Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:57:15.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parasites, Persons, and Princes: Evolutionary Biology of the Corporate Constitution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2016

Philip J. Stern
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Itinerario , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , December 2015 , pp. 512 - 525
Copyright
© 2016 Research Institute for History, Leiden University 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Philip Stern is Sally Dalton Robinson Associate Professor at Duke University and a specialist in the history of Britain and the British Empire particularly in the early modern period.

References

Archival sourcesGoogle Scholar
The National Archives, Kew (TNA):Google Scholar
KB21/5Google Scholar
KB21/5aGoogle Scholar
SP 97/19Google Scholar
SP 105/109Google Scholar
SP, vol. 398Google Scholar
British Library:Google Scholar
IOR E/3/90Google Scholar
IOR G/19/21Google Scholar
Lansdowne MS 56Google Scholar
Lansdowne MS 487Google Scholar
Hatfield House Archives:Google Scholar
Cecil Papers, 112/63Google Scholar
Huntington Library, California, Ellesmere:Google Scholar
Egerton Family Papers, Mss EL 9610Google Scholar
MS 2374.Google Scholar
Lincoln’s Inn Library:Google Scholar
Maynard MSS, No. 42Google Scholar
Printed sourcesGoogle Scholar
Aravamudan, Srinivas. “Hobbes and America.” In The Postcolonial Enlightenment: Eighteenth-Century Colonialism and Postcolonial Theory, edited by Daniel Carey and Lynn Festa, 37–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. “Greater Britain: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis?.” American Historical Review 104 (1999): 427–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, David. Foundations of Modern International Thought. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Barkan, Joshua. Corporate Sovereignty: Law and Government under Capitalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, W. R. The Merchants Adventurers and the continental cloth-trade (1560s–1620s). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, Lauren. “The Legal Regime of the South Atlantic World, 1400–1750: Jurisdictional Complexity at Institutional Order.” Journal of World History 11:1 (2000): 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, Lauren. Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes and World History, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren. A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren and Ross, Richard J.., eds. Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500–1850. New York: NYU Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren and Ross, Richard J... “Empires in Legal Pluralism: Jurisdiction, Sovereignty, and Political Imagination in the Early Modern World.” In Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500–1850, edited by Lauren Benton and Richard J. Ross, 1–20. New York: NYU Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Boogert, Maurits van den. The Capitulations and the Ottoman Legal System: Qadis, Consuls and Beratlis in the 18th Century. Leiden: Brill, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braddick, Michael J. State Formation in Early Modern England, c. 1550–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, T. H. Puritans and Adventurers : Change and Persistence in Early America. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Brenner, Robert. Merchants and Revolution. Commercial change, political conflict, and London’s overseas traders, 1550–1653. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Bus, J. P. “Law, sovereignty and corporation theory, 1300–1450.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c. 350–1450, edited by J. H. Burns, 454–476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Calabi, Donatella and Keene, Derek. “Merchants’ lodgings and cultural exchange.” In Cultural Exchange in Early Modern Europe. Volume 2. Cities and Cultural Exchange in Europe, 1400–1700, edited by Donatella Calabi and Stephen Turk Christensen, 315–348. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Carr, Cecil. Select Charters of Trading Companies, AD 1530–1707. London: B. Quaritch, 1913.Google Scholar
Cary, John. An Essay on the State of England, in Relation to Its Trade…. Bristol, 1695.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred and Mazlish, Bruce. “Introduction.” In Leviathans: Multinational Corporations and the New Global History, edited by Alfred Chandler and Bruce Mazlish, 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, K. N. The Trading World of Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. “Domestic Constituencies.” Z Magazine (1998). <http://chomsky.info/199805__/>, accessed 14 November 2014.,+accessed+14+November+2014.>Google Scholar
Child, Josiah. A Treatise Wherin is Demonstrated…. London, 1681.Google Scholar
Ciepley, David. “Beyond Public and Private: Toward a Political Theory of the Corporation.” American Political Science Review 107:1 (2013): 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coke, Sir Edward. The second part of the Institutes of the lawes of England containing the exposition of many ancient, and other statutes. London, 1642.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L. Medieval Foundations of the Western Intellectual Tradition, 400–1400. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Colley, Linda. “Empire of Writing: Britain, America and Constitutions, 1776–1848.” Law and History Review 32:2 (2014): 237–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormack, Bradin. A Power to do Justice: Jurisdiction, English Literature, and the Rise of the Common Law, 1509–1625. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. “Nomos and Narrative.” Harvard Law Review 97 (1983–84): 4–68.Google Scholar
Cross, Elizabeth. “The Compagnie des Indes and the Fate of Commercial Empire in the French Revolution.” Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, in progress.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, William. The Anarchy: How a Corporation Replaced the Mughal Empire, 1756–1803. London: Bloomsbury, forthcoming 2016.Google Scholar
Darwin, John. After Tamerlane: The Global History of Empire since 1405. London: Allen Lane, 2007.Google Scholar
Davenant, Charles. “Reflections upon the Constitution and Management of the African Trade, etc.” In The Political and Commercial Works of That Celebrated Writer, Charles D’Avenant, LL.D…, edited by Charles Whitworth. London, 1771.Google Scholar
Davis, John P. Corporations: A Study of the Origin and Development of Great Business Combinations and of their Relation to the Authority of the State, vol. 1. New York: G. P. Putnam, 1905.Google Scholar
Dorsett, Shaunnagh and McVeigh, Shaun. “Questions of Jurisdiction.” In Jurisprudence of Jurisdiction, edited by Shaun McVeigh, 3–18. New York: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007.Google Scholar
Eldem, Edhem. “Capitulations and Western Trade.” In The Cambridge History of Turkey, vol. 3, The Later Ottoman Empire, 1603–1839, edited by Suraiya N. Faroqhi, 283–335. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Erikson, Emily. Between Monopoly and Free Trade: The English East India Company. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Foiseneau, Luc. “Elements of Fiction in Hobbes’s System of Philosophy.” In Fiction and the Frontiers of Knowledge in Europe 1500–1800, edited by Richard Scholar and Alexis Tadié, 71–86. Farnham: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Foster, William, ed. Letters Received by the East India Company from Its Servants in the East, vol. 2, 1613–1615. London, 1897.Google Scholar
Gelderblom, Oscar. Cities of commerce. The institutional foundations of international trade in the Low Countries, 1250–1650. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Thomas, Elkins, Zachary and Melton, James. The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Gottmann, Felicia. “French-Asian Connections: The Compagnie des Indes, France’s Eastern Trade, and New Directions in Historical Scholarship.” The Historical Journal 56 (2013): 537–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafe, Regina and Irigoin, Alejandra. “A stakeholder empire: the political economy of Spanish imperial rule in America.” The Economic History Review 65:2 (2012): 609–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Jack P. Peripheries and Center: Constitutional Development in the Extended Polities of the British Empire and the United States, 1607–1788. New York: Norton, 1990.Google Scholar
Greene, Jack P. Creating the British Atlantic: Essays on Transplantation, Adaptation, and Continuity. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Grewal, David Singh. The Invention of the Economy: The Origins of Economic Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Guldi, Jo and Armitage, David. The History Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Paul. Dismembering the Body Politic: Partisan Politics in England’s Towns, 1650–1730. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handlin, Oscar and Handlin, Mary F.. “Origins of the American Business Corporation.” Journal of Economic History 5 (1945): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Farhat. “Indigenous Cooperation and the Birth of a Colonial City: Calcutta, c. 1698–1750.” Modern Asian Studies 26:1 (1992): 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindle, Steve. The State and Social Change in Early Modern England, 1550–1640. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, or The Matter, Forme, and Power of a Common Wealth, Ecclesiastical and Civil. London, 1651.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by Richard Tuck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Hobbes On the Citizen, Edited by Richard Tuck and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hont, Istvan. Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-state in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Jessen, Mathias Hein. “The State of the Company: Corporations, Colonies and Companies in Leviathan.” Journal of Intellectual History and Political Thought 1 (2012): 56–85.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst H. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Jason “Corporate Law and the Sovereignty of States.” American Sociological Review 73 (2008): 402–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupperman, Karen. Providence Island, 1630–1641: The Other Puritan Colony. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, E. “Merchant Guilds in Hamburg and Konigsberg: a Comparative Study of Urban Institutions and Economic Development in the Early-Modern Period.” Journal of European Economic History 39:1 (2010): 33–65.Google Scholar
MacMillan, Ken. The Atlantic Imperial Constitution: Center and Periphery in the English Atlantic World. New York: Palgrave, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, F. W. “Introduction.” In Political Theories of the Middle Age, by Otto von Gierke, trans. F. W. Maitland, p. vii–xlvi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1913.Google Scholar
Maitland, F. W. Maitland: State, Trust and Corporation. Edited by David Runciman and Magnus Ryan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, F. W. “The Crown as Corporation.” In Maitland: State, Trust and Corporation, edited by David Runciman and Magnus Ryan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, Noel. “Hobbes, Sandys, and the Virginia Company.” Aspects of Hobbes, edited by Noel Malcolm, 53–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mentz, Soren. The English Gentleman Merchant at Work: Madras and the City of London, 1660–1740. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Neuhauser, Paul M. “Privy Council Regulation of Trade Under James I.” Iowa Law Review 50 (1964–65): 1032–1071.Google Scholar
Nierstrasz, Chris. In the Shadow of the Company: the Dutch East India Company and its servants in the period of its decline (1740–1796). Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Ogborn, Miles. Global lives: Britain and the world, 1550–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Orr, D. Alan. “A Prospectus for a ‘New’ Constitutional History of Early Modern England.” Albion 36:3 (2004): 430–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormrod, David. The Rise of Commercial Empires. England and the Netherlands in the Age of Mercantilism, 1650–1770. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Orts, Eric W. Business Persons: A Legal Theory of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papillon, Thomas. The East-India-Trade a most Profitable Trade to the Kingdom. And Best Secured and Improved in a Company, and a Joint-Stock. London, 1677.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, William A. Freedom’s Debt: The Royal African Company and the Politics of the Atlantic Slave Trade. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, William A and Van Cleve, George W.. “Parting Companies: The Glorious Revolution, Company Power, and Imperial Mercantilism.” Historical Journal 57:3 (2014): 617–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, William A. and Stein, Tristan. “The Public Rivalry between Regulated and Joint Stock Corporations and the Development Seventeenth-Century Corporate Constitutions.” Historical Research, (forthcoming, 2016).Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. Made with Words: Hobbes on Language, Mind, and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincus, Steven. 1688: The First Modern Revolution.. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Ramsay, G. D. The City of London in international politics at the accession of Elizabeth Tudor. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Ramsay, G. D. “Clothworkers, Merchant Adventurers, and Richard Hakluyt.” English Historical Review 92 (1977): 504–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, G. D. The Queen’s Merchants and the Revolt of the Netherlands. The End of the Antwerp Mart, vol. 2. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Reasons humbly offered against grafting or splicing and for dissolving this present East-India Company. London, 1690.Google Scholar
Reasons humbly offered against establishing, by Act of Parliament, the East-India-trade, in a company, with a joint-stock, exclusive of others, the subjects of England. London, 1693.Google Scholar
Renton, Alexander, ed. The English Reports, 178 vols. London: Stevens & Sons, 1900–1932.Google Scholar
Some Considerations Humbly Offered, against Granting the Sole Trade to Guiny from Cape Blanco to Cape Lopez, to a Company with a Joint Stock, exclusive of others. London, 1693. Robins, Nick. The Corporation that Changed the World: How the East India Company Shaped the Modern Multinational. 2nd edition. London: Pluto Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Runciman, David. “Debate: What Kind of Person is Hobbes’s State: A Reply to Skinner.” Journal of Political Philosophy 8:2 (2000): 268–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Sudipta. Empire of Free Trade: The East India Company and the Making of the Colonial Marketplace. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Siepp, David. “Formalism and realism in fifteenth-century English law: Bodies corporate and bodies natural.” In Judges and Judging in the History of the Common Law and Civil Law: From Antiquity to Modern Times, edited by Paul Brand and Joshua Getzler, 37–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Q. “The State.” In Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, edited by Terence Ball, James Farr and Russell Hanson, 90–131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. “Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State.” Journal of Political Philosophy 7:1 (1999): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Q. “A Genealogy of the Modern State.” Proceedings of the British Academy 162 (2009): 325–370.Google Scholar
Springborg, Patricia. “Hobbes, Donne and the Virginia Company: Terra Nullius and ‘The Bulimia of Dominion.’” History of Political Thought 36 (2015): 113–164.Google Scholar
Stein, Tristan. “Tangier in the Restoration Empire.” The Historical Journal 54:4 (2011): 985–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Tristan. “The Mediterranean and the English Empire of Trade, 1660–1748.” Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, 2012.Google Scholar
Stern, Philip J. “‘A Politie of Civill & Military Power’: Political Thought and the Late Seventeenth-Century Foundations of the East India Company-State.” Journal of British Studies 47 (2008): 263–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Philip J. The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of English Empire in India. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, Anne F. “The Merchant Adventurers of England: their origins and the Mercers’ Company of London.” Historical Research 75:1 (2002): 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“‘Proclamation by Charles I in Regard to Virginia,’ 13 May 1625.” The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 7 (1899), 129–136.Google Scholar
Thomson, Janice. Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-Building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. The Idea of Natural Rights. Atlanta: American Scholars Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. Foundations of the Conciliar Theory: The Contribution of the Medieval Canonists from Gratin to the Great Schism. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. “Corporatism, Individualism, and Consent: Locke and Premodern Thought.” In Law as Profession and Practice in Medieval Europe: Essays in Honor of James A. Brundage, edited by Kenneth Pennington and Melodie Harris Eichbauer, 49–72. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011.Google Scholar
Travers, Robert. Ideology and Empire in Eighteenth-Century India: The British in Bengal. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James. Public Philosophy in a New Key, vol. 2, Imperialism and Civic Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Tully, James. On Global Citizenship: James Tully in Dialogue. New York: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar
Weststeijn, Arthur. “The VOC as a Company-State: Debating Seventeenth-Century Dutch Colonial Expansion.” Itinerario 38:1 (2014): 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, William. Systema Africanum… London, 1690.Google Scholar
Willan, Thomas Stuart. The Early History of the Russia Company, 1553–1603. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Winship, Michael. Godly Republicanism: Puritans, Pilgrims, and a City on a Hill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Steven. A Clearing in the Forest: Law, Life, and Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Withington, Philip. The Politics of Commonwealth: Citizens and Freemen in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withington, Philip. “Public Discourse, Corporate Citizenship, and State Formation in Early Modern England.” American Historical Review 112:4 (2007): 1016–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withington, Philip. Society in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.Google Scholar