Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:30:40.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Conversation: Revisiting Publics and Counterpublics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2020

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Conversation
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Research Institute for History, Leiden University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

On 31 March 2017, the Yale MacMillan Center hosted a roundtable discussion between Karin Barber (University of Birmingham), Lara Putnam (University of Pittsburgh), and Michael Warner (Yale University), chaired by Leslie James.

References

Bakhtin, Mikhail. “The Problem of Speech Genres.” In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, 6299. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig, ed. Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Goodman, Bryna. “Networks of News: Power, Language and Transnational Dimensions of the Chinese Press, 1850–1949.” China Review 4:1 (2004), 110.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Newell, Stephanie. The Power to Name: A History of Anonymity in Colonial West Africa. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Wagner, Rudolf G. “Asymmetry in Transcultural Interaction.” In Engaging Transculturality: Concepts, Key Terms, Case Studies, edited by Abu-Er-Rub, Laila et al. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Walker, David. Appeal to the Coloured Citizens of the World. https://docsouth.unc.edu/nc/walker/walker.htmlGoogle Scholar
Warner, Michael. “Publics and Counterpublics.” Public Culture 14:1 (Winter 2002), 4990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar