Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:49:06.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impacts of Price Changes on Optimal Feeding Periods for Slaughter Yearlings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

D. L. McLemore  and
W. T. Butts
D. L. McLemore
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee. Knoxville
W. T. Butts
Affiliation:
Beef Cattle Breeding and Genetics, SEA. USDA, Knoxville, Tennessee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The economic theory to be applied in optimizing feeding periods for finishing slaughter cattle is well developed both for cases in which only one group of cattle is finished and for cases in which each group of finished animals sold is replaced in the feedlot by another group of feeder animals [3, pp. 71–76; 4]. According to received theory the operator who plans to replace the finished animal with another feeder should feed to the point in time at which marginal net revenue equals average net revenue (maximizes returns to time). The operator who does not intend to replace the finished animal with another should continue feeding until marginal net revenue is zero (maximizes returns to the animal).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , December 1979 , pp. 27 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Chemical Rubber Company. Standard Mathematical Tables, Fifteenth Edition, Cleveland, Ohio, 1967.Google Scholar
[2]Cross, H. R., Carpenter, Z. L., and Smith, G. C.. “Equations for Estimating Boneless Retail Cut Yields from Beef Carcasses,” Journal of Animal Science, Volume 37, December, 1973, pp. 1267–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Dillon, John L.The Analysis of Response in Crop and Livestock Production, First Edition. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1968.Google Scholar
[4]Faris, J. E. “Analytical Techniques Used in Determining the Optimum Replacement Pattern, “Journal of Farm Economics, Volume 42, November 1960, pp. 755–766.Google Scholar
[5]Draper, N. R. and Smith, H.. Applied Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
[6]Hedrick, H. B., Stringer, W. C., and Krause, G. F., “Retail Yield Comparison of Average Good and Average Choice Confirmation Beef Carcasses,” Journal of Animal Science, Volume 28, February 1969, pp. 187–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Jeremiah, L. E., Smith, G. C., and Hillers, J. K.. “Utilization of Breed and Traits Determined from the Live Beef Steer for Prediction of Marbling Score,” Journal of Animal Science, Volume 31, December 1970, pp. 1089–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Kauffman, R. G., Suess, G. G., Bray, R. W., and Scarth, R. D.. “Incidence of Marbling in the Bovine and Porcine Longissimus,“ Journal of Animal Science, Volume 27, July 1968, pp. 969–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kmenta, Jan. Elements of Econometrics. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1971.Google Scholar
[10]Nelson, K. E. and Purcell, W. D.. “A Quantitative Approach to the Feedlot Replacement Decision,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 4, July 1972, pp. 143–149.Google Scholar
[11]Nelson, K. E. and Purcell, W. D.. “A Comparison of Liveweight, Carcass and Lean Meat Criteria for the Feedlot Replacement Decision,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 5, December 1973, pp. 99–107.Google Scholar
[12]Onks, Dennis O. “Nutritional Efficiency of Angus Cow-Calf Unit,” PhD dissertation, University of Tennessee, August 1976.Google Scholar
[13]Rawls, Emmit L. Variously titled quarterly mimeograph series “Feeder Cattle Sale Summary,” Agricultural Extension Service, University of Tennessee, 1976 and 1977.Google Scholar
[14]Ray, R. M. and Walch, H. N.. Farm Planning Manual, EC622, Agricultural Extension Service, University of Tennessee, April 1978.Google Scholar
[15]Scarth, R. D., Kauffman, R. G., and Bray, R. W.. “Effects of Breed and Age Classification on Live Weight and Carcass Traits of Steers Shown at International Quality Beef Show,” Journal of Animal Science, Volume 36, April 1973, pp. 653–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]U. S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock Marketing Handbook, AMS-556, Livestock Division, Agricultural Marketing Service, Washington, October 1973.Google Scholar
[17]U. S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock Meat Wool Market News Weekly Summary and Statistics, Volume 44, Numbers 1-52, Agricultural Marketing Service, Washington, 1976.Google Scholar
[18]Zinn, D. W. “Quantitative and Qualitative Beef Carcass Characteristics as Influenced by Time on Feed,” PhD dissertation, University of Missouri, June 1967.Google Scholar
[19]Zinn, D. W., Durham, R. M., and H. B. Hedrick. “Feedlot and Carcass Grade Characteristics of Steers and Heifers as Influenced by Days on Feed,” Journal of Animal Science, Volume 31, August 1970, pp. 302–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar