Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T00:59:37.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Market Concentration on Lamb Marketing Margins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Gary W. Brester  and
Douglas C. Mustek
Gary W. Brester
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University
Douglas C. Mustek
Affiliation:
Sheridan County, Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The national four-firm concentration ratio in the lamb slaughtering and processing industry increased from 55 percent in 1980 to 70 percent in 1992. The effect of increasing lamb packer concentration on lamb marketing margins is examined. A relative price spread (RPS) model for farm-to-wholesale and wholesale-to-retail marketing margins was estimated using three-stage least squares (3SLS). The 3SLS results indicate that increased lamb packer concentration has had relatively small, positive effects on lamb marketing margins.

Keywords

lamb industrymarket concentrationmarketing margins
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , July 1995 , pp. 172 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Sheep Industry Council, Inc. Personal Communication with various staff members, Denver Colorado, 1992.Google Scholar
Arzac, E.R., and Wilkinson, M.. “A Quarterly Econometric Model of United States Livestock and Feed Grain Markets and Some of its Policy Implications.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 61(1979): 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botkin, M.P., Field, R.A., and Johnson, C.L.. Sheep and Wool. Science. Production, and Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988.Google Scholar
Brorsen, B.W., Chavas, J.-P., Grant, W.R., and Schnake, L.D.. “Marketing Margins and Price Uncertainty: The Case of the U.S. Wheat Market.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 67(1985): 521–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brester, G.W., and Marsh, J.M.. “A Statistical Model of the Primary and Derived Market Levels in the U.S. Beef Industry.” W. J. Agr. Econ., 8(1983): 34–49.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. “Two Systems of Belief About Monopoly.” Industrial Concentration: The New Learning, ed. Goldschmid, H., Mann, H.M., and Weston, J.F.. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1974.Google Scholar
Faminow, M.D., and Laubscher, J.M.. “Empirical Testing of Alternative Price Spread Models in the South African Maize Market.” Agr. Econ., 6(1991): 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, B.L. “The Farm-Retail Price Spread in a Competitive Food Industry.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 57(1975): 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, K. and Magleby, R.. Characteristics of Sheep Production in the Western United States. USDA, Economic Research Service. Agricultural Economic Report No. 345 Washington, D.C, 1977.Google Scholar
Holt, M.T. “Risk Response in the Beef Marketing Channel: A Multivariate Generalized ARCH-M Approach.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 75(1993): 559–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langemeier, L.N., and Delano, F.D.. “The Enterprise Analysis Report: 1991 Management Information.” Kansas Farm Management Associations, Department of Agricultural Economics, Cooperative Extension Service, Kansas State University, Manhattan, p. 15.Google Scholar
Livestock Marketing Information Center. Personal communication with staff members. November, 1992.Google Scholar
Limdep. LIMDEP User's Manual and Reference Guide, Version 6.0. Greene, W.H.. Bellport, NY: Econometric Software, Inc. 1992.Google Scholar
Lyon, G.D., and Thompson, G.D.. “Temporal and Spatial Aggregation: Alternative Marketing Margin Models.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 75(1993): 523–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, K., and Lemon, R.. Review of the Pricing and Marketing Process for Lamb in the U.S. Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry of the Committee on Agriculture, One Hundred Second Congress, First Session, Sept. 18, 1991, Denver, CO and Oct. 31, 1991, Washington, DC. Serial No. 102–36. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington: 1992.Google Scholar
Menkhaus, D.J., Whipple, G.D., and Ward, C.E.. “Concentration in the Lamb Slaughtering Industry: Impact on Lamb Prices.” SID Sheep Research Journal. 6(1989): 25–29.Google Scholar
SAS Institute, Inc. SAS/ETS User's Guide. Version 6. First Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc. 1988.Google Scholar
Texas Agricultural Market Research Center. Assessment of Marketing Strategies to Enhance Returns to Lamb Producers. TAMRC Commodity Market Report No. CM-1-91, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. December, 1991.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock and Meat Statistics. Washington, D.C, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock and Poultry Outlook and Situation. Washington, D.C, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Survey of Current Business. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Washington, D.C, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor. CPI Detailed Report. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Washington, D.C, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor. Employment and Earnings of the United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Washington, D.C, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor. Producer Price Indexes. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Washington, D.C, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives. Review of the Pricing and Marketing Process for Lamb in the U.S. Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry of the Committee on Agriculture, One Hundred Second Congress, First Session, Sept. 18, 1991, Denver, CO and Oct. 31, 1991, Washington, DC. Serial No. 102–36. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington: 1992.Google Scholar
Walker Research and Analysis. 1988 Lamb Usage and Awareness Study. Sterling-Rice Group and the American Lamb Council. Study No. WR22386. October, 1988.Google Scholar
Ward, C.E. “An Empirical Study of Competition in the Price Discovery Process for Slaughter Lambs.” West. J. Agr. Econ., 9(1984): 135–144.Google Scholar
Ward, C.E.. Meatpacking Industry Changes: Causes and Consequences. A.E. Paper 92137. Department of Agricultural Economics, Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Oklahoma State University. December, 1992.Google Scholar
Western Organization of Resource Councils Education Project. Where's the Meat? Changes in the Livestock feeding and Packing Industries in the West. July, 1991.Google Scholar
Wohlgenant, M.K., and Mullen, J.D.. “Modeling the Farm-Retail Price Spread for Beef.” West. J. Agr. Econ., 12(1987): 119–125.Google Scholar