Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:20:15.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dispossession and Accumulation in the South African Interior: The Boers and the Tlhaping of Bethulie, 1833–61

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Timothy Keegan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article seeks to illuminate some important themes in nineteenth-century South African history by examining the fate of a small chiefdom of difaqane refugees who settled in 1833 just north of the Orange River under the patronage of a French Protestant missionary. It situates the history of the Tlhaping of Bethulie against the background of the expansion of white settlement north of the Orange River and the development of colonial capitalism in the larger region. The processes of white state formation north of the Orange in the middle years of the century, especially the seminal role of British intervention during the period of the Orange River Sovereignty, are examined. The corresponding rise of white elites and the varied primitive forms of capital accumulation employed by the emerging Boer notables are investigated. The article then seeks to provide a concrete study of these themes in a local setting. These encircling developments provided the context for the rising tensions and conflicts at the Bethulie mission station and in the Tlhaping community in the 1850s. The gradual alienation of the Bethulie lands to private ownership eventually led to the destruction of the territory and the break-up of the community. These processes are examined within the context of the rise of local Boer notables and the nature of state structures in the Orange Free State Republic established in 1854. In the end those who orchestrated and benefited from the dismemberment of the Bethulie territory were those who controlled the instruments of patronage and power in the local Boer state.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , July 1987 , pp. 191 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Thompson, L. M., ‘Co-operation and Conflict: The High Veld’, in Wilson, M. and Thompson, L. M. (eds.), Oxford History of South Africa, I (Oxford, 1969)Google Scholar, republished as A History of South Africa to 1870 (Cape Town, 1982), especially 407–8, 426.Google Scholar

2 Ross, R., Adam Kok's Griquas: A Study in the Development of Stratification in South Africa (Cambridge, 1976), ch. 3;Google ScholarLemue to PEMS, 27 May 1833Google Scholar, Journal des Missions Evangeliques (JME), 1833, 297–303;Google ScholarPellissier to PEMS, 19 November 1833Google Scholar, in Pellissier, S. H., Jean Pierre Pellissier van Bethulie (Pretoria, 1956), 163–6.Google Scholar This biography by the missionary's grandson contains full transcripts in Afrikaans of all extant letters sent by Pellissier to the mission society in Paris.

3 Pellissier to PEMS, 10 June 1834Google Scholar, Pellissier, 200;Google ScholarLauga to PEMS, 10 June 1836Google Scholar, JME, 1836, 340;Google ScholarCameron, J., ‘The Basuto Country’, The Cape of Good Hope and Port Natal Shipping and Mercantile Gazette, 27 12 1844.Google Scholar See also Backhouse, J., A Narrative of a Visit to Mauritius and South Africa (London, 1844), 352–6.Google Scholar

4 Pellissier to PEMS, 20 November 1835, 1 June 1836, 28 January 1837, 20 July 1837, all in Pellissier, 240, 242, 255–6, 268–9, 272;Google Scholar Report of Missionary Conference, 17 April 1855, JME, 1855, 334.Google Scholar

5 Pellissier to PEMS, 29 September 1840Google Scholar, in Pellissier, 308–12;Google Scholar the following in JME, 1840: ‘Station de Bethulie’, 256–8;Google ScholarPellissier to PEMS, 26 March 1840, 321–31; Diary of Gosselin, 331–8; Report of Missionary Conference, 27 April 1840, 364–5.Google Scholar

6 The agreement is to be found in South African Archival Records, Orange Free State, 4 vols. (Cape Town, 1952–1965), IV, 191–2.Google Scholar

7 Report of Missionary Conference, 10 November 1838, JME, 1839, 171–3;Google ScholarPellissier to PEMS, 15 February 1839Google Scholar, in Pellissier, 290–3;Google ScholarRoss, Adam Kok's Griquas, 28;Google ScholarPellissier to PEMS, 23 December 1841Google Scholar, JME, 1842, 281–93.Google Scholar

8 See van der Merwe, P. J., Die Noordwaartse Beweging van die Boere voor die Groot Trek, 1770–1842 (Den Haag, 1937).Google Scholar

9 du Toit, A. and Giliomee, H. (eds), Afrikaner Political Thought: Analysis and Documents, 1. 1780–1850 (Cape Town, 1983), 114–5, 170–71;Google ScholarVan der Merwe, Noordwaartse Beweging, esp. ch. 12;Google Scholarvan Schoor, M. C. E., ‘Die Nasionale en Politieke Bewuswording van die Afrikaner en sy Ontluiking in Transgariep tot 1854’ in Archives Year Book for South African History, 1963, 2 (Cape Town, 1964), ch. 4.Google Scholar

10 Malan, J. H., Die Opkoms van 'n Republiek (Bloemfontein, 1929), chs. 4–6;Google Scholarvan Schoor, M. C. E., ‘Politieke Groeperinge in Transgariep’ in Archives Year Book for South African History, 1950, 2 (Cape Town, 1950), chs. 1–2;Google ScholarGalbraith, J. S., Reluctant Empire: British Policy on the South African Frontier (Berkeley, 1963), chs. 9–10.Google Scholar

11 Galbraith, Reluctant Empire, chs. 10–11;Google Scholarde Kiewiet, C. W., British Colonial Policy and the South African Republics, 1848–1872 (London, 1929);Google ScholarAtmore, A. and Marks, S. in ‘The Imperial Factor in South Africa in the Nineteenth Century: Towards a Reassessment’, J. Imp. Commonwealth Hist., III, 1 (1974), stress the efficacy of informal empire without investigating the processes of state formation which facilitated it.Google Scholar

12 See Midgley, J. F., ‘The Orange River Sovereignty, 1848–1854’ in Archives Year Book for South African History, 1949, 2 (Cape Town, 1949).Google Scholar

13 Galbraith, Reluctant Empire, 271;Google ScholarBell, K. N. and Morrell, W. P. (eds.), Select Documents on British Colonial Policy, 1830–1860 (Oxford, 1928), 531–3;Google Scholar also de Kok, K. J., Empires of the Veld (Durban, 1904), 46, 205.Google Scholar On early land titles, see Baumann, G. and Bright, E., Lost Republic: The Biography of a Land–Surveyor (London, 1940), 239–55.Google Scholar

14 On the constitutional history of the Free State see Scholtz, G. D., Die Konstitusie en Staatsinstellings van die Oranje-Vrystaat, 1854–1902 (Amsterdam, 1937).Google Scholar

15 A case–study is provided from the northeastern part of the state in the person of C. J. de Villiers: see Keegan, T., ‘White Settlement and Black Subjugation on the Highveld: The Tlokoa Heartland in the Northeastern Orange Free State, 1850–1914’ in Beinart, W. and Delius, P. (eds.), Putting a Plough to the Ground: Accumulation and Dispossession in Rural South Africa, 1850–1930 (Johannesburg, 1986).Google Scholar

16 Collins, W. W., Free Statia: Reminiscences of a Lifetime in the Orange Free State (1907, reprinted Cape Town, 1965), chs. 3–5.Google Scholar

17 Huet, P., ‘Reisjournaal: verhaal van een uitstapje uit Aliwal naar de Fransche zendelingstatien in het Basutooland’, Elpis, I (1857), 182–5;Google Scholar Reports of Missionary Conferences, 17 April 1855, JME, 1855, 333Google Scholar, and 2 May 1857, JME, 1857, 406–7.Google Scholar

18 Midgley, ‘Orange River Sovereignty’, 27, 44;Google ScholarEllenberger, V., A Century of Mission Work in Basutoland, 1833–1933 (Morija, 1938), 58–9;Google ScholarPellissier to PEMS, 1 October 1849, in Pellissier, 394–8; GS 1564, 15–16Google Scholar, T. W. Vowe to Pellissier, 10 May 1849. The boundary arbitration of March 1849 is to be found in GS 1564, 14. The OS (Government Secretary) series is to be found in the Orange Free State Archives, Bloemfontein.Google Scholar

19 Ross, Adam Kok's Griquas, ch. 5.Google Scholar

20 Schoeman, K. (ed.), Die Huis van die Armes: Die Berlynse Sendinggenootskap in die O.V.S., 1833–1869 (Cape Town, 1985), 11–12, 64, 102–3;Google ScholarSouth African Archival Records, Orange Free State (SAAR, OFS), II, 333–9;Google Scholarvan Aswegen, H. J., ‘Die Verhouding tussen Blank en nie-Blank in die Oranje-Vrystaat, 1854–1902’ in Archives Year Book for South African History, 1971, 1 (Pretoria, 1977), 67–77.Google Scholar

21 SAAR, OFS, III, 521Google Scholar, Lephoi to President Boshof, 23 October 1858;Google ScholarIbid. 522, Lephoi to J. Sauer, 24 November 1858;Google Scholar also GS 1564, 32, Lephoi to Boshof, 21 September 1858;Google ScholarGS 1564, 39–40, Lephoi and sons to Boshof, 8 November 1858.Google Scholar

22 The inhabitants of the Kat River settlement in the Cape Midlands were victims of the surge of productive and commercial capital in the middle years of the century. The bulk of their lands had been finally cleared for white–owned sheep after their rebellion of 1851 had been crushed. See Kirk, T., ‘Progress and decline in the Kat River Settlement’, J. Afr. Hist., XIV, 3 (1973).Google Scholar

23 GS 1564, 45, Notice of Appointment of George Donovan as Agent, Lephoi, 23 December 1858; SAAR, OFS, IV, 302, Lephoi and Raad, 18 May 1859; GS 1565, 48, Lephoi and Raad to President Snyman, 26 May 1859.Google Scholar

24 Many of Donovan's papers (deeds of sales, promissory notes, receipts) are to be found in GS 1564.Google Scholar

25 GS 1565, 99, ‘Special Authoriteit’, Lephoi, 10 August 1859; GS 1567, 55–8, Martinus Leeuw, Andries Geel and 16 others to President Pretorius, n.d.Google Scholar

26 Pellissier to PEMS, 1 June 1856, in Pellissier, 436–7;Google ScholarPellissier to Casalis, 12 July 1858, in Pellissier, 454.Google Scholar

27 SAAR, OFS, IV, 185 and 187Google Scholar, Lephoi and Raad to Volksraad, 2 February 1859 and undated.Google Scholar

28 See Ross, Adam Kok's Griquas, ch. 6.Google Scholar

29 GS 1565, 35–6, Lephoi to Boshof, n.d.; GS 1565, 37–8, Kok to Lephoi, 20 February 1859;Google ScholarGS 1565, 49–52, Kok to Snyman, 30 May 1859;Google ScholarSAAR, OFS, IV, 303–4, Kok to Snyman, 10 August 1859.Google Scholar

30 See SAAR, OFS, IV, 298, ‘Notulen der Byeenkomst…’, 3 June 1859; GS 1564, 48–9, Leina Lephoi's statement before President Boshof, Boschesspruit, 21 December 1858.Google Scholar

31 CS 1565, 81–4, Lephoi to Sauer, 9 June 1859; CS 1565, 8–6, Pellissier to Snyman, 13 June 1859.Google Scholar

32 SAAR, OFS, III, 522, Lephoi to Sauer, 24 November 1858;Google ScholarCS 1564, 35–8, Lephoi and sons to Boshof, 8 November 1858;Google ScholarCS 1564, 53–4, Lephoi to Boshof, 24 December 1858;Google ScholarSAAR, OFS, IV, 185–7, Lephoi and Raad to Volksraad, 2 February 1859;Google Scholaribid. 302–3, Lephoi to Snyman, 2 May 1859.

33 SAAR, OFS, IV, 188–91, Orpen to Boshof, 24 January 1859.Google Scholar

34 SAAR, OFS, IV, 31, Volksraadsnotule, 21 February 1859;Google Scholaribid., 105, Aanspraak den Staatspresident, 8 February 1859.

35 GS 1566, 61–74, Donovan's Memorandum enclosed in Donovan to President and Volksraad, 12 July 1860.Google Scholar

36 Prinsloo, A., Die Geskiedenis van Smithfield en die Caledonrivierdistrik, 1819–1952 (Bloemfontein, 1955), 134, 149–50;Google ScholarCollins, Free Statia, 49–51;Google ScholarSchuh to PEMS, 5 June 1854Google Scholar, JME, 1854, 333–4.Google Scholar

37 SAAR, OFS, 11, 259–60, W. Auret to President Hoffman, 18 March 1854.Google Scholar

38 The missionary Daumas estimated that the Boers carried off 4,000 head of cattle, 4,000 sheep and 400–500 horses. ‘Mission Française du Lessouto’, JME, 1858, 331.Google Scholar Sauer's son confirms that his father gained much wealth from cattle booty: Sauer, H., Ex Africa (London, 1937), 1.Google Scholar The case for Sauer's duplicity is provided in Balfet, F., Samuel Rolland, 1801–1873: Pionier van die Sending in die Vrystaat, ed. and transl. Schoeman, K. (Cape Town, 1984, originally published in French, Paris, 1914), 94–101.Google Scholar Documentation on these events is to be found in Theal, G. (comp.), Basutoland Records, 4 vols. (Cape Town, 1883, reprinted 1964), II, esp. 332–3, 443–68.Google Scholar

39 The minutes of the commission's meeting of 3–4 June 1859 are to be found in SAAR, OFS, IV, 295–302.Google Scholar

40 GS 1565 90–91, Pellissier to Snyman, 25 June 1859.Google Scholar

41 Notulen der Verrigtingen van den Hoogedelen Volksraad, 1859–1860 (Bloemfontein, 1871), 19–27, 10–14 February 1860.Google Scholar

42 GS 1565, 153–4, Pellissier to Secretary of Volksraad, 2 March 1860;Google ScholarGS 1566, 5–7, Notulen van den Uitvoerende Raad, 19 March 1860;Google ScholarGS 1565, 142–4, Orpen to Volksraad, II February 1860;Google ScholarGS 1565, 149–51, Pellissier to Volksraad, 20 February 1860; Pellissier, 636–8.Google Scholar

43 GS 1566, 15, Lephoi to Sauer, 1 April 1860;Google ScholarGS 1566, 54–7, Andries Geel and 70 others to President and Volksraad, 12 July 1860;Google ScholarCS 1566, 35–9, Byeenkomst gehouden te Bethulie…, 7 June 1860;Google Scholar CS 1566, 45–8, Donovan and three others to President Pretorius, 2 July 1860. Of the 34 farms surveyed by the land commission, 22 were in the hands of whites (having either been granted by or bought from Lephoi or his people), ten in the hands of Lephoi and his sons, and only two still in the hands of his Bastaard Raadsleden.

44 See CS 1566, 50–3, 61–74, Donovan to President and Volksraad, 2 July 1860, and enclosed Memorandum.Google Scholar

45 CS 1566, 5–7, Andries Ceel and 70 others to President and Volksraad, 12 July 1860;Google ScholarCS 1567, 55–8, Martinus Leeuw and 17 others to Pretorius, n.d. They described the three as behaving toward Lephoi like ‘midwives around a woman in labour’.Google Scholar

46 CS 1567, 96–103, S. J. de Plooij and 61 others to President and Volksraad, nd., May 1860.Google Scholar

47 GS 1566, 122–3, Deed of Sale, 27 December 1860;Google ScholarGS 1566, 182–3, J. S. du Plooy to Volksraad, 23 March 1861;Google Scholar‘Schets Geschiedenis van Boesmans School, nu Bethulie’, Orange Free State Monthly Magazine, 2, 22 (08 1879), 990–91;Google Scholar‘Sales of Farms and Erven at Bethulia’, Friend of the Free State (Bloemfontein), 7 06 1861.Google Scholar

48 R. Miles to G. Donovan, n.d., published ‘by request’ in The Friend of the Free State, 30 November 1860;Google ScholarGS 1564, 146–7, van Iddekinge to Government Secretary, 18 September 1860.Google Scholar

49 The following from GS 1564; 178, Lephoi to Acting President Allison, 20 October 1862;Google Scholar190–1, Lephoi to Allison, 17 April 1863; 195–6, Lephoi to Allison, 15 June 1863; 197, Lephoi and others to President Venter, 22 June 1863; 199–200, Mantjes Lephoi to President Brand, 18 February 1864; 202–3, Lephoi to Brand, 4 April 1864.Google Scholar

50 GS 1566, 61–74, Donovan's Memorandum, 12 July 1860. The landdros's record book of receipts and expenditure on Lephoi's behalf is to be found in GS 1567.Google Scholar

51 Pellissier to PEMS, 16 March 1863, in Pellissier, 474.Google Scholar

52 GS 1564, 170–71 and 180–81, Miles to Pretorius, 12 December 1860 and 26 December 1862.Google Scholar

53 ‘Obituary: George Donovan’, Friend of the Free State, 13 May 1898;Google Scholar also Agar-Hamilton, J. A. I., The Road to the North, 1852–1886 (London, 1937), 170–1, 281, 291, 296–7, 439–40;Google ScholarShillington, K., The Colonisation of the Southern Tswana, 1870–1900 (Johannesburg, 1985), 142–3, 159, 160.Google Scholar

54 SAAR, OFS, III, 379;Google ScholarMidgley, ‘Orange River Sovereignty’, 146.Google Scholar

55 See Pellissier, ch. 38.Google Scholar

56 ‘Schets Geschiedenis’, OFS Monthly Magazine, 2, 22 (1879), 989;Google ScholarTheal, Basutoland Records, II, 592.Google Scholar See Keegan, T., ‘Trade, Accumulation and Impoverishment: Mercantile Capital and the Economic Transformation of Lesotho and the Conquered Territory, 1870–1920’, J. Southern Afr. Studies, XII, 2 (04 1986).Google Scholar

57 See Keegan, T., ‘The dynamics of rural accumulation in South Africa: historicals and comparative perspectives’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, XXVIII, 4 (10 1986).Google Scholar