Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T22:34:51.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Colonial Agro-Industrialism to Agro-Industrialism: game changing evolution of the Dutch transoceanic cinchona-quinine enterprise (1940s–1960s)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2016

Arjo Roersch van der Hoogte  and
Toine Pieters
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By the turn of the twentieth century, the Dutch colony of the Netherlands Indies dominated the worldwide supply of antifebrifuge (to reduce fever) cinchona bark, the raw material for quinine, an antimalarial medicine. Over the next four decades, the high-quality and laboratory-conditioned cultivation of cinchona became the backbone of a Dutch transoceanic cinchona-quinine enterprise that dominated the international quinine markets. However, in the two decades after the Second World War, the Netherlands Indies’ cinchona bark dominance ended, and the Dutch transoceanic cinchona-quinine production and trade network collapsed. How can we explain this shift? In this study, we argue that this change was part of a process of globalization of cinchona bark production that created new sources and transoceanic production and distribution chains and hence new networks of control that were increasingly less associated with a specific nation than with multinational companies. Colonial networks of control were replaced by new industrial networks of control, and the colonial agro-industrial system was reconfigured into a global agro-industrial system. At the same time, this study also shows that the economic decolonization of Indonesia forced a process of deglobalization that resulted in a translocation of the cinchona-quinine trade networks. As such, this study shows a mix of globalization and deglobalization happening in tandem with Indonesian decolonization and agricultural globalization.

Keywords

Cinchona-quinineIndonesiapharmaceutical industryagro-industrialismglobalizationdecolonization
Type
Articles
Information
Itinerario , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , April 2016 , pp. 105 - 125
Copyright
© 2016 Research Institute for History, Leiden University 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Arjo Roersch van der Hoogte has obtained his PhD at the Utrecht University and is an independent researcher. Toine Pieters is director of the Freudenthal Institute for Science and Mathematics Education of Utrecht University. The authors would like to thank Hieke Huistra and Harro Maat for their useful feedback and ideas. They also thank Julia Challinor for her English manuscript correction services.

References

Archival Sources

KITLV = Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, Leiden:Google Scholar
KITLV Collectie Kerbosch & Kinacultuur.Google Scholar
NA = National Archive, The Hague:Google Scholar
NA NHM = Archives of the Nederlandse Handel Maatschappij, the Netherlands Trading Association.Google Scholar
NA Londens Archief = Archives of the Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken te Londen, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in London.Google Scholar
NA Code Archief = Archives of the Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken: Code Archief 1955-1964, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Code Archief 1955-1964.Google Scholar
LUB = Leiden University Library, Leiden:Google Scholar
LUB KIT= Colonial Collection.Google Scholar

Bibliographical Sources

Baggen, Peter, Faber, Jasper and Homburg, Ernst. “The Rise of a Knowledge Society.” In Technology and the Making of the Netherlands: The Age of Contested Modernization, 1890-1970, ed. Johan Schot, Harry Lintsen and Arie Rip, 253–323. Zutphen: Walburg Pers, 2010.Google Scholar
Bogaerts, Els and Raben, Remco, eds. Van Indië tot Indonesië. Amsterdam: Boon, 2007.Google Scholar
Bon, Jan en Jaap Snel. De Kininefabriek: 1904–2002. Rotterdam: DSM Minera, 2002.Google Scholar
Busch, Lawrence and Juska, Arunas. “Beyond Political Economy: Actor Networks and the Globalization of agriculture.” Review of International Political Economy 4:4 (1997): 688–708.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Shaping the Industrial Century: The Remarkable Story of the Modern Chemical and Pharmaceutical Industries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Cuvi, Nicolás. “The Cinchona Prorgam (1940–1945): Science and Imperialism in the Exploitation of a Medicinal Plant.” Dynamis 31:1 (2011): 183–206.Google Scholar
Daniel, Pete. Breaking the Land: The Transformation of Cotton, Tobacco, and Rice Cultures since 1880. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Doel, W. van den. Afscheid van Indië: De val van het Nederlandse imperium in Azië. Amsterdam: Prometheus, 2000.Google Scholar
Faber, Jasper. Kennisverwerving in de Nederlandse industrie 1870–1970. Amsterdam: Aksant, 2001.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Deborah. “Beyond Tractors: The History of Technology in American Agriculture.” Technology and Culture 32:1 (Jan. 1991): 114–126.Google Scholar
Gold, Harry. Quinidine in Disorders of the Heart. New York: Paul B. Hoeber, 1950.Google Scholar
Goss, Andrew. The Floracrats: State-Sponsored Science and the Failure of the Enlightenment in Indonesia. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Greene, Jeremy A. Prescribing by Numbers: Drugs and the Definition of Disease. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Heuschen, J. H. H. “Maarssen en de Nederlandsche Kininefabriek NKF (1905–1967).” Historische Kring Maarssen 25:2 (1998): 32–48.Google Scholar
Homburg, E., van Selm, A. J. and Vincken, P. F. G.. “Industrialisatie en industriecomplexen: de chemische industrie tussen overheid, technologie en markt.” In Techniek in Nederland in de twintigste eeuw II. Delfstoffen, energie en chemie, edited by J. W. Schot, 376–401. Zutphen: Walburg Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Homburg, E. and Rip, A.. “De chemische industrie in de twintigste eeuw.” In Techniek in Nederland in de twintigste eeuw II. Delfstoffen, energie en chemie, edited by J. W. Schot, 403–407. Zutphen: Walburg Pers, 2000.Google Scholar
Jones, Geoffrey. “Multinational Strategies and Developing Countries in Historical Perspective.” Harvard Business School Working Paper 10-076 (2010).Google Scholar
Jong, H. W. de and de Lange, R.. A Study of the Evolution of Concentration in the Pharmaceutical Industry in the Netherlands. Studies: Evolution of Concentration and Competition Series. EU Commission, 1975.Google Scholar
Li, Jie Jack. Blockbuster Drugs: The Rise and Decline of the Pharmaceutical Industry. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Lindblad, J. Thomas. Bridges to New Business: The Economic Decolonization of Indonesia. Leiden: KITLV Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Lindblad, J. Thomas. “Economic Growth and Decolonisation in Indonesia.” Itinerario 34:1 (2010): 97–112.Google Scholar
Lindblad, Thomas J. and Post, Peter, eds. Indonesian Economic Decolonization in Regional and International Perspective. Leiden: KITLV Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Reynders, Lucas and Winden, Frans van. De Farmaceutische Industrie in Nederland. Amsterdam: SUA, 1976.Google Scholar
Rocco, Fiammetta. The Miraculous Fever-tree: Malaria, Medicine and the Cure that Changed the World. London: HarperCollins, 2003.Google Scholar
Roersch van der Hoogte, Arjo and Pieters, Toine. “From Javanese Coca to Java Coca: An Exemplary Product of Dutch Colonial Agro-industrialism, 1880–1920.” Technology and Culture 54 (2013): 90–116.Google Scholar
Roersch van der Hoogte, Arjo and Pieters, Toine “Science in Service of Colonial Agro-industrialism: The Case of Cinchona Cultivation in the Dutch and British East Indies, 1852–1900.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47 (2014): 12–22.Google Scholar
Roersch van der Hoogte, Arjo and Pieters, Toine “Quinine, Malaria, and the Cinchona Bureau: Marketing Practices and Knowledge Circulation in a Dutch Transoceanic Cinchona-Quinine Enterprise (1920s–30s).” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 2015 Jun 7, pii: jrv009. [Epub ahead of print.].Google Scholar
Roersch van der Hoogte, Arjo and Pieters, Toine “Science, Industry and the Colonial State: A Shift from a German- to a Dutch-controlled Cinchona and Quinine Cartel (1880–1920).” History and Technology: An International Journal 31:1 (2015): 2–36; Published online 6 August 2015.Google Scholar
Rosengarten, Frederic Jr. History of the Cinchona Project of Merck & Co., Inc. and Experimental Plantations, Inc., 1933–1943. Rahway, N.J.: Merck & Co., 1944.Google Scholar
Sluyterman, Keetie E. Dutch Enterprise in the Twentieth Century: Business Strategies in a Small Open Economy. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Streller, Sabine and Roth, Klaus. “Eine Rinde erobert die Welt: Von der Apotheke an die Bar.” Chemie in Unserer Zeit 46:4 (2012): 228–247.Google Scholar
Temin, Peter. “Technology, Regulation, and Market Structure in the Modern Pharmaceutical Industry.” Bell Journal of Economics 10:2 (Autumn 1979): 429–446.Google Scholar
Wie, Thee Kian. “Indonesianization: Economic Aspects of Decolonization in Indonesia in the 1950s.” In Indonesian Economic Decolonization in Regional and International Perspective, edited by J. Thomas Lindblad and Peter Post, 19–38. Leiden: KITLV Press, 2009.Google Scholar
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly. Prices of Quinine and Quinidine. Hearings, Eighty-ninth Congress, second session, pursuant to S. Res. 191, and Ninetieth Congress, first session, pursuant to S. Res. 26. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966–67.Google Scholar
Vermij, Rienk. “Scale Increase and Its Dynamic.” In Technology and the Making of the Netherlands: The Age of Contested Modernization, 1890–1970, edited by Johan Schot, Harry Lintsen and Arie Rip, 179–251. Zutphen: Walburg Pers, 2010.Google Scholar
Webb, James L. A. Jr. Humanity’s Burden: A Global History of Malaria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Woods, Michael. “Engaging the Global Countryside: Globalization, Hybridity and the Reconstitution of Rural Place.” Progress in Human Geography 31:4 (2007): 485–507.Google Scholar
Zwaag, Jaap van der. Verloren Tropische Zaken. De opkomst en ondergang van de Nederlandse handel- & cultuurmaatschappijen in het voormalige Nederlands-Indië. Meppel: De Feniks Pers, 1991.Google Scholar