Economic and Legal Principles.” Marine Resource Economics 2(1986):211-37.Google Scholar
Baker, B. Twenty Benefits of a City Branding Strategy. Total Destination Marketing, 2010. Internet site: www.destinationbranding.com (Accessed January 30, 2013).Google Scholar
Bell, F.W. “Damage Assessment of the Tampa Bay Oil Spill: Travel Cost Method,” Chapter 6. Florida Coastal Environmental Resources: A Guide to Economic Valuation and Impact Analysis. Letson, D. and Milon, J.W., eds., pp. 53–62. Gainesville, FL: Rorida Sea Grant College Program, 2002.Google Scholar
Carson, R.T., Conaway, M.B., Hanemann, W.M., Krosnick, J.A., Mitchell, R.C., and Presser, S.. Valuing Oil Spill Prevention: A Case Study of California's Central Coast. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Goldberg, J.C.P. Liability for Economic Loss in Connection with the Deepwater Horizon Spill. Harvard University. DASH Repository, 53 pages, 2010. Internet site: http://ms.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4595438 (Accessed December 4, 2012).Google Scholar
Grigalunas, T.A., Anderson, R.C., Brown, G.M. Jr., Congar, R., Meade, N.F., and Sorensen, P.E.. “Nonmarket Valuations of Accidental Oil Spills: A Survey of Economic and Legal Principles.” Marine Resource Economics 2(1986):239-62.Google Scholar
Heymann, L. “The Law of Reputation and the Interest of the Audience.” Boston College Law Review. Boston College. Law School 52(2011):1341-439.Google Scholar
Loureiro, M.L., Loomis, J.B., and Vasquez, M.X.. “Economic Valuation of Environmental Damages due to the Prestige Oil Spill in Spain.” Environmental and Resource Economics 44(2009):537-53.10.1007/s10640-009-9300-xGoogle Scholar
Mills, J., McLendon, T., Klein, J., and Vazuez, D.. “MEMO Re: Oil Spill Response Requirements & Administrative Infrastructure. Chapter 1. Legal and Policy Issues from the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: Moving from Response to Recovery. Report to the Mcintosh Foundation. Prepared by The Center for Governmental Responsibility, University of Florida Levin College of Law, Gainesville, FL, 2011.Google Scholar
Olenski, S. Did the Penn State Brand Get the Death Penalty ? LiveScience, 2012. Internet site: http://www.business2community.com/branding/did-the-penn-state-brand-get-the-death-penalty-0242484 (Accessed January 30, 2013).Google Scholar
Olexa, M.T., and Broome, Z.. Handbook of Florida Water Regulation: Florida Pollutant Discharge Prevention and Control Act. EDIS document FE585. Florida Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 2005. Internet site: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu (Accessed November 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Palmer, V.V. “The Great Spill in the Gulf … and a Sea of Pure Economic Loss: Reflections on the Boundaries of Civil Liability.” Penn State Law Review 116(2011):105-43.Google Scholar
Post, R. “The Social Foundation of Defamation Law: Reputation and the Constitution.” California Law Review 74(1986):691–742.10.2307/3480391Google Scholar
Quimby, P.A. “Analyzing Uncertainty: Issues of Purely Economic Losses and Preemption Facing Individuals Injured by an Oil Spill.” Sea Grant Law and Policy Journal 4(2011):79–113.Google Scholar
Rooney, J. How Florida Bounced Back from the Oil Spill. Advertising Age, 2011. Internet site: http://adage.com (Accessed November 15, 2012). Published January 3, 2011.Google Scholar
Ross, A. “Florida's New Tourism Ads Ditch Promise of Clean Shore.” The Palm Beach Post, June 4, 2010.Google Scholar
Stewart, R.B. “The Oil Spill Commission: Statement of Richard B. Stewart.” New York University School of Law. Presentation draft. September 28, 2010. Internet site: https://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website_news_media/documents/documents/ecm_pro_066980.pdf (Accessed November 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Tan, M. “The Hard Science of Branding.” The Business Times Singapore, July 21, 2011. Singapore Press Holdings Ltd.Google Scholar
The Burghard Group. BP Damages More Than Its Own Brand. 2010. Internet site: http:// strengtheningbrandamerica.com (Accessed December 3, 2012).Google Scholar
Voegele, A., and Sedimayr, R.. “Willingness to Pay: How the Microeconomic Tool Box Applies to Brand Valuation.” International Tax Review (2007):3–6.Google Scholar