Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:42:55.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Study of Contrasts across Europe: An Interview with Patrick O'Brien

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2011

Peer Vries
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Interview
Information
Itinerario , Volume 23 , Issue 3-4 , November 1999 , pp. 9 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 See for example O'Brien, P.K and Keyder, C., Economic Growth in Britain and France, 1770-1914: Two Paths to the Twentieth Century (London 1978)Google Scholar; O'Brien, P.K., ‘Do We Have a Typology for the Study of European Industrialization in the XlXth Century?’, Journal of European Economic History 15 (1986) 291–333;Google ScholarO'Brien, P.K, ‘Introduction: Modern Conceptions of the Industrial Revolution’ in: O'Brien, P.K and Quinault, R. eds, The Industrial Revolution and British Society (Cambridge 1993) 1–30;CrossRefGoogle ScholarO'Brien, P.K, ‘Path Dependency, or Why Britain Became an Industrialised and Urbanised Economy Long Before France’, EconomicHistory Review XLIX (1996) 213–248 andGoogle ScholarO'Brien, P.K ed., Industrialisation: Critical Perspectives on the World Economy (London 1998)Google Scholar.

2 See for example Bloch, M., ‘Pour une histoire comparee des sociétés Européennes’, Revue de Synthese Historique 46 (1928) 15–50Google Scholar.

3 Coleman, D.C., ‘Proto-industrialization: A Concept too Many’, Economic History Review, second series 36 (1983) 435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 For an overview see O'Brien, P.K, ‘European Economic Development: The Contribution of the Periphery’, Economic History Review, second series 35 (1982) 1–18;CrossRefGoogle ScholarO'Brien, P.K, ‘The Foundations of European Industrialization: From the Perspective of the World’ in: Pardo, José Casas ed., Economic Effects of the European Expansion, 1492–1824 (Stuttgart 1992) 462–502;Google ScholarO'Brien, P.K and Escosura, L. Prados de la, ‘Balance Sheets for the Acquisition, Retention and Loss of European Empires Overseas’, Itinerario XXIII/3–4 (1999) 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also idem eds, The Costs and Benefits ofEuropean Imperialism from the Conquest ofCeuta, 1415 to the Treaty of Lusaka, 1974, a special issue of the Revista de Historia Economica 16 (1980) 1–42,Google Scholar published in Madrid in 1998.

5 Wallerstein, I.M., The Modern World-system I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York 1974).Google Scholar

6 See note 32.

7 See for example O'Brien, P.K and Engerman, S.L., ‘Exports and the Growth of the British Economy from the Glorious Revolution to the Peace of Amiens’ in: Solow, B. ed., Slavery and the Rise of the Atlantic System (Cambridge 1991) 177–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Asthon, T.S., The Industrial Revolution, 1760–1820 (Oxford 1948).Google Scholar

9 K. Pomeranz, ‘From “Early Modern” to “Modern” and Back Again: Levels, Trends and Economic Transformation in the 18th-19th Century Eurasia’, paper presented at the All-U.C. Group in Economic History Conference ‘On the Origins of the Modern World: Comparative Perspectives from the Edge of the Millennium’, University of California, Davis 15–17 October 1999.

10 Wrigley, E.A., Continuity, Chance and Change: The Character of the Industrial Revolution in England (Cambridge 1988) 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 For the concepts ‘Smithian’ and ‘Schumpeteria n growth’ see Mokyr, j., The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress (New York and Oxford 1990) 3–16Google Scholar.

12 Jones, E.L., The European Miracle: Environments, Economies and Geopolitics in the History of Europe and Asia (Cambridge 1981).Google Scholar The reference to the Little Englander point of view is in the ‘Introduction’ to the second edition, XVI-XIX.

13 Bairoch, P., Révolution industrielle et sous-développement (The Hague 1974) 140–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Frank, A. Gunder, ReOrient, Global Economy in the Asian Age (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London 1998)Google Scholar; Goldstone, J.A., ‘The Problem of the ‘Early Modern World’, Journal of Social and Economic History of the Orient 41 (1998) 249–284 andCrossRefGoogle ScholarPomeranz, K., The Great Divergence: China, Europe and the Making of the Modern World Economy (Princeton 2000)Google Scholar.

15 See Chaudhuri, K.N., Asia before Europe: Economy and Civilisation of the Indian Ocean from the Rise of Islam to 1750 (Cambridge 1990).Google Scholar

16 See for example O'Brien, P.K, The Revolution in Egypt's Economic System (London 1966)Google Scholar.

17 Jones, The European Miracle and Jones, E.L., Growth Recurring: Economic Change in World History (Oxford 1988)Google Scholar.

18 For Frank's, criticism see for example his ReOrient, 41–42.Google Scholar For O'Brien's ideas on imperialism see O'Brien, P.K, ‘The Costs and Benefits of British Imperialism, 1846–1914’, Past & Present 120 (1988) 163–200 andCrossRefGoogle ScholarO'Brien, P.K, ‘Intercontinental Trade and the Development of the Third World since the Industrial Revolution’ Journal of World History 8 (1997) 75–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Gills, B.K and Frank, A.G. eds, The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand? (London 1993).Google Scholar

20 Elvin, M., The Pattern of the Chinese Past (Stanford 1973) chapter 17.Google Scholar

21 Landes, D.S., The Wealth and Poverty ofNations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor (New York 1998) 516.Google Scholar

22 See Elvin, , The Pattern of the Chinese Past, 284–316.Google Scholar For the ideas of Needham see Cohen, H.F., The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry (Chicago 1994) 418–482Google Scholar.

23 Mokyr, , The Lever of Riches, 209–238.Google Scholar So did Needham, see note 22.

24 Deng, K., Chinese Maritime Activities and Socioeconomic Development (London 1997).Google Scholar

25 On British taxes see O'Brien, P.K. and Hunt, Ph.A., ‘England 1485-1815’ in: Bonney, R. ed., The Rise of the Fiscal State in Europe (Oxford 1999) 53–100 andGoogle ScholarO'Brien, P.K, ‘The Political Economy of British Taxation, 1660–1815’, Economic History Review 41 (1988) 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For the role of laissez-faire in British industrialisation see P.K O'Brien, ‘Political Preconditions for the Industrial Revolution’ in: O'Brien, and Quinault, , The Industrial Revolution and British Society, 124–155 andGoogle ScholarO'Brien, P.K, Griffiths, T. and Hunt, P., ‘Political Components of the Industrial Revolution: Parliament and the English Cotton Textile Industry, 1660–1774’, Economic History Review 44 (1991) 395–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 See for example Wong, R. Bin, China Transformed: Historical Change and the Limits of European Experience (Cornell 1997) andGoogle ScholarWill, P.-E., ‘Developpement quantitatif et develop-pement qualitatif en Chine a la fin de l'epoque imperiale’, Annales HSS 49 (1994) 863–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Sombart, W., Kapitalismus und Krieg (München 1913).Google Scholar For a recent analysis of the relation between war, statemaking, and economic development see Weiss, L. and Hobson, J.M., States and Economic Development: A Comparative Historical Analysis (Cambridge 1995) chapters 3 and 4Google Scholar.

28 Tilly, Ch., Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1990 (Cambridge and Oxford 1990).Google Scholar

29 See for example K Schmoller, ‘Der Merkantilsystem in seiner historischen Bedeutung’ in: idem, Umrissen und Untersuchungen zur Verfassungs-, Verwaltungs- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte (Leipzig 1898).

30 For this opinion in writing see K Pomeranz on the Economic History Research-list (EH-R); Forum: Rethinking 18th century China: http://www.eh.net/ehnet/Archives/ eh.res/nov-1997/ 27–11 and 11-12-1997.

31 See for this decision Hsu, I.C.Y., The Rise of Modern China (Oxford 1983) 59–61Google Scholar.

32 Braudel, F., Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme XVe - XVIIIe siècle (Paris 1979).Google Scholar

33 See note 17.