Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:24:26.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Multi-Period Analysis of Two Common Livestock Management Strategies Given Fluctuating Precipitation and Variable Prices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

John P. Ritten ,
W. Marshall Frasier ,
Christopher T. Bastian ,
Steven I. Paisley ,
Michael A. Smith  and
Siân Mooney
John P. Ritten
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY
W. Marshall Frasier
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
Christopher T. Bastian
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY
Steven I. Paisley
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY
Michael A. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Renewable Resources, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY
Siân Mooney
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Boise State University, Boise, ID
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many areas of the US recently endured a severe drought and management strategies to cope with the lack of forage production varied. A multi-period mathematical model is presented that estimates the outcomes of two common producer responses to changes in precipitation, partial liquidation and purchasing hay, given fluctuating cattle prices over a long term planning horizon. Results were further summarized with regression analysis and selected elasticities were calculated to reflect the sensitivity of outcomes to variability in precipitation and livestock prices. Although little impact was seen from utilizing additional hay as a strategy during drought, producers who follow this strategy are in a position to market more animals immediately post drought in general, resulting in better long run financial outcomes. Elasticity estimates suggest that profitability is more sensitive to variability in prices but that optimal choices of management strategies are more sensitive to variability in precipitation.

Keywords

Drought managementmathematical programmingherd liquidationprice cyclecattle managementQ12C61D24
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 177 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bastian, C.T., Mooney, S., Nagler, A.M., Hewlett, J.P., Paisley, S.I., Smith, M.A., Frasier, W.M., and Umberger, W.J. “Cattle Ranchers Diverse in Their Drought Management Strategies.” Western Economics Forum 5(2006):1–8.Google Scholar
Bastian, C.T., Ponnamanneni, P., Mooney, S., Ritten, J.P., Frasier, W.M., Paisley, S.I., Smith, M.A., and Umberger, W.J. “Range Livestock Strategies Given Extended Drought and Different Price Cycles” Journal of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers 72,1(2009):153–63.Google Scholar
Carande, V.G., Bartlett, E.T., and Gutierrez, P.H. “Optimization of Rangeland Management Strategies under Rainfall and Price Risks.” Journal of Range Management 48(1995):68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattle-Fax Inc. Unpublished data. Centennial, CO. Internet site: http://www.cattlefax.com/ (Accessed August 21, 2007).Google Scholar
Garoian, L., Mjelde, J.W., and Conner, J.R. “Optimal Strategies for Marketing Calves and Yearlings from Rangeland.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72,2(1990):604–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C.R., and Carpenter, B.B. “Stocking Rate and Grazing Management.” Texas Agricultural Extension Service Publication E-64, 2005.Google Scholar
Holecheck, J.L. “Financial Returns from Grazing Different Management Systems in New Mexico.” Rangelands 16(1994):237–40.Google Scholar
May, G.J., Van, L.W. Tassell, Smith, M.A., and Waggoner, J.W. “Optimal Feed Cost Strategies Associated with Early and Late Calving Seasons.” Paper presented at the conference of the American Agricultural Economics Association annual meetings, Salt Lake City, UT, August 2- 5, 1998.Google Scholar
Murugan, S. “Profit Maximizing Livestock Production and Marketing Strategies to Manage Climate Variability.” M.S. thesis. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, 2007.Google Scholar
Nagler, A., Bastian, C., Hewlett, J.P., Mooney, S., Paisley, S.I., Smith, M.A., Frasier, M., Umberger, W., and Ponnameneni, P.Multiple Impacts, Multiple Strategies: How Wyoming Cattle Producers are Surviving in Prolonged Drought. Laramie: University of Wyoming, Cooperative Extension Service, 2007.Google Scholar
Nagler, A., Mooney, S., Bastian, C., Hewlett, J.P., Aldridge, B., Sarchet, B.A., Umberger, W., Frasier, M., Paisley, S.I., Smith, M.A., Ponnameneni, P., Taylor, D.T., and Foulke, T.Wyoming Beef Cattle Producers Survey – Final Report. Laramie: Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wyoming, June 2006. Internet site: http://agecon.uwyo.edu/WYLive-stock/FINALReport.pdf (Accessed April 24, 2008).Google Scholar
National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). National Oceanic and Atmospheric administration (NOAA). Internet site: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html (Accessed June 6, 2007).Google Scholar
Parseti, L.D., Popp, M.P., and Loewer, O.J. “Stocking Rate Risk for Pasture-Fed Steers Under Weather Uncertainty.” Journal of Range Management 50(1997):541–49.Google Scholar
Ramsey, R., Doye, D., Ward, C., McGrann, J., Falconer, L., and Bevers, S. “Factors Affecting Beef Cow-Herd Costs, Production, and Profits.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37,1(2005):851–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robb, J.Personal Communication. Livestock Marketing Information Center (LMIC), Lake-wood, CO, June 2007.Google Scholar
Smith, M.A.Drought Prediction Model Development and Dissemination in Wyoming. Report for 2002WY7B, 2005. Internet site: http://water.usgs.gov/wrri/04grants/Progress%20Completion%20Reports/2002WY7B.pdf (Accessed April 24, 2008).Google Scholar
Stockton, M.C., and Wilson, R.K. “Simulated Analysis of Drought's Impact on Different Cow-Calf Production Systems.” Paper presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association meetings, Mobile, AL, February 4-7, 2007.Google Scholar
Taylor, D., Coupai, R., and Foulke, T. “The Economic Importance of Livestock Grazing on BLM Land in Fremont County, Wyoming.” Project Report. Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, College of Agriculture, University of Wyoming, October 2004. Internet site: http://agecon.uwyo.edu/Econdev/PubStorage/Fremont%2C)Comity%2C)final26C)ct04.pdf (Accessed June 17, 2009).Google Scholar
Torell, L.A., Tanaka, J.A., Rimbey, N., Darden, T., Van Tassell, L., and Harp, A.Ranch-Level Impacts of Changing Grazing Policies on BLM Land to Protect the Greater Sage-Grouse: Evidence from Idaho, Nevada and Oregon. PACWPL Policy Paper SG-01-02. Caldwell, Idaho: Policy Analysis Center for Western Public Lands, 2001.Google Scholar
Ward, CE., Vestal, M.K., Doye, D.G., and Lalman, D.L. “Factors Affecting Adoption of Cow-Calf Production Practices in Oklahoma.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40,3(2008):851–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyoming Agricultural Statistics Service (WASS). Internet site: http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Wyoming/index.asp (Accessed May 30, 2007).Google Scholar