Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:38:15.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applications of Social Capital Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

A. Allan Schmid  and
Lindon J. Robison
A. Allan Schmid
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University
Lindon J. Robison
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments and studies were conducted to investigate the role of social capital. Social capital (relationship to others) is a productive asset which is a substitute for and complement to other productive assets. The productivity of social capital leads to the expectation that firms and individuals invest in relationships. Data were collected to answer the following questions: Does the identity (relationship) of trading partners affect selling and buying prices; the acceptance of catastrophic risk; the choice of share or cash leases in agriculture; loan approval; and banks investment to retain customers? The evidence is in the afffirmative.

Keywords

behavioral economicsinstitutional economicssocial capital
Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , July 1995 , pp. 59 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coleman, James S. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology. 94(Supplement 1988):S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Robert. “The Strategic Role of the Emotions.” Rationality and Society. 5(1993): 160–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwilliam, Kent. Farmland Leasing and Contract Choice in Michigan: The Influence of Social Distance. Ph.D. Thesis. Michigan State University, East Lansing, 1993.Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, Jack. “The Dark Side of the Force.” Economic Inquiry. 32(1994): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Howard. Patterns, Thinking, and Cognition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Robison, Lindon J.Social Capital and Catastrophic Risk Responses. Sandia National Laboratories and Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural Economics, 1993.Google Scholar
Robison, Lindon J., and Hanson, Steven. “Social Capital and Economic Cooperation.” J. Agr. and Applied Econ. July (1995).Google Scholar
Robison, Lindon J., and Allan Schmid, A.. “Interpersonal Relationships and Preferences.” Frantz, Roger, et al. eds., Handbook of Behavioral Economics. Vol. 2B, pp. 347–360. Greenwich CT: JAI Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Robison, Lindon J., and Allan Schmid, A.. “Can Agriculture Prosper Without Increased Social Capital?” Choices. Fourth Quarter: 29–31, 1994.Google Scholar
Samuels, Warren J. “Institutional Economics and the Theory of Cognition.” Cambridge J. of Econ. 14:219–227, 1990.Google Scholar
Siles, Marcelo, Hanson, Steven, and Robison, Lindon. “Socioeconomics and the Probability of Loan Approval.” Rev. of Ag. Econ., 16:363–372, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siles, Marcelo, Robison, Lindon, and Hanson, Steven. “Why Do Banks Advertise?” Bank Marketing. December, 1993.Google Scholar
Siles, Marcelo, Robison, Lindon, and Hanson, Steven. “Does Friendly Service Retain Customers?” Bank Marketing. January, 1994.Google Scholar