Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7pht Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:11:58.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Moroccan Nationalist Movement: Istiqlal, the Sultan, and the Country*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

E. G. H. Joffé
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The conventional view of the Moroccan nationalist movement argues that its success was rooted in the experience of the Second World War in Morocco. However, this overlooks the critical differentiation in popular response to nationalist ideas that developed over the period from 1926 to independence in 1956. Whereas the pre-war nationalist movement was urban-based, with a strong middle-class and Salafiyyist tradition behind it, and picked up support from other urban groups that suffered from the Great Depression in the 1930s, it consistently lacked the essential concomitant of a broad rural base. This was in part due to the effective control of rural areas maintained by the French administration, but also arose from the development of a new élite in rural areas that had a clear interest in acquisition and control of land. Although this group had antecedents that originated from pre-colonial times, it was the conditions of the Protectorate and the development of a money-based economy which allowed it to flourish while other aspects of indigenous economic activity declined. This group, which may be considered to constitute a ‘kulak’ class, thus had an evident interest in supporting the French Protectorate authorities, and little concern for nationalist aspirations, particularly since it was also closely associated with the French administration of rural areas through its role in the caïdat. It was only when this élite found its economic interests threatened, and realized that the nationalist movement had the support of the Sultan, that its political concerns were redirected. This change occurred in 1947 with the Tangier speech, in which Mohammed V implicitly rejected French tutelage and, by inference, turned to the nationalist movement to support his dynasty. The speech coincided with the end of the consequences of the 1945 famine, which gave the nationalist movement its opportunity to extend its network into rural areas. It was this development, rather than the Second World War itself, that ensured the ultimate success of the Moroccan nationalist movement.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , October 1985 , pp. 289 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Brignon, J. and others, Histoire du Maroc (Casablanca, 1968), 396.Google Scholar

2 Halstead, J. P., Rebirth of a Nation. The origins and rise of Moroccan nationalism, 1912–1944 (Harvard, 1969), 261.Google Scholar

3 Blair, L. P., Western Window in the Arab World (Austin, Texas, 1970), 96.Google Scholar

4 Knapp, W., North West Africa: A Political and Economic Survey (Oxford, 1977), 277.Google Scholar

5 Halstead, , Rebirth of a Nation, 255.Google Scholar

6 Cf. the ‘deep freeze’ referred to by Hart, D. M., ‘The tribe in modern Morocco: two case studies’, in Gellner, E. and Micaud, C. (eds), Arabs and Berbers (London, 1972), 25–58, p. 39.Google Scholar

7 Cf. Duclos, J.-L., ‘The Berbers and the rise of Moroccan nationalism’Google Scholar, ibid., 217–229, p. 225.

8 Information from interviews by the author in the Ouezzane (Wazzan) region, 1977.

9 Under the terms of the Treaty of Fes, 1912, which established the French Protectorate, France was supposed to direct the native state and aid it in modernisation and development. In reality, French rule became more and more direct, until in the 1950s General Juin proposed the principle of co-sovereignty of France with the Sultan. Cf. Julien, Ch.-A., Le Maroc face aux impérialismes, 1415–1956 (Paris, 1978), 12, 350.Google Scholar

10 Halstead, , Rebirth of a Nation, 166Google Scholar; Abun-Nasr, J. M., A History of the Maghrib, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, 1975), 368.Google Scholar

11 Cf. Halstead, , Rebirth of a Nation, 119–126Google Scholar; Eickelman, D. F., The Middle East: An Anthropological Approach (New York, 1981), 247.Google Scholar

12 lit. ‘Treasury’, the central government of the Sultan in pre-colonial and colonial Morocco.

13 Cf. Laroui, A., Les origines sociales et culturelles du nationalisme marocain (1830–1912) (Paris, 1977).Google Scholar

14 Cf. Halstead, , Rebirth of a Nation, 33.Google Scholar

15 Cf. M. V. Frunze, ‘Evropeiskie Tsivilizatov'i i Marokko’, idem, Collected Works, Vol. 2 (Moscow, 1957); Pennell, C. R., ‘A critical investigation of the opposition of the Rifi confederation led by Muhammad bin ‘Abd al-Karim al-Khattabi to Spanish colonial expansion, 1920–1926, and its political and social background’ (Ph.D thesis, Leeds, 1979).Google Scholar

16 Author's interviews, Ouezzane region, 1977.

17 Cf. Ranger, T. O., ‘Connections between “primary resistance” movements and modern mass nationalism in East and Central Africa’, part I, J. Afr. Hist., IX (1968), 437–453, at p. 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Cf. Hourani, A., Arabic Thought in the Liberal Age (Oxford, 1962; Cambridge, 1983), Chs V, VI, IX, and 371–372.Google Scholar

19 Cf. Halstead, , Rebirth of a Nation, 145–150Google Scholar; for the Etoile, cf. Kaddache, M., Histoire du nationalisme algérien; question nationale et politique algérienne, 1919–1951, Vol. I (Algiers, 1980), 182–204.Google Scholar

20 Cf. Laroui, A., La crise des intellectuels arabes; traditionnalisme ou historicisme? (Paris, 1974), 51Google Scholar, with his use of the term ‘refus’.

21 Berque, J., French North Africa: The Maghrib Between Two World Wars (London, 1967), 215.Google Scholar

22 Cf. Burke, Edmund III, ‘The image of the Moroccan state in French ethnographical literature: a new look at the origins of Lyautey's Berber policy’, in Gellner, and Micaud, , Arabs and Berbers, 175–199.Google Scholar

23 Cf. e.g. G. Ayache, ‘La fonction d'arbitrage du Makhzen’, in idem., Etudes d'histoire marocaine (Rabat, 1979), 158–176.

24 Cf. Knapp, , North West Africa, 274Google Scholar; Brown, K., ‘The impact of the Dahir Berbère in Salé’, in Gellner, and Micaud, , Arabs and Berbers, 201–215Google Scholar; Halstead, , Rebirth of a Nation, Ch. X, 178–190.Google Scholar

25 Given in Halstead, , Rebirth of a Nation, Appendix A.Google Scholar

26 Cf. Brignon, , Histoire du Maroc, 393Google Scholar; Knapp, , North West Africa, 275Google Scholar; Halstead, , Rebirth of a Nation, 191–201.Google Scholar

27 Cf. Berque, , French North Africa, 104–107, 259–261Google Scholar; Eickelman, D. F., Moroccan Islam (Austin, Texas, 1976), 213.Google Scholar

28 For the Popular Front, cf. Cobban, A., A History of Modern France (London, 1961), 11, 292.Google Scholar

29 The monthly reports by the Protectorate authorities after 1934 continually emphasize this.

30 Stewart, C. F., The Economy of Morocco, 1912–1962 (Cambridge, Mass., 1974), 142.Google Scholar

31 Halstead, , Rebirth of a Nation, 193.Google Scholar

32 Ibid., 191–201, 252; El-Fassi, Allal, The Independence Movements in North Africa (Washington, D.C., 1954), 170.Google Scholar

33 ‘Bulletin de renseignements des questions musulmanes’, 3 January, 16 February, 1938Google Scholar, Service historique de l'Armée de terre, Vincennes (SHAT), Maroc R.P. 18.

34 ‘Rapports mensuels Fez 1934’, I trimestre, 1934, SHAT, Maroc Fez, 208.

35 Ibid., 2 trimestre, 1934. Interviews, Ouezzane region, 1977.

36 Eickelman, , Moroccan Islam, 229.Google Scholar

37 Geertz, C., Geertz, H. and Rosen, L., Meaning and Order in Moroccan Society (Cambridge, 1979), 15.Google Scholar

38 Bidwell, R., Morocco under Colonial Rule: French Administration of Tribal Areas, 1912–1956 (London, 1973), 57.Google Scholar

39 ‘Situation politique et économique’, 7–13 August 1937, Ministère des Affaires Etrangères, Paris (MAE), NS 490Google Scholar; interviews, Ouezzane region, 1977.

40 Berque, , French North Africa, 232 ff.Google Scholar

41 Stewart, , Economy of Morocco, 77, 78.Google Scholar

42 Ibid., 88–90.

43 Lazerev, G., ‘Aspects du capitalisme agraire au Maroc avant le Protectorat’, Annuaire de l'Afrique du Nord (1975), 74.Google Scholar

44 Ibid., 81; see also Lazarev, , ‘Les concessions foncières au Maroc’, in Khatibi, A. (ed.), Etudes sociologiques sur le Maroc (Rabat, 1971).Google Scholar

45 Blincow, M. J., ‘The rural sociology of a North African village’ (Ph.D. thesis, Manchester, 1977), 85–86.Google Scholar

46 Munson, H., ‘Islam and inequality in Northwest Morocco’ (Ph.D. thesis, Chicago, 1980), 33.Google Scholar Munson argues convincingly that in large parts of the Jbala the term qabīla, usually translated as ‘tribe’, is in fact the vestige of Makhzen administrative divisions and has little to do with common descent.

47 Blincow, , ‘Rural sociology’, 17–18.Google Scholar

48 Munson, , ‘Islam and inequality’, 29–33.Google Scholar

49 A collection was made by the author in the Ouezzane region in 1977.

50 Munson, , ‘Islam and inequality’, 26.Google Scholar

51 Cf. Blincow, , ‘Rural sociology’, 44Google Scholar, and Pennell, , ‘Opposition of the Rifi confederation’.Google Scholar

52 Cf. Biarnay, E., ‘Voleurs, receleurs et complices dans les vallées inférieures du Sebou et de Ouargha’, Archives Berbères, 11, 2 (1917), 135–149.Google Scholar

53 Waterbury, J., North for the Trade: The Life and Times of a Berber Merchant (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London, 1972), 65–69.Google Scholar

54 Leveau, R., Le fellah marocain, défenseur du trône (Paris, 1976), 7, 11–12.Google Scholar

55 Cf. Bidwell, , Morocco Under Colonial Rule, 202–204Google Scholar; Leveau, , Fellah marocain, 11, 241Google Scholar; Charnay, J.-P., La vie musulmane en Algérie d'après la jurisprudence de la première moitié du XXe siècle (Paris, 1965), 122–26Google Scholar; Berque, , French North Africa, 48.Google Scholar

56 Ibid. and Bidwell, , Morocco under Colonial Rule, 212–213.Google Scholar

57 The term is Lazarev's.

58 Brignon, , Histoire du Maroc, 373.Google Scholar The size and composition of this class are both problematic. Stewart, , Economy of Morocco, 81Google Scholar, notes that there are no contemporary statistics, but goes on to suggest (pp. 176–7), that the data available from 1959 onwards reflect the situation under the Protectorate; he ventures no estimate. Brignon's figures are those of Ayache, A., Le Maroc. Bilan d'une colonisation (Paris, 1956), 304–306Google Scholar, tentatively based on land tax returns. More reliable (?) figures from the 1970s quoted by Mesmoudi, T. El, Le crédit agricole et le développement de l'agriculture au Maroc (Rabat, 1982), 86–87Google Scholar, show landholdings of more than 10 hectares as approximately 9 per cent of the number of exploitations, ‘cultivations’, but accounting for 55 per cent of the cultivated area. Ayache's and Brignon's figure of 500,000 to 600,000 persons within this landowning class would give the number of landowners as something more than 100,000, on the basis of 5 persons to each household (El Mesmoudi, loc. cit.); compare this with El Mesmoudi's total of about 168,000 holdings within the relevant categories. For a discussion of the composition of the class, see below, n. 62, 65.

59 Cf. Charnay, , Vie musulmane, 119Google Scholar, and Brett, M., ‘The colonial period in the Maghrib and its aftermath: the present state of historical writing’, J. Afr. Hist., XVII (1976), 291–305, pp. 296–298, 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

60 See n. 58, above.

61 Munson, , ‘Islam and inequality’, 162Google Scholar; the term is used by Waterbury, J., The Commander of the Faithful. The Moroccan Political Elite – A Study in Segmented Politics (London, 1970), 112Google Scholar, quoted by Bidwell, , Morocco under Colonial Rule, 314.Google Scholar

62 For the development of such a rural ‘bourgeoisie’ under the Protectorate, see Waterbury, , Commander of the Faithful, 110–112Google Scholar (quoting Ayache), and Bidwell, , Morocco under Colonial Rule, Ch. XVII, 307–328Google Scholar, passim. The term ‘rural notables’ continues to be commonly used for the whole class. It is nevertheless important to distinguish the majority, of modest means, from the rich minority at the upper end of the range. Ayache, , Le Maroc, 305Google Scholar, quotes an estimate based once again on land tax returns, which distinguishes 7,500 great landowners, ‘grands féodaux’, possessing 1,800,000 hectares, or almost half the area possessed by the class as a whole in 1954. Some redistribution is implied by Mesmoudi, El, Crédit agricole, 86Google Scholar, who gives a figure of roughly 10,000 holdings above 50 hectares in size, accounting for a total of 1,300,000 hectares; within this category are no more than 2,500 holdings above 100 hectares, accounting for 750,000 hectares in all.

63 Berque, J., Etudes d'histoire rurale maghrébine (Tangier and Fes, 1938), 108–110.Google Scholar

64 Charnay, , Vie musulmane, 122–126.Google Scholar

65 Cf. Bidwell, , Morocco under Colonial Rule, 317.Google Scholar The question is complicated by the involvement of the ‘rural notables’ in the district administration, in which the principal Moroccan functionary was the caïd or governor. Ayache, , Le Maroc, 305, n. 4Google Scholar, gives a figure of 3,500 pashas, caïds and shaykhs, all of them great landowners, and further enriched by the profits of office. Waterbury, , Commander of the Faithful, 110–112Google Scholar, and Bidwell, , op. cit., 90–92Google Scholar, show the caïds and their subordinates recruited from the whole class of ‘notables’, and many as relatively poor. Caïds undoubtedly profited from their office, which by the end of the Protectorate tended to run in the family; they were habitually corrupt and frequently unpopular with their subjects: cf. Bidwell, , op. cit., 92–96.Google Scholar Their interest thus lay with the Protectorate, and therefore with the French, to whom they owed their position and their opportunity; in 1953 they almost all took sides against the Sultan: cf. Bidwell, , loc. cit.Google Scholar, and Leveau, , Fellah marocain, 19, 20.Google Scholar The question is the extent to which their attitude was common to the whole class from which they were drawn to form a rural aristocracy.

66 Stewart, , Economy of Morocco, 116–117.Google Scholar

67 Ibid., 134–136.

68 Brignon, , Histoire du Maroc, 391.Google Scholar

69 Ibid., 395; cf. Julien, , Le Maroc, 188.Google Scholar

70 Cf. Abun-Nasr, , History of the Maghrib, 300–302Google Scholar; Parsons, F. V., The Origins of the Morocco Question, 1800–1900 (London, 1976), 516–538.Google Scholar

71 SHAT, Maroc E12 bis. This dossier describes Moroccan agents and German spies in northern Morocco in detail.

72 ‘Bulletins mensuels du Protectorat’, January 1936, March 1937Google Scholar, Archives du Gouvernement-général d'Algérie (AGGA) (Archives d'Outre-Mer, Aix-en-Provence), 27H, 5, 6.

73 Halstead, , Rebirth of a Nation, 256–260.Google Scholar

74 Nevertheless they were enforced:cf. Laskier, M.M., The Alliance Israëlite Universelle and the Jewish Communities of Morocco, 1862–1962 (Albany, N.Y., 1983), 179–183.Google Scholar

75 ‘Rapport mensuel’, 15 September 1941, AGGA, 27H 6.Google Scholar

76 Cf. Blair, , Western Window, 65–66.Google Scholar At the time, the figure given to the House of Commons by Eden was 200: The Times, 10–17 May 1941.Google Scholar

77 ‘Bulletin mensuel’, May 1941, AGGA, 27H 6.Google Scholar

78 Blair, , Western Window, 44Google Scholar; interview, Ouezzane region, 1977. According to the Vichy Protectorate authorities: ‘Les indigènes déjà troublés par les propagandes étrangères adverses, et inquiets de l'aggravation de la situation économique, ont été très sensibles à ce fait nouveau qui a en quelque sorte matérialisé à leurs yeux la défaite de la France que beaucoup n'avaient pas complètement réalisée jusqu'ici’: ‘Bulletin mensuel’, March 1941, AGGA, 27H 6.

79 The final figures were supplied by A. Kahane (personal communication).

80 Cf. Blair, , Western Window, 45.Google Scholar

81 Ibid., Bidwell, , Morocco under Colonial Rule, 174.Google Scholar

82 By the end of the war, 300,000 Moroccans had served in the French armed forces, regular and auxiliary; of these, at least the 100,000 permitted by the Armistice Commission and a further 80,000 reserves were trained before the Allied landings. Cf. Blair, , Western Window, 116.Google Scholar

83 Blair, , Western Window, 97Google Scholar; Knapp, , North West Africa, 277Google Scholar; Julien, , Le Maroc, 189Google Scholar; Nelson, H. D. (ed.), Morocco: a country study (Washington, D.C., 1978), 60Google Scholar; Bernard, S., The Franco-Moroccan Conflict, 1943–1956 (New Haven and London, 1968), 15–16Google Scholar; Alami, M. El, Mohammed V (Rabat, 1981), 69.Google Scholar

84 Cf. Lahbabi, M., Le gouvernement marocain à l'aube du XXe siècle (Rabat, 1968), 23.Google Scholar

85 Blair, , Western Window, 68.Google Scholar

86 Ibid., 67.

87 Cf. Alami, El, Mohammed V, 71.Google Scholar

88 Julien, , Le Maroc, 190–191.Google Scholar

89 ‘…perhaps the greatest disaster that ever attacked the Protectorate’: Bidwell, , Morocco under Colonial Rule, 185.Google Scholar

90 ‘Bulletin mensuel’, March 1941, AGGA, 27H 6.Google Scholar

91 Interviews, Ouezzane region, 1977; cf. Bidwell, , Morocco under Colonial Rule, 184–185.Google Scholar

92 Blair, , Western Window, 49Google Scholar, citing ‘Pertinent data on French Morocco’, 25 October 1942, USAF Archives, file no. 612.610, 7.Google Scholar

93 Mazoyer, H. F., ‘La répercussion de l'économie de guerre du rationnement dans une tribu rurale’, typescript, Centre des Hautes Etudes de l'Administration Musulmane, no. 896 (April 1946).Google Scholar

94 Stewart, , Economy of Morocco, 87.Google Scholar

95 Cf. Mazoyer, , ‘La répercussion’.Google Scholar

96 Cf. Brignon, , Histoire du Maroc, 397–400Google Scholar; Julien, Ch.-A., L'Afrique du Nord en marche, 3rd ed. (Paris, 1972), 299–305.Google Scholar

97 Cf. Julien, , L'Afrique du Nord, 306–308.Google Scholar Jacques Berque and Julien Couleau created a series of modernised farming systems under the title Secteurs de Modernisation du Paysannat (SMP): cf. Stewart, , Economy of Morocco, 109–111Google Scholar; Bidwell, , Morocco under Colonial Rule, 228–232Google Scholar, emphasizing colon hostility and the limited effect of the initiative.

98 Julien, , L'Afrique du Nord, 302–303.Google Scholar

99 Julien, , Le Maroc, 199–201.Google Scholar

100 Julien, , L'Afrique du Nord, 312.Google Scholar

101 This is the principal subject of Julien, , Le Maroc, as it is of Bernard, Franco-Moroccan Conflict.Google Scholar

102 Julien, , Le Maroc, 454–471Google Scholar; Bernard, , Franco-Moroccan Conflict, 318–337.Google Scholar

103 Leveau, , Fellah marocain, 19–25, 241.Google Scholar

104 Ouardighi, A., La grande crise franco-marocaine, 1952–1956 (published by the author, 1976), 147–162Google Scholar, points out that 140 caïds and pachas were destituted in 1957, out of a total of 350. Thus 40 per cent of the caïdat proper, the top level of the provincial administration, was considered to have actively opposed the Sultan and the nationalist cause. The attitude of the remainder varied.

105 Bidwell, , Morocco under Colonial Rule, 311–312Google Scholar; interviews, Ouezzane region, 1977.

106 Cf. Julien, , Le Maroc, 195.Google Scholar

107 Interviews, Ouezzane region, 1977; Julien, , Le Maroc, 361.Google Scholar