Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:33:28.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BANKOE V. DOME: TRADITIONS AND PETITIONS IN THE HO-ASOGLI AMALGAMATION, BRITISH MANDATED TOGOLAND, 1919–39

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2005

BENJAMIN N. LAWRANCE
BENJAMIN N. LAWRANCE
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article investigates Ewe engagement with British administrative policy via the story of a chieftaincy dispute in Ho, British Mandated Togoland, that erupted when Britain attempted to amalgamate two neighboring chieftaincies, Ho-Dome and Ho-Bankoe, by deploying a model with an ‘ethnic stamp’, that of the neighboring Akan states. Colonial-era chieftaincy has received substantial scholarly attention. This article argues that the relationship between the models deployed to reorganize chiefly power and the roles of protagonists is just as significant as the layered conflicts within chieftaincies and their respective clans. Two responses to ‘Akanized’ amalgamation are investigated: the petitions of its opponents, and the rituals developed by chiefs, priests and peasants to herald the amalgamations.

Keywords

GhanaTogochieftaincycolonial administrationindirect rule
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , July 2005 , pp. 243 - 267
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author thanks Richard Roberts, Emily Osborn, Walter Hawthorne, Paul Nugent, Kate Collier, Sara Berry, Cynthia Brantley, Bettina Ng'weno and Ruby Andrew for their comments.