Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:34:24.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Passages in the Life of a White Anthropologist: Max Gluckman in Northern Rhodesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Richard Brown
Richard Brown
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The period following the world slump saw increased British official interest in applying the new science of social anthropology to colonial problems. This paper looks at the eight years (1939–47) during which the distinguished South African anthropologist, Max Gluckman, held the post of Assistant Anthropologist and later Director at the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute, Northern Rhodesia, and carried out field research among the Lozi of Barotseland. His post was also referred to as one in ‘functional’ or ‘applied’ anthropology, and the R.L.I, as a whole was intended to contribute to the solution of the urgent social problems thrown up by the growth of the mining industry. It is suggested that Gluckman's own shift in outlook from a belief in academic aloofness to a concern for active involvement with the administration, as well as being part of a wider change in attitudes, was also linked to his personal situation and to the unifying effects of the Second World War within N. Rhodesia. Gluckman was able to gain support for the ambitious research programme which was to put N. Rhodesia in the forefront of the post-war policy of organizing social research through local institutes, but his attempt to engage directly in practical affairs in N. Rhodesia proved disillusioning. Although the N. Rhodesian government continued to support the Institute and in theory welcomed Gluckman's offers of co-operation, it is shown that in practice little came of his attempts to apply either his specific knowledge of the Lozi or his general theoretical knowledge to administrative problems. Any influence he may have exerted on the colonial evolution of N. Rhodesia therefore remained indirect, but his position was one in harmony with the underlying trends towards decolonization.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , October 1979 , pp. 525 - 541
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Elizabeth Colson has reviewed the work of her immediate predecessor as Director of the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute in the special anniversary issue of African Social Research, 24 (Dec. 1977)Google Scholar. The memoir ‘Max Gluckman’ by Firth, Raymond, Proceedings of the British Academy, lxi (1975), 478–96Google Scholar, is a most valuable assessment. Full details of Gluckman's career and publications are available in Freedom and Constraint: A Memorial Tribute to Max Gluckman, ed. Aronoff, Myron J. (Assen/Amsterdam, 1976), 165–79.Google Scholar

2 Gluckman, M., Order and Rebellion in Tribal Africa (London, 1963), viii.Google Scholar

3 Coquery-Vidrovitch, C., ‘La mise en dépendance de l'Afrique noire: structures économiques et organisation sociale, 1800–1970’, Cahiers d'Etudes africaines, 61–2 (1976), 39.Google Scholar

4 Lee, J. M., Colonial Development and Good Government (Oxford, 1967), 41–5.Google Scholar

5 Pocock, D., Understanding Social Anthropology (London, 1975), 4.Google Scholar

6 Hailey, to Young, Hubert Sir, 17 June 1937Google Scholar, PRO/CO 795/88/45043.

7 Brett, E. A., Colonialism and Underdevelopment in East Africa (London, 1973), 53.Google Scholar

8 The Times, 30 06 1937Google Scholar (Institute Appeal). For further information on the foundation and early years of the Institute see Brown, R., ‘Anthropology and Colonial Rule: Godfrey Wilson and the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute’, Asad, T. (ed.), Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter (London, 1973), 173–97.Google Scholar

9 Dutton, E. A. T., Deputy to the Governor, to Secretary of State, 14 04 1938Google Scholar, PRO/CO 795/96/45043/1. See also J. C. Trevor to Secretary of State, 13 July 1938, Ibid., and Board of Trustees: minutes of meetings held 25 Nov. 1937, 16 March 1938, 29 June 1938, IAS. The settler members of the Legislative Council informed Lord Passfield that ‘British colonists…hold that the British Empire is primarily concerned with the furtherance of the interests of British subjects of British race and only thereafter with other British subjects, protected races, and the nationals of other countries, in that order’ (Correspondence with regard to Native Policy in Northern Rhodesia, Cmd. 3731 (1930), 4–5).Google Scholar

10 The details of the appointment have been pieced together from Wilson, to Lane-Poole, E. H. (Provincial Commissioner, Livingstone, and a Trustee), 27 Sept. 1938Google Scholar, ZNA/B1/4/MISC/6/3; Wilson, to Maybin, J. A. (Governor of N. Rhodesia and President of the Board of Trustees), c.c., 10 Jan. 1939Google Scholar, IAS/A16; Maybin, to Robins, T. Ellis (Trustee), c.c., 25 Feb. 1939Google Scholar, IAS/A11/A29; Wilson, ‘Appointment of Assistant Anthropologist’, n.d. (? 06 1939Google Scholar), IAS/129; Wilson, to Gluckman, , 18 03 1940Google Scholar, c.c., IAS/A25/A26; minutes, 11 March 1939, 28 June 1939, IAS.

11 Wilson, to Gluckman, , 18 03 1940Google Scholar, c.c., IAS/A25/A26. Roy Welensky had encountered the anti-semitism then prevalent in Northern Rhodesian white society: Taylor, Don, The Rhodesian (London, 1955), 34–5.Google Scholar

12 See below, note 19; also private information.

13 Gluckman, to Wilson, , 7 Sept. 1939Google Scholar, 3 and 25 Oct. 1939, Wilson, to Gluckman, , 19 Sept. 1939Google Scholar, c.c., Acting Financial Secretary of Rhodesia, N. to Clark, J. Desmond, 7 Nov. 1939Google Scholar, IAS/A2C.

14 Braatvedt, E. N., n.d.; testimonials also from Radcliffe-Brown, 22 May 1939Google Scholar, and Evans-Pritchard, , 18 05 1939Google Scholar, IAS/A2C. Firth, ‘Gluckman’, assesses the influences of Gluckman's teachers and colleagues on his theoretical outlook.

15 Wilson, to Gluckman, , 5 May 1939Google Scholar, and reply, 24 July, IAS/A2C. Gluckman believed that it was only with the publication of African Political Systems that the science of political anthropology was established when a new generation tackled problems ‘overlooked’ (sic) by earlier anthropologists (Gluckman, , Order & Rebellion, 4Google Scholar), but this seems an over-simple view of the development of new problems in a field of knowledge.

16 Report of the Commission to Enquire into the Financial and Economic Position of Northern Rhodesia, Colonial no. 145 (London, 1938), 192Google Scholar. See also Caplan, G. L., The Elites of Barotseland (London, 1970Google Scholar) for much valuable information on Barotseland in this period.

17 Secretary-Curator to Financial Secretary, 8 Jan. 1940Google Scholar, c.c., IAS/A2C; Livingstone Mail, 13 and 20 Jan. 1940.Google Scholar

18 Chicken, R. T. (Governor's Private Secretary) to Wilson, , confidential, 16 07 1940Google Scholar, ZNA/B1/4/MISC/6/1; Maybin, J. A. to Boyd, E. B. (Assistant Secretary, Colonial Office), 14 Feb. 1941Google Scholar, PRO/CO 795/121/45043. See also Gluckman, to Fox-Pitt 17 Jan. 1947Google Scholar, c.c., IAS/148y.

19 Wilson, , ‘Confidential report on Dr Max Gluckman. For His Excellency’, 18 07 1940Google Scholar, ZNA/B1/4/MISC/6/1.

20 Wilson, to Governor, 27 Aug. and 1 Oct. 1940Google Scholar, c.c.'s, ZNA/B1/4/MISC/6/2.

21 Confidential minutes of a special meeting of the Trustees, 27 Nov. 1940Google Scholar, ZNA/B1/4/MISC/6/3. These were retained in the Secretariat and are not found in the IAS minute book. Fuller details are given in Brown, , ‘Anthropology and Colonial rule’, 187–92.Google Scholar

22 Richards, A. I. to Maybin, J. A., 3 Jan. 1941Google Scholar, ZNA/B1/4/MISC/6/1.

23 Minutes, 7 Jan. 1943Google Scholar, IAS.

24 Minute of 18 Feb. 1941Google Scholar, ZNA/B1/4/MISC/6/1.

25 Hailey's views are reported by Moyne, Lord to Elton, Lord in draft, 5 05 1941Google Scholar, PRO/CO 795/121/45043.

26 Man, v (Jan.–Feb. 1944Google Scholar), 15. See also his An African Survey (London, 1938), 40 ff.Google Scholar

27 Gluckman, to Captain Martin Morris, 22 Oct. 1943Google Scholar, c.c., IAS/146/11.

28 Werskey, G., The Visible College: A Collective Biography of British Scientists and Socialists of the 19305 (London, 1978), 236Google Scholar. This study contains much information about the Association of Scientific Workers, and also charts the rise and decline of ideas about the social responsibility of science in Britain in the 1930s and 1940s.

29 Minute by Carstairs, C. Y., 17 Sept. 1946Google Scholar, PRO/CO 927/1/280001.

30 Hinden's, Plan for Africa (London, 1941Google Scholar), a report prepared for the Colonial Bureau of the Fabian Society, is largely based on material about Northern Rhodesia, and illustrates many of the ideas about development current at the time.

31 ‘E. H. Carr's Russia’, Guardian, 25 Nov. 1978Google Scholar. Bertram, A., in The House, A Machine for Living In: A Summary of the Art and Science of Homemaking Considered Functionally (1935Google Scholar), saw planning and the functional all-purpose room as ‘an expression of man's present economic and social efforts: it is in sympathy with Communism, the Fascist corporate state, the Milk Marketing Board, the London Passenger Transport Board, the planned capitalism of P.E.P., the railway timetable'. (Quoted by Burnet, J., A Social History of Housing (Newton Abbot, 1978), 259.Google Scholar) Functionalism was by no means restricted to anthropologists!

32 Wilson, , ‘Minute’ and ‘Draft of Proposals’, 3 03 1940Google Scholar, ZNA/B1/4/MISC/6/1.

33 Minutes, 2 June 1940, 8 April 1942, IAS; Waddington, E. J. to Beckett, H., c.c., 18 Feb. 1942Google Scholar, ZNA/B1/4/MISC/6/1; Richards, A. I. to Gluckman, , 1 Sept. 1943Google Scholar, IAS/142.

34 Minutes, 7 Jan. 1943Google Scholar, IAS.

35 Gluckman, to Richards, A. I., 30 Nov. 1944Google Scholar, c.c., IAS/182/A381. Characteristically he added, ‘;Personally I think it pretty good.’

36 ‘Minute to the Trustees…’, 8 Nov. 1941Google Scholar, ZNA/B1/4/MISC/6/1.

37 Minutes, 2 July 1943, where it is recorded that the document had been sent to Dr Richards when she was Director-elect; ‘She had been impressed with the argument and had asked if she could show it to Lord Hailey…[it was] understood…that Lord Hailey was impressed.' See also her remarks on the importance of the R.L.I, as a model, in African Social Research, 24 (Dec. 1977), 277–8.Google Scholar

38 Minutes, 30 Sept. 1943Google Scholar, IAS.

39 Waddington, to Beit Trust, 20 Nov. 1943Google Scholar, c.c., ZNA/B1/4/MISC/6/3.

40 Gluckman, to Waddington, , 23 Nov. 1943Google Scholar, c.c., IAS/Aia; Gluckman, to Stooke, G. Beresford, 25 Nov. 1943Google Scholar, c.c, IAS/148f.

41 ‘Memorandum on co-operation between government and the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute’, encl. in Gluckman, to Acting Chief Secretary, 19 April 1944Google Scholar, ZNA/SEC/ANT/I.

42 Firth, R., Secretary, CSSRC, to Gluckman, 23 Nov. 1944Google Scholar; Krige, J. D. to Gluckman, , 29 Nov. 1944Google Scholar; Smith, E. W. to Gluckman, , 3 May 1945Google Scholar: IAS/A81/A118; Gluckman, to Schapera, I., 19 Dec. 1944Google Scholar, IAS/146/8a. A version was eventually published as ‘The Seven Year Research Plan of the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute’, Human Problems in British Central Africa, iv (1945), 1–32Google Scholar. The title was reminiscent of the International African Institute's famous ‘Five-Year Plan of Research’, Africa, v (1932).Google Scholar

43 Chief Secretary's circular to Provincial Commissioners and others, 28 Sept. 1944Google Scholar and replies, the minutes of the Provincial Commissioners’ Conference, 1944Google Scholar [Oct.], and further correspondence: ZNA/SEC/ANT/4.

44 To Chief Secretary, 24 Feb. 1945Google Scholar, ZNA/SEC/ANT/4/28. Ironically Dr Richards had publicly thanked the author of this diatribe for his assistance while he was District Commissioner, Chinsali, in the preface to her classic work on the Bemba, , Land, Labour and Diet (London, 1939).Google Scholar

45 Minutes, 14 Dec. 1944Google Scholar, IAS; Gluckman, to CSSRC, 8 August 1946Google Scholar, IAS/173.

46 Brown, , ‘Anthropology and Colonial Rule’, 190–2.Google Scholar

47 Gluckman, to Krige, J. D., 22 Dec. 1944Google Scholar, c.c., IAS/149/A145.

48 Gluckman, , ‘Visit to Barotse at Rand Mines’, mimeo. 1943Google Scholar, 2. IAS/unnumbered file.

49 Gluckman, to CSSRC, 8 Aug. 1946Google Scholar, IAS/173.

50 Report of the Commission to Enquire into the Financial and Economic Position of Northern Rhodesia (Pim-Milligan), Colonial No. 145 (1938), 191–7, 343Google Scholar; Labour Conditions in Northern Rhodesia (Orde Browne), Colonial No. 150 (1938), 42–44, 54Google Scholar; Report of the Rhodesia-Nyasaland Royal Commission (Bledisloe), Cmd. 5949 (1939), 235–6.Google Scholar

51 Originally dated 16 Dec. 1943Google Scholar, but later published with amendments as No. 1 in R.L.I. Communications (1945).Google Scholar

52 Administrative Organization, ii.Google Scholar

53 Gluckman, to Vaux, H., 23 Dec. 1943Google Scholar, c.c., and G. Read, 9 Jan. 1944, c.c., IAS/148; Gluckman, to Ritchie, J. F., n.d., [?15 Feb. 1944Google Scholar ], 6 March 1944, c.c.; Ritchie, to Gluckman, , 22 Feb. 1944Google Scholar, IAS/146/8.

54 Gluckman, to Ritchie, , 6 March 1944Google Scholar, c.c., IAS/146/8.

55 Chief Secretary to Read, J. G., 20 March 1945Google Scholar and reply, ZNA/SEC/NAT/257/41 and 43.

56 Gluckman, to Rushbridger, G. H., 7 June 1944Google Scholar, c.c., IAS/148n.

57 Minutes of District Commissioners’ Conference, Mongu, Nov. 1945Google Scholar, ZNA/SEC/NAT/257/56. It recommended that changes should be drastic.

58 Based on confidential memoranda by successive Provincial Commissioners, Watmore, H. A. (2 March 1945Google Scholar) and Glennie, A. F. B. (27 Feb. 1946Google Scholar), and by the Secretary of Native Affairs, Hudson, R. H. (1 April 1946Google Scholar). The words quoted are those of Glennie.

59 Economy, 120–1.Google Scholar

60 As Gluckman put it to the Lozi: ‘a healthy nation changes its customs continually as times change; this not to destroy the past, but to recreate it’, Administrative Organization, II.

61 ‘The taming of a young Turk: fieldwork in Nigeria, W.’, Anthropological Forum IV, 2 (1977), 218.Google Scholar

62 Firth, , ‘Gluckman’, 482.Google Scholar

63 Barnes, J. A. to Mitchell, J. C., 21 June 1947Google Scholar (privately held).

64 See especially Fox-Pitt, to Gluckman, , 23 Nov., 14 Dec. 1946Google Scholar, 24 March 1947, and copies of Gluckman, to Fox-Pitt, 28 Nov., 9 and 16 Dec. 1946Google Scholar, 27 March 1947, IAS/148y.

65 This arose from the Secretariat’s desire for comments on a memorandum by the administrative officer, Brelsford, W. V., on ‘The Succession of Bemba Chiefs’, later published (Lusaka, 1944Google Scholar). However, the comments from Audrey Richards and Gluckman were so contradictory as to cancel each other out. See Gluckman to Secretary for Native Affairs, 21 Feb., and to Waddington, 24 Feb., Richards, to Waddington, , 7 April 1944Google Scholar: ZNA/B1/4/MISC/6/1. Gluckman, later worked up his analysis and published it as ‘Succession and Civil War Among the Bemba’, Human Problems in British Central Africa, xvi (1954)Google Scholar. Like the Lozi, the Bemba were, of course, a major administrative headache. Gluckman believed he had ‘worked out the political basis of Bemba society’ on a ‘bare minimum of data’ and one essay by Richards: Gluckman, to Ritchie, J. F., 6 March 1944Google Scholar, IAS/146/8.

66 Rotberg, R. I., Black Heart: Gore-Browne and the Politics of Multiracial Zambia (Berkeley, 1977), 162Google Scholar, 180–2, 237–40.

67 Gore-Browne, to Gluckman, , 23 Oct. 1943Google Scholar and 6 Jan. 1944, Gluckman, to Gore-Browne, , c.c., 27 Oct. 1943: IAS/148g.Google Scholar

68 Gluckman, to Gore-Browne, , 9 Jan. 1944Google Scholar, c.c., IAS/148g.

69 Gluckman, to Gore-Browne, , 20 Dec. 1943Google Scholar, IAS/148g.

70 Draft minutes and correspondence concerning meeting of the Land Tenure Committee, 5 Dec. 1944Google Scholar; Minutes of second meeting, 16 May 1945Google Scholar, IAS/192/A94. See also minutes, 14 Dec. 1944, IAS.

71 Especially 31 May and 5 July 1945Google Scholar, c.c., IAS/192/A94.

72 Gluckman, to Schapera, I., c.c., 3 July and 3 August 1945Google Scholar, Schapera, to Gluckman, , 19 July 1945Google Scholar, IAS/146/8a; Gluckman, to Firth, R., Secretary CSSRC, c.c., 26 Sept. 1945Google Scholar, IAS/192/A94.

73 Throughout the controversy, Gluckman compared his successful cooperation with government technical officers on the Tonga land tenure survey with the impossibility of working with administrative officers and politicians in the Legislative Council.

74 Gluckman, to Allan, William, c.c., n.d. [Nov. 1945Google Scholar ], IAS/192/A94.

75 ‘The Institute Under Max Gluckman’, African Social Research, 24 (Dec. 1977), 293.Google Scholar

76 Human Problems in British Central Africa, vi (1948), 79.Google Scholar

77 This is noted by Robertson, A. F., ‘Anthropology and Government in Ghana’, African Affairs, lxxiv (1975), 51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar, who cites especially the influence of Evans-Pritchard's condemnation of applied anthropology in Africa, xvi (1946), 92–99Google Scholar. Chilver, Sally, ‘The secretaryship of the Colonial Social Science Council’, Anthropological Forum, iv (1977), 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar, observes, ‘by 1949 the impracticable notion that anthropologists themselves should act as advisers to colonial governments was waning’. The formation of the Association of Social Anthropologists in 1946 with strict entry qualifications was another sign of the new atmosphere; see Kuper, A., Anthropologists and Anthropology (London, 1973), chapter 5Google Scholar. A visit on leave to England in 1946 made Gluckman modify his enthusiasm for local institutes; see ‘Director's Report to Trustees on Visit to Cape and England’ [1946], 3, Agenda, for 2 Dec. 1946Google Scholar, Annexure C, IAS/Alb(2)/A.80a.

78 Werskey, , Visible College, ch. 8Google Scholar. Swanzy, H. to Gluckman, , 30 Oct. 1945Google Scholar, 25 Nov. 1946, IAS/112.

79 See letters to the Times Literary Supplement, 3 Aug. 1973Google Scholar, and the New York Review of Books, 28 Nov. 1974Google Scholar. Also relevant is his ‘Anthropology and Apartheid’ in Fortes, M. and Patterson, S. (eds.), Studies in Applied Anthropology (London, 1975).Google Scholar

80 Letter to New York Review of Books, 28 Nov. 1974.Google Scholar

81 Survey, 50.Google Scholar

82 By the end of the war, in addition to the large grant awarded from C.D. & W. funds for the Research Plan, the Institute received financial support from the six British territories in Central and East Africa, the British South Africa Company, the Rhodes and Beit Trusts, and all the major mining companies operating in Northern Rhodesia.

83 Coquery-Vidrovitch, , ‘La mise en dépendence’, 38–9.Google Scholar

84 ‘Economic anthropology or political economy; the Barotse social formation’, Clammer, John, ed., The New Economic Anthropology (London, 1977).Google Scholar

85 ‘Gluckman, Max’ (as cited in note 1, above), 493.Google Scholar

86 Gluckman related many of his theoretical interests to the southern African situation in two late papers, ‘The tribal area in South and Central Africa’, in Kuper, L. and Smith, M. G. (eds), Pluralism in Africa (Berkeley, 1971Google Scholar), and ‘Tribalism, ruralism and urbanism in plural societies’, in Gann, L. H. and Duignan, P. (eds), Colonialism in Africa, iii (Cambridge, 1971).Google Scholar