Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2009
Two hypotheses are available for the origin of the Zimbabwe culture. A religious hypothesis attributes its development to an African society in isolation, placing it in the class of a primary state. In contrast, the trade hypothesis maintains that it was a secondary state resulting from the gold trade.
If the religious hypothesis is correct, then Zimbabwe would be an exception to all other known cases of primary state formation. The archaeological evidence points to a horticultural subsistence throughout the Iron Age sequence in the area and a small population until Period III/IV. On the other hand, all known primary states were based on large populations and intensive agriculture. It is more likely that Zimbabwe is a typical case of secondary state formation.
The stratigraphy on the Acropolis indicates that a social transition from Period II to III probably occurred at Zimbabwe and was not the result of an immigrant group, and the short chronology places this transition around A.D. 1250. The evidence available from Arab documents, trade imports and ancient mining demonstrates that trade existed well before then. Consequently, the evolution of the Zimbabwe culture was almost certainly due to the Arab gold trade.
1 Randall-MacIver, D., Mediaeval Rhodesia (London: MacMillan and Co., 1906), 85.Google Scholar
2 Abraham, D. P., ‘The early political history of the Kingdom of Mwena Mutapa (850–1589)’, in Historians in Tropical Africa, Proceedings of the Leverhulme Inter-Collegiate History Conference (Salisbury, 1962), 61–92.Google ScholarFagan, B. M., Southern Africa during the Iron Age (London: Thames and Hudson, 1965), 120–1.Google Scholar
3 Caton-Thompson, G., The Zimbabwe Culture, Ruins and Reactions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1931), 196–9.Google ScholarJaffey, A. J. E., ‘A reappraisal of the history of the Rhodesian Iron Age up to the fifteenth century’, J. Afr. Hist. VII, 2 (1966), 193–4.Google ScholarSummers, R., ‘Ancient Mining in Rhodesia’, Natn. Mus. Rhod. Mem. 3 (1969), 218.Google Scholar
4 Caton-Thompson, , Zimbabwe Culture, 69–85.Google Scholar
5 K. R. Robinson, ‘Excavations on the Acropolis Hill’, in Summers, R., Robinson, K. R. and Whitty, A., ‘Zimbabwe excavations; 195,’ Occ. Papers Natn. Mus. Sth Rhod. III, 3A (1961), 159–92.Google Scholar
6 Randall-MacIver, Mediaeval Rhodesia; Caton-Thompson, , Zimbabwe Culture; Summers, et. al., ‘Zimbabwe excavations’ op cit.Google Scholar
7 Summers, ibid, 326–30.
8 Garlake, P. S., ‘The value of imported ceramics in the dating and interpretation of the Rhodesian Iron Age,’ J. Afr. Hist. IX, I (1968), 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 E.g. Summers, , Ancient Mining, 126.Google Scholar Although a sixteenth century date is accepted for the end of the sequence, separate classes and periods are kept. In ‘Forty years progress in Iron Age studies in Rhodesia, 1929–69,’ S. Afr. archaeol. Bull. xxv (1970), 95–103, Garlake's work is entirely omitted.Google Scholar
10 Garlake, P. S., ‘Rhodesian ruins–a preliminary assessment of their styles and chronology,’ J. Afr. Hist. XI, 4 (1970), 508.Google Scholar
11 Abraham, D. P., ‘The early political history of the kingdom of Mwene Mutapa,’ 67.Google Scholar
12 Mary Aquina, Sr., O.P. (Weinrich, Dr. A. K. H.), ‘The Tribes in Victoria Reserve,’ NADA,IX, 2 (1965), 8.Google Scholar
13 The Journals of Carl Mauch, 1869–1872, Burke, E. E. (ed.) (Salisbury, 1969), 215–18.Google Scholar
14 Aquina, , ‘Tribes in Victoria Reserve,’ 8–9.Google Scholar
15 Read, M., The Ngoni of Nyasaland (London), 8–9.Google Scholar
16 von Sicard, H., ‘The Durnbuseya,’ NADA, IX, 5 (1968), 22–3,Google Scholar describes this, but wrongly assumes Zwangendaba to be the ‘Swazi’ leader. A much more accurate account by W. M.Thomas in 1906 (National Archives of Rhodesia, A 3/18/28, N. C. Insize to C.N.C. Bulawayo, 16 May 1906) identified ‘Masesenyana’, who was in turn identified as Ngwana Maseko by Liesegang, G. J., ‘Nguni migration between Delagoa Bay and the Zambezi, 1821–1839,’ African Historical Studies, III, 2 (1970), 319.Google Scholar
17 Mauch, 186. This information regarding oral tradition has been supplied by D. N. Beach.Google Scholar
18 Summers, , Ancient Mining, 126.Google Scholar
19 Huffman, T. N., ‘Excavations at Leopard's Kopje Main Kraal: A preliminary report,’ S. Afr. Archaeol. Bull. XXVI (1971), 495–513.Google Scholar
20 Y-135−17, A.D. 1050±65 (Bambandyanalo) and SR-134, A.D. 1090±95 (Mawala Hill).
21 Garlake, , ‘Rhodesian ruins,’ 504.Google Scholar
22 M-914, AM. 1085±150, Robinson, , op. cit. 191.Google Scholar
23 Garlake, P. S., ‘New Rhodesian Iron Age radiocarbon dates,’ Rhodesian Prehistory, III (1969), 8.Google Scholar
24 Summers, , op. cit. 126.Google Scholar
25 Garlake, P. S., ‘Test excavations at Mapela Hill, near the Shashi River, Rhodesia,’ Arnoldia, Rhod. III, 34 (1968), 1–29.Google Scholar
26 Summers, , Ancient Mining, 524–8;Google ScholarPhillipson, D. W. and Fagan, B. M. ‘The date of the Ingombe Ilede burials,’ J. Afr. Hist. X, 2 (1969), 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Abraham, , ‘History of Mwene Mutapa,’ 61–2.Google Scholar
28 Garlake, , ‘Rhodesian ruins,’ 507. All of the Later Iron Age ceramic traditions share many attributes, and it is possible that they had a common ancestor. But it is a complete misunderstanding of ceramic typology to consider Zimbabwe Class 2 as part of the Leopard's Kopje tradition or to have derived from it.Google Scholar
29 Webb, M. C., ‘Carneiro's hypothesis of limited land resources and the origins of the state; a Latin Amerianist's approach to an old problem,’ S East. Latin Amst. XII, 3 (1968), 1–8.Google Scholar
30 Carneiro, R. L., ‘Slash-and-burn cultivation among the Kuikuru and its implications for cultural developments in the Amazon basin,’ in Cohen, Y. A. (ed.), Man in Adaptation: The Cultural Present (Chicago: Aldine, 1968), 131–45.Google ScholarWebb, , ‘Carneiro's hypothesis’.Google Scholar
31 ‘Description of the situations, customs and produce of some places of Africa (c. 1518),’ in Documents on the Portuguese in Mozambique and Central Africa (Lisbon: National Archives of Rhodesia and Centro de Estudos Historicos Ultramarinos, 1966), v, 373–81. ‘Notes made by Gasper Veloso, clerk of the factory of Mozambique and to the King (c. 1512)’, in Documents, III (1964), 181–9.Google Scholar
32 Freeman-Grenville, G. S. P., The East African Coast–select documents from the first to the early 19th century (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962), 14–17.Google Scholar
33 Burke, E. E., ‘Some aspects of Arab contact with Southern Africa,’ in Historians in Tropical Africa (1962), 93–166.Google Scholar
34 Freeman-Grenville, , ‘Select documents,’ 23–4.Google ScholarBurke, , ‘Arab contact,’ 101.Google Scholar
35 Kindly identified by N. Chittick.
36 Freeman-Grenville, , op. cit. 31.Google Scholar
37 Chittick, N., ‘A new look at the history of Pate,’ J. Aft. Hist. x, 3 (1969), 375–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar‘Discoveries in the Lamu Archipelago,’ Azania. III (1969). 37–67.Google Scholar
38 Summers, , Ancient Mining, 197–8.Google Scholar
39 Huffman, T. N., ‘Cloth from the Iron Age in Rhodesia,’ Arnoldia, Rhod. v, 14 (1971), 15.Google Scholar
40 Robinson, , ‘Excavations on the Acropolis’.Google Scholar
41 Schofield, J. F., ‘Southern African beads and their relation to the beads of Inyanga’, in Summers, R., Inyanga; Prehistoric Settlement in Southern Rhodesia (Cambridge: University Press, 1959), Appendix 10, 180–229.Google Scholar
42 Huffman, T. N., unpublished field notes.Google Scholar
43 Robinson, K. R., ‘Archaeology of the Rozvi,’ in Stokes, E. and Brown, R. (eds), The Zambesian Past: Studies in Central African History (Manchester: University Press, 1966), 3–27.Google Scholar
44 Fouché, L., Mapungubwe, ancient Bantu civilization on the Limpopo (Cambridge: University Press, 1937);Google ScholarGardner, G. A., Mapungubwe, Vol. 2 (Pretoria: Van Schaik, 1963).Google Scholar
45 Fagan, B. M., Iron Age cultures in Zambia, Vol. I (London: Chatto & Windus, 1967).Google Scholar
46 Summers, , Ancient Mining, 184–94.Google Scholar
47 Ibid. 119.
48 Phillipson, D. W. and Fagan, B. M., ‘The date of the Ingombe Ilede burials,’ 199–204.Google Scholar
49 Summers, , op. cit. 134.Google Scholar
50 Gluckman, M., ‘Economy of the Central Barotze plain’, Rhodes Livingstone Papers No.7;Google ScholarSmith, A., ‘The trade of Delagoa Bay as a factor in Nguni politics, 1750–1835,’ in Thompson, L. (ed.) African Societies in Southern Africa (New York: Praeger, 1969), 171–89.Google Scholar
51 Webb, , ‘Carneiro's hypothesis’.Google Scholar
52 E.g. Leopard's Kopje. Robinson, K. R., ‘The Leopard's Kopje culture its position in the Iron Age of Southern Rhodesia,’ S. Aft. Arthaeol. Bull. XXI, 81 (1966), 26.Google Scholar
53 Garlake, , ‘Rhodesian ruins,’ 507–8.Google Scholar
54 Ibid. 507.
55 Abraham, , ‘History of the Mwene Mutapa,’ 62.Google Scholar
56 Ibid. 62.
57 Abraham, D. P., ‘The Monomotapa dynasty,’ NADA, XXXVI (1959), 59–84.Google Scholar
58 Previous drafts of this paper have benefited by comments from Dr D. N. Beach, Mr G. Bell-Cross, Mr C. K. Cooke, Miss P. Hobley, Mr M. A. Raath, and Mrs R. White.