Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:22:21.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XII. Chinese Financiers and Chetti Bankers in Southern Waters: Asian Mobile Credit during the Anglo-Dutch Competition for the Trade of the Eastern Archipelago in the Nineteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2010

Rajat Kanta Ray
Rajat Kanta Ray
Affiliation:
Delhi School of Economics
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Certain European notions of the nature of the Asian economies — especially the peddling character of Asian trade and its contrast with the rational capitalist business organization which was supposed to be a purely European enclave superimposed by conquest on the peddling, precapitalist basis of Asian production and exchange — were formulated most clearly of all by Dutch sociologists and economists from their experience of Netherlands India of the nineteenth century and of the Eastern Archipelago in the age of Portuguese and Dutch voyages. They were not unaware of the existence of Chinese and Indian business groups in Southeast Asia with some of the features of early modern capitalism, but these were regarded as the bastard offspring of developed European capitalism. Such immigrant Asian groups were supposed to have sprung from the need of the Europeans for intermediaries to deal with the economically innocent natives and were thought to be completely dependent on servicing the European enclave with no autonomous business concerns of their own. This essay focusses on the Chinese financiers and Chetti bankers operating long distance credit networks in the Southern Ocean (Nanyang) before and after the opening of the Suez Canal (1869). The aim is to show that these immigrant business groups derived from a sophisticated financial and mercantile background in their home countries and that they conducted autonomous operations in the Eastern Archipelago with their own capital and business techniques: a large volume of such operations were conducted within a purely inter-Asian framework quite apart from the colonial trade with Europe, and in their dealings with the Dutch and the English banks and corporations, these towkays and nagarathars showed a strength and resilience which made ‘dependence’ and ‘collaboration’ a mutual process.

Type
Articles
Information
Itinerario , Volume 11 , Issue 1: India and Indonesia from the 1830s to 1914: The Heyday of Colonial Rule , March 1987 , pp. 209 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Leur, J. C. Van, Indonesian Trade and Society. Essays in Asian Social and Economic History (Bandung 1955) passimGoogle Scholar.

2 Boeke, J. H., Economics and Economic Policy of Dual Societies as Exemplified by Indonesia (New York 1953) 12–15Google Scholar.

3 The nineteenth century European term —‘Indian’ or ‘Malayan’ Archipelago— is, 1 imagine, unsatisfactory to my Indonesian colleagues, and for the same sort of reason, ‘Indonesian’ Archipelago might be objected to in Singapore and Kuala Lumpur. The difficulty arises from the fact that a commercially homogeneous area is now divided by the accidents of colonial and post-colonial political history into Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. The Chinese had a more ancient and commercially more meaningful term for the entire area — Nanyang. As Wang Gunguru points out, the area of the Nanyang is no t conterminous with Southeast Asia but is rather to be identified as those areas reached by the Chinese (and one might add, Indians) by sea and not by land: i.e., the maritime belt of the Malay peninsula, the Irrawaddy, Menam and Mekong valleys and the islands stretching outwards from the Straits of Malacca. Gunguru, Wang, A Short History of the Nanyang Chinese (Singapore 1959) 1ffGoogle Scholar.

4 Towkay is a Hokkien expression meaning ‘the head of a business’, but is used by other Nanyang Chinese groups as well to denote the financial and commercial magnates within the community. Nagarathar, literally ‘bourgeois’ or ‘townsman’, is a.term applied to members of the Nattukottai Chettiar community of Tamil Nadu, a banking caste divided into several nagarams or ‘towns’ (exogamous clans) with a temple at the head of each.

5 Earl, G. F., The Eastern Seas or Voyages and Adventures in the Indian Archipelago in 1832-33-comprising a Tour of the Island ofJava — Visits to Borneo, the Malay Peninsula, Siam, & c; Account of the Present State of Singapore, with Observations on the Commercial Resources Archipelago (London 1837) 23–24 and passimGoogle Scholar.

6 Quoted by Money, J. W. B., Java; or, How to Manage a Colony. A Practical Solution of the now Affecting British India I (London 1861) 300 and 325Google Scholar.

7 Day, Clive, The Policy and Administration of the Dutch in Java (London 1904) 360Google Scholar.

8 Money, Java, 39.

9 In a consular report on the trade of the Archipelago, the distinction was clearly drawn by the American trade consul, who commented: ‘It is this trade in Dutch East Indian products, carried on by the Chinese, that has built up Singapore into one of the greatest primary markets of the world.’ Elrige, Frank R., Trading with Asia (New York 1921) 197 (Far Eastern Division of the U.S. Bureau of Foreign Domestic Commerce)Google Scholar.

10 ‘The Bugguese prows from Celebes and other parts of the Eastern Islands, will resort to the settlement of Singapore with their goods, and barter them for manufactures, in preference t o going to Malacca or Batavia, and it will soon become a depot for the Eastern traders.’ J. Horsburgh in a letter to Raffles, quoted in Raffles, Sophia, Memoir of the Life and Public Services ofSir Stamford Raffles […] and Selections from his Correspondence (London 1830) 401Google Scholar

11 Raffles' minute ‘On the Administration of the Eastern Islands 1819’ given in the appendix to Sophia Raffles, Memoir, 5-10.

12 Earl, , Eastern Seas, 237 and passim.Google Scholar By the time of Earl's voyage, the junk fleets from Amoy and other South China ports annually voyaging to Nanyang had deserted Batavia for Singapore and the Bugis prahus were weaving their way through the maze of unpoliced channels i n the Archipelago to the free port in annually increasing numbers. Ibidem, 23-24.

13 The NHM operated only in the trade between Java and Holland and the Dutch ships seldom penetrated beyond Java. Ibidem, 24-25, 32-33.

14 Davidson, G. F., Trade and Travel in the Far East; or Recollections of Twenty One Years Passed -Java, Singapore, Australia and China (London 1846)Google Scholar.

15 Ken, Wong Lin, ‘The Trade of Singapore 1819-1869’, Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 33 (1960) 81–83;Google ScholarTurnbull, C. M., The Straits Settlements 1826-67. Indian Residency to Crown Colony (Singapore 1972) 169, 185Google Scholar.

16 Earl, , Eastern Seas, 177;Google ScholarWright, Arnold ed., Twentieth Century Impressions of British Malaya. Its History, People, Commerce, Industries and Resources (London 1908) 716, 726Google Scholar.

17 Sir Frank Swettenham's Malayan Journals 1874-1876. Burns, P. L. and Cowan, C. D. eds. (Kuala Lumpur 1975) 153–154, 156-157 (20, 21 and 25 November 1874)Google Scholar.

18 Siok-Hwa, Cheng, The Rice Industry of Burma 1852-1940 (Kuala Lumpur 1968) 185–190;Google ScholarReport of the Burma Provincial Banking Enquiry Committee 1929-301 (Rangoon 1930) 105, 203Google Scholar.

19 Nattukottai Chettiars had the following expectation of comparative rates of return on capital: Madras, 8-9%; Ceylon, 10-12%; Burma, 12-15%; the Straits Settlements and Federated Malay States, 15-18%. Madras Provincial Banking Enquiry Committee 1929-30 IV (Madras 1930) 339Google Scholar.

20 Ibidem, 243.

21 Wright, Arnold ed., Twentieth Century Impressions of Netherlands India. Its History, People, merce, Industries and Resources (London 1909) 557–558Google Scholar.

22 Raffles' minute of 1819, Sophia Raffles, Memoir, 12.

23 Furnivall, J. S., Studies in the Social and Economic Development of the Netherlands East (Rangoon c. 1933) 2, paper III, State and Private Money-LendingGoogle Scholar.

24 Even in the heyday of Malacca in the sixteenth century, the native trade.of the Archipelago, though certainly not confined to hawkers and pedlars, was not supported by an indigenous money market. There were merchants well provided with capital and dealers in luxury articles and handlers of bulk cargoes. But there was no advanced form of accountancy and no banking and credit system that would have made an international traffic in money possible. Meilink-Roelofsz, M.A.P., Asian Trade and European Influence in the Indonesian Archi pelago between 1500 and about 1630 (The Hague 1962) 7–8Google Scholar.

25 When a questionaire framed in India instructed the Burma Banking Enquiry Committee to find out who the ‘indigenous bankers’ were, the committee was constrained to reply that ‘indigenous banking in Burma was imported by Indians, especially Nattukottai Chettiars’. There was, in that sense, an indigenous money market in Mogul Street, Rangoon, connected with Calcutta, Bombay, Madras, Colombo, Penang, Singapore and Saigon. Burma Banking Report, 186.

26 Cameron, James, Our Tropical Possessions in Malayan India (London 1865; reprint Kuala Lumpur 1965) 135Google Scholar.

27 Davidson, , Trade and Travel, 76Google Scholar.

28 Tamagna, Frank M., Banking and Finance in China (New York 1942) 13;Google ScholarBhargava, Brijkishore, Indigenous Banking in Ancient and Medieval India (Bombay 1934) 165Google Scholar.

29 Wagel, Srinivas R., Chinese Currency and Banking (Shanghai 1915) 146–147;Google ScholarKalhana, , Rajata-rangini. trans. Pandit, Ramjit Sitaram (New Delhi 1977) 208, 209, 211Google Scholar.

30 Bhargava, Indigenous Banking, passim; Wagel, Chinese Currency, passim.

31 Cameron, , Our Tropical Possessions, 135; Day, Dutch Policy and Administration, 345Google Scholar.

32 The Javanese traders, according to an anthropological survey in , Modjokuto, ‘are members of a community which is numerically larger and socially more loosely organized than the Chinese, who pooled their capital and extended their credit through community groupings’. Dewey, Alice J., Peasant Marketing in Java (New York 1962) 46–47Google Scholar.

33 Burma Banking Report, 186; Jain, L. C., Indigenous Banking in India (London 1929) 27–34Google Scholar.

34 Purcell, Victor, The Chinese in Southeast Asia (Kuala Lumpur 1980) passim;Google ScholarSiang, Song Ong, One Hundred Years' History of the Singapore Chinese. Being a Chronological Record of the of the Chinese Community to the Development, Progress and Prosperity of Singapore; of Events Incidents Concerning the Whole or Sections of that Community; and of the Lives, Pursuits and Service of Individual Members thereoffrom the Foundation of Singapore on 6th February 1819 to Centenary on 6th February 1919 (London 1923) 67Google Scholar.

35 Selections from the Records of the Bombay Government. New Series no. 212. Hadthramut and the Colonies in the Indian Archipelago. Berg, L.W.C. Van den ed., trans. Sealey, C. W. H. (Bombay 1887) 32, 45-51Google Scholar.

36 Quoted in Hao, Yen-Ping, The Comprador in Nineteenth Century China. Bridge between East West (Harvard 1970) 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar The trade between the South China coast and Nanyang had for centuries been carried in Chinese junks. Even when European steamships intruded on this run, the junks persisted for some time. Finally the Chinese themselves began to employ steamships. Song, Singapore Chinese, passim.

37 Arnold Wrights directory of Chinese and Chetti firms in Penang, Singapore, Batavia, Sema-rang and Surabaya is the basis of the above conclusion. Wright, British Malaya, passim; idem, Netherlands India, passim.

38 The above details are taken from A. Savarinatha Pillai, ‘Monograph on Nattukottai Chettis' banking business’, Madras Banking'Report III, 1170ff; Burma Banking Report 1, 343 and passim; Mackenzie, Compton, Realms of Silver. One Hundred Years of Banking in the East (London 1954) 106–113;Google ScholarThurston, Edgar, Castes and Tribes of Southern India V (Madras 1909) 250Google Scholar.

39 Pillai, , ‘Monograph’, 1170Google Scholar.

40 Ibidem, 1171-1172, 1179-1180; Thurston, , Castesand Tribes, 254–257Google Scholar.

41 Dampier, William, Voyages and Discoveries (London 1931) 195Google Scholar.

42 Tan Che Sang was the first Chinese merchant to set up, along with Napier, Mackenzie and Scott, a substantial warehouse in Singapore. Raffles to Dr. Wallich, 8 February 1825, Sophia Raffles, Memoir, 537.

43 Seah Eu Chin, one of the prominent early Chinese merchants of Singapore who eventually became a member of the Singapore Chamber of Commerce, started as a clerk and pedlar on various junks sailing to Riau, Sumatra and Malayan ports and eventually set up a commission agency and general trading firm in Singapore with regular trade relations with these places. Song, Singapore Chinese, 19-20.

44 Wang, , Nanyang Chinese, 24–25Google Scholar.

45 Thio Tiauw Siat, alias His Excellency Chang Chin Hsun, Minister for the Emperor of China and Consul^General for China in Singapore. Emigrated from Canton to Batavia 1840. Opium farmer to the Dutch in earlycareer. Extended opium operations to the Straits. Set up the firm, Ban Yoo Hin (1886), running three steamers from Achin to the Straits Settlements. Invested in tin mines in the Malay peninsula. In later life, Director of Canton Railway and partner of the Bank of China. Wright, , British Malaya, 777–781;Google ScholarSong, , Singapore Chinese, 387.Google Scholar Oei Tiorig Ham, alias Hung Chung-Han, born Semarang 1866. Inherited from father (an immigrant Totok from China) the Handel Maatschappij Kian Gwan, which became the leding Chinese sugar and rice firm of Java with offices in Semarang, Surabaya and Batavia i n the 1890s. From sugar plantations in Java and import trade in rice from Rangoon, Siam and Saigon, he expanded his concerns to steamships running between Java and Singapore, and subsequently to banking. Suryadinata, Leo, Eminent Indonesian Chinese. Biographical Sketches (Singapore 1978) 106–107;Google ScholarWright, , British Malaya, 180;Google ScholarWright, , Netherlands India, 476, 546-548;Google ScholarSong, , Singapore Chinese, 352–353Google Scholar.

46 Wright, , Netherlands India, 509–512Google Scholar.

47 Ibidem, 550.

48 Ibidem, 482.

49 Ibidem, passim; Wright, British Malaya, passim; Song, Singapore Chinese, passim; Purcell, Chinese in Southeast Asia, passim; Cheng, Rice Industry of Burma, passim.

50 Purcell, , Chinese in Southeast Asia, 195–197Google Scholar.

51 Elvin, Mark and Skinner, G. William eds., The Chinese City Between Two Worlds (Stanford 1974) 76–77, 104Google Scholar.

52 Earl, , Eastern Seas, 286–287, 291-292Google Scholar.

53 Wright, , Netherlands India, 287Google Scholar.

54 Vaughan, J. D., The Manners and Customs of the Chinese of the Straits Settlements (Singapore 1879) 98, 109, 113Google Scholar.

55 Wright, , British Malaya, 154–160Google Scholar.

56 Song, , Singapore Chinese, 217–218Google Scholar.

57 Wagel, , Chinese Currency, 183–185Google Scholar.

58 Mackenzie, , Realms of Silver, 198Google Scholar.

59 Ibidem, 76-77.

60 Tavernier, Jean Baptiste, Travels in India. Crooke, W. ed. (London 1925) 36–38Google Scholar.

61 Blundell, Peter, The City of Many Waters (London 1923) 126Google Scholar.

62 Phipps, John, A Practical Treatise on the China and Eastern Trade: Comprising the Commerce of Great Britain and India, Particularly Bengal and Singapore, with China and the Eastern Islands […] Adapted to the Use of Merchants, Commanders, Pursers and Others, Connected with the Trade of China and India (Calcutta 1835) 129Google Scholar.

63 Osborn, S., Quedah, or Stray Leaves from a Journal in Malayan Waters (London 1865) 216ff;Google ScholarCameron, , Our Tropical Possessions, 184Google Scholar.

64 Phipps, , Practical Guide, 23–24Google Scholar.

65 Ibidem, 269.

66 Singapore Free Press, 21 May 1864, extract in Song, , Singapore Chinese, 126–127Google Scholar.

67 Ibidem.

68 Wang, , ‘Trade of Singapore’, 164–165, quoting Singapore Free PressGoogle Scholar.

69 Singapore Free Press, 21 May 1864, extract.

70 Cameron, , Our Tropical Possessions, 139.Google Scholar There were enough rich men within the community to generate this kind of credit. Tan Kim Seng, who died the same year, was ‘worth close upon two million of dollars’. Ibidem.

71 Mackenzie, , Realms of Silver, 105–106Google Scholar.

72 This was the established practice in Penang around 1875 when the Chartered Bank established its branch there. Ibidem, 110, 112.

73 Ibidem, 108-109, 112.

74 Purcell, The Chinese in Southeast Asia, 197n; Burma Banking Report, 213.

75 Wright, , British Malaya, 141Google Scholar.

76 Evidence of Nattukottai Nagarathars' Association, Madras, in Madras Banking Report III, 1103. The usual method employed by the nagarathars in lending money in the Straits was to accept as security a promissory note signed by the borrower and endorsed by one approved guarantor. Wright, , British Malaya, 141Google Scholar.

77 Ibidem.

78 Ibidem, 140.

79 Ibidem, 141.

80 Burma Banking Report I, 191; VII, 499.

81 Thavanai deposits were taken by the nagarathars in overseas centres from outsiders. In Rangoon they met every week to determine the Thavani rates, as distinct from the Nadappu rates payable on deposits from their own community. The loans from outsiders were repayable after a definite period of rest (thavanai), 2 month s in Rangoon, 3 months to one year in the Straits and Ceylon. Pillai,‘Monograph’, 1171, 1179.

82 Pillai, ‘Monograph’, passim; Burma Banking Report 1, 343; Cheng, , Burma Rice, 174Google Scholar.

83 The Imperial Gazetteer of India. The Indian Empire II, Economic (new ed. Oxford 1908) 441;Google ScholarMackenzie, , Realms of Silver, 40Google Scholar.

84 Ibidem, 112-113.

85 Pillai, , ‘Monograph’, 1186–1187Google Scholar.

86 Ibidem, 1177.

87 Oral evidence of Sevaga Chettiar and Arunachalam Chettiar, Madras Banking Report IV, Oral Evidence, 244-247.

88 Vaughan, Manners and Customs, 3ff.

89 See amount of as a typical the origins of Ong Hai & Co., Song, , Singapore Chinese, 171–173Google Scholar.

90 Ibidem, 217-218.

91 Mackenzie, , Realms of Silver, 108Google Scholar.

92 Davidson, , Trade and Travel, 55–56;Google ScholarWong, , ‘The Trade of Singapore’, 113Google Scholar.

93 Vaughan, , Manners and Customs, 10Google Scholar.

94 Song, , Singapore Chinese, 187Google Scholar.

95 Ibidem, 67-68.

96 Wright, , British Malaya, 145Google Scholar.

97 Song, , Singapore Chinese, 107Google Scholar.

98 Suryadinata, Leo, Eminent Indonesian Chinese, Biographical Sketches (Singapore 1978) 5Google Scholar.

99 Day, , Dutch Policy and Administration, 362Google Scholar.

100 J. M. Allison's despatch from Manchester protesting against the injustice to Chinese traders, quoted in Song, , Singapore Chinese, 382–383Google Scholar.

101 Furnivall, J. S., Netherlands India. A Study of Plural Economy (Cambridge 1944) 336.Google Scholar

102 Burma Banking Report I, 205.

103 The Sze Hai Tong Banking and Insurance Company, which was a collective Teochew enterprise, had as one of its promoters Tan Swi Phiau, a comprador of the Netherlands India Commercial Bank, but he was independently a shareholder in two companies trading n i pepper, gambier and gutta-percha. Wright, , British Malaya, 146Google Scholar.