Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:40:55.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing the Market for Poultry Litter in Georgia: AreSubsidies Needed to Protect Water Quality?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Jeffrey Mullen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Ulugbek Bekchanov
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Berna Karali
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
David Kissel
Affiliation:
Soil, Plant and Water Lab, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Mark Risse
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Kristin Rowles
Affiliation:
Georgia Water Planning and Policy Center, Albany, Georgia
Sam Collier
Affiliation:
Georgia Water Planning and Policy Center, Albany, Georgia

Abstract

Concerns about nutrient loads into our waters have focused attention onpoultry litter applications. Like many states with a large poultry industry,Georgia recently designed a subsidy program to facilitate the transportationof poultry litter out of vulnerable watersheds. This paper uses atransportation model to examine the necessity of a poultry litter subsidy toachieve water protection goals in Georgia. We also demonstrate therelationship between diesel and synthetic fertilizer prices and the value ofpoultry litter. Results suggest that a well-functioning market would be ableto remove excess litter from vulnerable watersheds in the absence of asubsidy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baranyai, V., and Bradley, S.Turning Chesapeake Bay Poultry Manure and Litter into Energy,” Chesapeake Bay Program Report CPB/TRS-289-08, January 2008.AMBIGUOUS (830868 citations)Google Scholar
Carpenter, S.R., Carrell, N.F., Howarth, R.W., Sharpley, A.N., and Smith, V.H.Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen.” Ecological Applications 8(1998):559–68.10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
Carreira, R.I., Young, K.B., Goodwin, H.L. Jr., and Wailes, E.J.How Far Can Poultry Litter Go? A New Technology for Litter Transport.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39(2007):611–23.S1074070800023300Google Scholar
Collins, A.R., and Basden, T.A Policy Evaluation of Transport Subsidies for Poultry Litter in West Virginia.” Review of Agricultural Economics 28(2006):72–88.10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00274.xGoogle Scholar
Collins, A.R., and Basden, T.Effects of Poultry Litter Application Rate and Rainfall Intensity on Quality of Runoff from Fescue grass Plots.” Journal of Environmental Quality 22(1993):361–65.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.L., Lander, C.H., Moffitt, D.C., and Gollehon, N. Manure Nutrients Relative to the Capacity of Cropland and Pastureland to Assimilate Nutrients: Spatial and Temporal Trends for the U.S. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2000. 140 pp.Google Scholar
Kissel, D., Risse, M., Sonon, L., and Harris, G.Calculating the Fertilizer Value of Broiler Litter.” University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Circular C933, November 2008.Google Scholar
Kleinman, P.J., and Sharpley, A.N.Effect of Broadcast Manure on Runoff Phosphorus Concentrations of Successive Rainfall Events.” Journal of Environmental Quality 32(2003):1072–81.10.2134/jeq2003.107212809308Google Scholar
Lander, C.H., Moffitt, D., and Alt, K.Nutrients Available from Livestock Manure Relative to Crop Growth Requirements.” Resource Assessment and Strategic Planning Working Paper 98-1, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, February 1998.AMBIGUOUS (470949 citations)Google Scholar
Lemunyon, J.L., and Gilbert, R.G.The Concept and Need for a Phosphorous Assessment Tool.” Journal of Production Agriculture 6(1993):483–86.Google Scholar
Mokolobate, M.S., and Haynes, R.J.Comparative Liming Effects of Four Organic Residues Applied to an Acid Soil.” Biology and Fertility of Soils 35(2002):79–85.10.1007/s00374-001-0439-zGoogle Scholar
National Resources Conservation Service. The Phosphorous Index: A Phosphorous Assessment Tool. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Technical Note, Series No. 1901, 1994.Google Scholar
Paudel, K.P., Adhikari, M., and Martin, N.R. Jr., “Evaluation of Broiler Litter Transportation in Northern Alabama, USA.” Journal of Environmental Management 73(2004):15–23.10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.05.00315327843Google Scholar
Pote, D.H., Daniel, T.C., Nichlos, D.J., Sharpley, A.N., More, P.A. Jr., Miller, D.M., and Edwards, D.R.Relationship between Phosphorus Levels in Three Ultisols and Phosphorus Concentrations in Runoff.” Journal of Environmental Quality 28(1999):170–75.Google Scholar
Schindler, D.W.The Evolution of Phosphorus Limitation in Lakes.” Science 195(1977):260–62.10.1126/science.195.4275.26017787798Google Scholar
Vest, L., Merka, B., and Segars, W.I.Poultry Waste: Georgia's 50 Million Dollar Forgotten Crop.” Georgia Cooperative Extension Leaflet 206. Athens, GA, 1994.AMBIGUOUS (435150 citations)Google Scholar
Willet, K., Mitchell, D.M., Goodwin, H.L., Vieux, B., and Popp, J.S.The Opportunity Cost of Regulating Phosphorous from Broiler Production in the Illinois River Basin.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 49(2006):181207.10.1080/09640560500507884Google Scholar