Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:35:40.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does FCS Association Size Affect Credit Availability?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Charles Dodson  and
Marvin Duncan
Charles Dodson
Affiliation:
USDA Farm Service Agency
Marvin Duncan
Affiliation:
USDA's Office of Energy in Washington, D.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An analysis of the characteristics of farm businesses by size of FCS direct lending association suggests that further consolidation of FCS lending should have limited negative impacts on credit availability. Commercial-sized farm businesses with FCS real estate debt appeared similar to those who obtained credit from competing lenders, but smaller associations and those with fewer stockholders per branch appeared to serve larger and more wealthy commercial-sized farms.

Keywords

credit availabilitydirect lending association
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , August 1999 , pp. 229 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, Allen N. and Udell, Gregory F.. “Universal Banking and the Future of Small Business Lending.” In Saunders, Anthony and Walter, Ingo, eds., Universal Banking: Financial System Design Reconsidered. Burr Ridge, Illinois: Irwin Publishing, 1996.Google Scholar
Berger, Allen N., Saunders, Anthony, Scalise, Joseph M., and Udell, Gregory F.. “The Effects of Bank Mergers and Acquisitions on Small Business Lending.” In Saunders, Anthony and Walter, Ingo, eds., Universal Banking: Financial System Design Reconsidered. Burr Ridge, Illinois: Irwin Publishing, 1996.Google Scholar
Cole, Rebel, and Wolken, John D.. “Financial Services Used by Small Business: Evidence from the 1993 Survey of Small Business Finance.” Federal Reserve Bulletin 81(1995):629–667.Google Scholar
Dodson, Charles B. and Koenig, Steve. “Niche Lending in Agriculture.” Journal of Agricultural Lending. American Bankers Association 2(4), (Summer 1983).Google Scholar
Duncan, M., and Dodson, C., “Farm Credit System Structure and Performance: What Is the Evidence on Association Diversity or Uniformity,” Regional Research Committee NC-207 Meeting on Regulatory, Efficiency, and Management Issues Affecting Rural Financial Markets, Denver, Colorado, Oct. 6–7, 1997, 27 pp.Google Scholar
Keeton, William R. “Do Bank Mergers Reduce Lending to Businesses and Farmers? New Evidence From Tenth District States” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Economic Review 79:3(1996):64–75.Google Scholar
Keeton, William R. “Multi-Office Bank Lending to Small Businesses: Some New Evidence,” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Economic Review 80:2(1995):45–57.Google Scholar
Levonian, Mark and Soller, Jennifer. “Small Banks, Small Loans, Small Business.” FRBSF Weekly Letter (1995)96–102.Google Scholar
Peek, and Rosengren, . “Small Business Credit Availability: How Important Is the Size of the Lender?” In Saunders, Anthony and Walter, Ingo, eds., Universal Banking: Financial System Design Reconsidered. Burr Ridge, Illinois: Irwin Publishing, 1996.Google Scholar
Sommer, Judith E., Hoppe, Robert A., Green, Robert C., Korb, Penelope J.. “Structural and Financial Characteristics of U.S. Farms, 20th Annual Family Farm Report to the Congress”. Resource Economics Division. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. AIB 746, 1995.Google Scholar
Strahan, Philip E. and Weston, James. “Small Business Lending and Bank Consolidation: Is There Cause for Concern?” Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Current Issues in Economics and Finance, March 1996.Google Scholar