Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:58:33.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Links with Ayutthaya: Changes in Networks between Japan, China, and Siam in the Early Modern Period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2014

Ryuto Shimada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ayutthaya was a key transit port and a centre for the intra-Asian maritime trade in the early modern period. Consequently, Siam's international trade must have been transformed once the maritime trade in Asia changed on a large scale. This essay aims to offer a systematic picture of the changing trend in the maritime trade in the China Sea region, with particular emphasis on Ayutthaya's trade with Japan and China. To this end, the transition of the Siamese trade will be examined from the point of view of regional trade patterns and how these changed from the mid-seventeenth century to the end of the eighteenth century.

This essay has two general purposes. First, it provides a multinational perspective for a comparative study of Japan and China's foreign trade. The second is to use this case study of the Siamese trade to examine the hypothesis posed by Leonard Blussé that the eighteenth century should be regarded as a “Chinese century.”

Keeping these aims in mind, I shall analyse the Siamese trade with Japan and China in the long run and after detailed investigation, propose a model for the triangular trade between Japan, China, and Siam.

Type
Managing Trade Flows
Information
Itinerario , Volume 37 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Canton and Nagasaki Compared , December 2013 , pp. 92 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blussé, Leonard. “Chinese Century: The Eighteenth Century in the China Sea Region.” Archipel 58 (1999): 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, Jennifer Wayne. Fields from the Sea: Chinese Junk Trade with Siam during the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries. Ithaca: Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iioka, Naoko. “Ayutaya Kokuō no Tainichi Bōeki: Sakokuka no Nagasaki ni Raikōshita Shamusen no Tokō Keiro no Kentō” (The trade with Japan by the Ayutthaya kings: a study on the navigation routes of Siamese ships for the Nagasaki in the period of national seclusion), Nanpō Bunka 24 (1997): 65–100.Google Scholar
Iwao, Seiichi. “Kinsei Nisshi Bōeki ni kansuru Sūryōteki Kōsatsu” (A study on the Chinese trade with Japan in the XVIIth century: chiefly on their volume and quantity). Shigaku Zasshi 62:11 (1953): 1–40.Google Scholar
Lapian, Adrian B. “Power Politics in Southeast Asian Waters.” In From Japan to Arabia: Ayutthaya's Maritime Relations with Asia, edited by Breazeale, Kennon, 137–49. Bangkok: The Foundation for the Promotion of Social Sciences and Humanities Textbooks Project, 1999.Google Scholar
Liu, Shiuh-Feng. “Kyōhō Nenkan no Tōsen Bōeki to Nihondō” (The Chinese trade and Japanese copper in the years of Kyoho). In Sakoku to Kokusai Kankei (National seclusion and international relations), edited by Nakamura, Tadashi, 296–326. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1997.Google Scholar
Mitsui, Rokuro, and Doi, Shinichiro. Shin Nagasaki Nenpyō (New Nagasaki chronicle). Nagasaki: Nagasaki Bunkensha, 1974.Google Scholar
Nagazumi, Yoko. Tōsen Yushutsunyū Sūryō Ichiran 1637–1833 (Chinese junks cargo list, 1637–1833). Tokyo: Sōbunsha, 1987.Google Scholar
Raben, Remco. “Ayutthaya, King Phetracha and the World: Dynamics of Kingship and Trade in Late Seventeenth-century Ayutthaya.” In Proceedings of the International Symposium “Crossroads of Thai and Dutch History,” edited by na Pombejra, Dhiravat, et al., 199–232. Bangkok: Seameo-Spafa, 2007.Google Scholar
Shimada, Ryuto. The Intra-Asian Trade in Japanese Copper by the Dutch East India Company during the Eighteenth Century. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimada, Ryuto. “Kinsei Nihon no Shamu Bōekishi Kenkyū Josetsu: 18 Seiki niokeru Ajiakan Bōeki Kōzō no Henka” (A new approach on the Siamese trade with early modern Japan: structural change in intra-Asian trade during the eighteenth century). Seinan Gakuin Daigaku Keizaigaku Ronshū 41:2 (2006): 73–100.Google Scholar
Shimada, Ryuto. “Siamese Products in the Japanese Market during the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” In Large and Broad: The Dutch Impact on Early Modern Asia: Essays in Honor of Leonard Blussé, edited by Nagazumi, Yoko, 147–65. Tokyo: The Toyo Bunko, 2010.Google Scholar
Smith, George Vinal. The Dutch in Seventeenth-Century Thailand. De Kalb: Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Illinois University, 1977.Google Scholar
Takasaki, Misako. “18 Seiki ni okeru Sin Tai Koshoshi: Syamumai Bōeki no Kōsatsu o chūshin toshite” (Qing-Thai relations in the eighteenth century: a study on the Siamese rice trade). Ochanomizu Shigaku 10 (1967): 18–32.Google Scholar
Yao, Keisuke. Kinsei Oranda Bōeki to Sakoku (The Dutch trade and national seclusion in early modern Japan). Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1998.Google Scholar
Yao, Keisuke. 18,19 seiki Dejima Oranda Shōkan no Kisoteki Kenkyu (Basic research of the Dutch trading post in the Deshima Island during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries). Kagaku Kenkyūhi Hōkokusho (Report of the Research supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science). Kitakyushu: The University of Kitakyushu, 2000.Google Scholar