Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:35:50.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Analysis of U.S. Farm Income Policies: Historical, Market-Determined, and Sector-Wide Stabilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Howard McDowell ,
Randall A. Kramer  and
J. Michael Price
Howard McDowell
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Randall A. Kramer
Affiliation:
Center for Resource and Environmental Policy Research, Duke University
J. Michael Price
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper provides an economic analysis of the historical agricultural price and income support policy, a policy of market-determined prices and income, and a policy linking market-determined prices with sector-wide farm income stabilization in years of economic disaster. The analysis compares commodity prices, net farm income, and government expenditures over the period 1970 through 1982 based on estimates generated by USDA's Food and Agricultural Policy Simulator (FAPSIM). The historical policy generates the highest income and most stable prices. Market-determined income is lowest and has the greatest variability. Stabilization minimized income variability at intermediate income levels.

Keywords

agricultural policyprice stabilizationincome stabilizationdecoupling
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , December 1989 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batie, S.S. “Agriculture as the Problem: New Agenda and New Opportunities.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 20(1988):1–11.Google Scholar
Benedict, M.R. Farm Policies of the United States, 1790-1950. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund, 1953.Google Scholar
Blisard, W.N. and Blaylock, J.R.. Generic Promotion of Agricultural Products, Balancing Producers' and Consumers' Needs. USDA, Economic Research Service, Agriculture Information Bulletin 565, 1989.Google Scholar
Cochrane, W.W. and Ryan, M.E.. American Farm Policy 1948-1973. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Dunham, D. Food Cost Review, 1985. National Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report No. 559, 1986.Google Scholar
Duncan, M. and Harrington, D.H.. “Farm Financial Stress: Extent and Causes.” In Farm Credit Policy Options and Consequences. Virginia Cooperative Extension Service, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg. Publication 446-045, March 1986.Google Scholar
Froker, R.K. “A Price Policy for Agriculture, Consistent with Economic Progress, That Will Promote Adequate and More Stable Income from Farming.” J. Farm Econ., 27(1945):844–851.Google Scholar
Gardner, B.L. The Economics of Agricultural Policies. New York: MacMillan, 1987a.Google Scholar
Gardner, B.L. “Causes of U.S. Farm Commodity Programs.” J. Political Econ., 95(1987b):290–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heifner, R.A. Armbruster, W., Jesse, E., Nelson, G., and Shafer, C.. A Review of Federal Marketing Orders for Fruits and Vegetables, and Specialty Crops: Economic Efficiency and Welfare Implications. AMS, USDA, Ag. Econ. Report 477. Washington D.C. Nov. 1981.Google Scholar
Henderson, J.M. and Quandt, R.E.. Microeconomic Theory: A Mathematical Approach. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.Google Scholar
Ippolito, R.A. and Masson, R.T.. “The Social Cost of Government Regulation of Milk.” The Journal of Law and Economics, 21(1978):33–65.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. Prescott, R., Banker, D., and Morehart, M.. Financial Characteristics of U.S. Farms, January 1, 1986. National Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Information Bulletin, Number 500. Washington D.C. 1986 Google Scholar
Kelly, A.H. and Harbison, W.A.. The American Constitution, Its Origins and Development. New York: W.W. Norton and Co., 1976.Google Scholar
Melichar, E. “A Financial Perspective on Agriculture.” Federal Reserve Bulletin, (January 1984):1–13.Google Scholar
Orden, D. “Agriculture, Trade, and Macroeconomics: The U.S. Case.” Journal of Policy Modeling, 8(1986)27–61.Google Scholar
Newbery, D.M.G. and Stiglitz, J.E.. The Theory of Commodity Price Stabilization: A Study in the Economics of Risk. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Salathe, L.E. Price, J.M., and Gadson, K.E.. “The Food and Agricultural Policy Simulator.” Agricultural Economics Research, 34,1(1982):1–15.Google Scholar
Salathe, L.E. Price, J.M., and Gadson, K.E.. “The Food and Agricultural Policy Simulator: An Addendum.” Agricultural Economics Research, 35, 3(1983):40–42.Google Scholar
Schertz, L.P. and Clayton, K.C.. “Alternatives to Current Commodity Programs.” In Restructuring Policy for Agriculture: Some Alternatives—Papers from a Symposium. Ed. Batie, S.S. and Marshall, J.P.. Blacksburg, Virginia: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Information Series 84-2, May 1984.Google Scholar
Somwaru, A. Disaggregated Farm Income by Type of Farm, 1959-1982. National Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report Number 558. Washington D.C. 1986.Google Scholar
Spriggs, J. “Economic Analysis of the Western Grain Stabilization Program.” Canadian J. Agr. Econ., 33(March 1985):209–229.Google Scholar
USDA, ASCS. ASCS Commodity Fact Sheet, 1987-88 DAIRY PRICE SUPPORT PROGRAM. April 1988a.Google Scholar
USDA, ASCS. ASCS Commodity Fact Sheet, FLUE-CURED TOBACCO. April 1988b.Google Scholar
Working, E.J. and Norton, L.J.. “Supporting Farm Income.” Illinois Farm Economics, (April and May 1946):345–351.Google Scholar