Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T12:34:39.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impacts of Incorporating Land Exchanges Between Forestry and Agriculture in Sector Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ralph J. Alig ,
Darius M. Adams  and
Bruce A. McCarl
Ralph J. Alig
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, Oregon
Darius M. Adams
Affiliation:
College of Forestry, Oregon State University
Bruce A. McCarl
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The forest and agriculture sectors are linked by having a portion of their land bases suitable for use in either sector. A substantial part of the southern land base is suitable for either forestry or agriculture use, with most of forestation on U.S. agriculture land in the South. We examine how land exchanges between forestry and agriculture are influenced by specific federal conservation and farm support policies, including changes in the Conservation Reserve Program. Reallocation of land is a significant part of the sectors' responses to the policies, along with intensification of timber management on existing southern forests.

Keywords

agricultureconservationforest sectorland useprojections
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , December 1998 , pp. 389 - 401
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R., Adams, D., Callaway, J., Chang, C., and McCarl, B.. “Sequestering Carbon on Agricultural Land: Social Costs and Impacts on Timber Markets.” Contemporary Policy Issues XI(1993):76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, D., Alig, R., Callaway, J., McCarl, B., and Winnett, S.. “The Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model (FASOM):Model Structure and Policy Simulations.” Res. Pap. No. PNW-RP-495, USDA/Forest Service, Portland OR, 1996a.Google Scholar
Adams, D., Alig, R., McCarl, B., Callaway, J., and Winnett, S.. “An Analysis of the Impacts of Public Timber Harvest Policies on Private Forest Management in the U.S.” Forest Sci. 43,3(1996b):343-58.Google Scholar
Adams, D., and Haynes, R.. “The 1993 Timber Assessment Market Model: Structure, Projections, and Policy Simulations.” Gen. Tech. Rep. No. PNW-GTR-368, USDA/Forest Service, Portland OR, 1996.Google Scholar
Alig, R., Adams, D., McCarl, B., Callaway, J., and Winnett, S.. “Assessing Effects of Mitigation Strategies for Global Climate Change with an Intertemporal Model of the U.S. Forest and Agriculture Sectors.” Environ, and Resour. Econ. 9(1997):259-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alig, R., and Healy, R.. “Urban and Built-up Land Area Changes in the United States: An Empirical Investigation of Determinants.” Land Econ. 63(1987):215-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alig, R., and Wear, D.. “Changes in Private Timberlands: Statistics and Projections for 1952 to 2040.” J. Forestry 90(1992):31–37.Google Scholar
Binkley, C. “Economic Models of Timber Supply.” In The Global Forest Sector: An Analytical Perspective, eds., Kallio, M., Dykstra, D., and Binkley, C., pp. 109-36. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1987.Google Scholar
Brooke, A., Kendrick, D., and Meeraus, A.. GAMS: A User's Guide, Release 2.25. San Francisco: The Scientific Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Chang, C., McCarl, B., Mjelde, J., and Richardson, J.. “Sectoral Implications of Farm Program Modifications.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 74(1992):38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comolli, P. “Principles and Policy in Forestry Economics.” Bell J. Econ. 12(1981):300-09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, R., Adams, D., and Mills, J.. “The 1993 RPA Timber Assessment Update.” Gen. Tech. Rep. No. RM-259, USDA/Forest Service, Ft. Collins CO, 1995.Google Scholar
Ince, P. “Recycling and Long-Range Timber Outlook.” Gen. Tech. Rep. No. RM-242, USDA/Forest Service, Ft. Collins CO, 1994.Google Scholar
Johnson, N., and Scheurman, L.. Techniques for Prescribing Optimal Timber Harvests and Investment Under Different Objectives. Forest Science Monograph No. 18, Society of American Foresters, Washington DC, 1977.Google Scholar
McCarl, B. “Cropping Activities in Agricultural Sector Models: A Methodological Proposal.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 64(1982):768-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarl, B., Chang, C., Atwood, J., and Nayda, W.. “ASM: The U.S. Agricultural Sector Model.” Draft report, Dept. of Agr. Econ., Texas A&M University, College Station, 1997.Google Scholar
McCarl, B., and Spreen, T.. “Price Endogenous Mathematical Programming as a Tool for Sector Analysis.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 62(1980):87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, W., Womack, A., Johnson, S., Brandt, J., and Young, R.. “Impacts of Alternative Programs Indicated by the FAPRI Analysis.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 69(1987):972-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, J., and Kincaid, J.. “The Aggregate TimberLand Analysis System—ATLAS: A Comprehensive Timber Projection Model.” Gen. Tech. Rep. No. PNW-GTR-281, USDA/Forest Service, Portland OR, 1992.Google Scholar
Parks, P., and Hardie, I.. “Least-Cost Forest Carbon Reserves: Cost-Effective Subsidies to Convert Marginal Agricultural Land to Forests.” Land Econ. 71(1995):122-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedjo, R., and Lyon, K.. The Long-Term Adequacy of World Timber Supply. Washington DC: Resources for the Future, 1990.Google Scholar
Takayama, T., and Judge, G.. Spatial and Temporal Price and Allocation Models. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1971.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. “The 1992 National Resource Inventory in the United States.” Unnumbered rep., USDA/NRCS, Washington DC, 1996.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. “The Second RCA Appraisal: Soil, Water, and Related Resources on Nonfederal Land in the United States—Analysis of Conditions and Trends.” Unnumbered rep., USDA/SCS, Washington DC, 1989.Google Scholar
Vesterby, M., Heimlich, R., and Krupa, K.. “Urbanization of Rural Land in the United States.“ Agr. Econ. Rep. No. 673, USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington DC, 1994.Google Scholar