Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-16T20:33:15.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Arguing with the Heathens: The Further Reformation and the Ethnohistory of Johannes Hoornbeeck (1617–1666)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2015

Jos Gommans  and
Ineke Loots
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Johannes Hoornbeeck (1617–1666) was a Dutch Protestant theologian, generally regarded as a member of the so-called Further Reformation in the Netherlands. He wrote a number of theological works in Latin and in Dutch. Most of his works have a polemical character, defending his orthodox protestant stance against a variety of heretical views. In De conversione Indorum et gentilium, based on disputations with students and published posthumously, he enters into a discussion with the ‘heathens’. To this end he carefully combines biblical and classical scholarship and also reflects on the latest ethnographical information collected by both Protestant and Catholic travellers and missionaries. The book is characterised by great erudition and by an openness for other people’s opinions that necessitates the constant appraisal of one’s own point of view. We argue that such an open engagement with heretical views ultimately carries the danger of a sceptical view of one’s own religion.

Keywords

HoornbeeckFurther ReformationMissionRadical EnlightenmentWorld History
Type
Articles
Information
Itinerario , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , April 2015 , pp. 45 - 68
Copyright
© 2015 Research Institute for History, Leiden University 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Jos Gommans is Professor of Colonial and Global History at Leiden University; Ineke Loots is an independent scholar. The gist of this of this article was delivered as a lecture at the European Institute in Florence. We would like to thank a very stimulating audience, in particular Jorge Flores, Regina Grafe and Ann Thomson. We are also grateful to professors Hans van de Ven (Cambridge) and Wim Boot (Leiden) for sharing their thoughts with us on respectively the Chinese and Japanese sections of De conversione. The same goes for an anonymous referee for some critical but fruitful comments.

References

Alam, Muzaffar. “Strategy and Imagination in a Mughal Sufi Story of Creation.” Indian Economic and Social History Review 49 (2012): 151–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asselt, W. J. “De Islam in de beoordeling van Johannes Coccejus en Gisbertus Voetius.” Kerk en Theologie 46 (1995): 229–251.Google Scholar
Boone, A. Th. “Zending en gereformeerd piëtisme in Nederland: Een historisch overzicht.” Documentatieblad Nadere Reformatie 14 (1990): 1–31.Google Scholar
Brienen, T., Groenendijk, L. F., op’t Hof, W.J. and Meeuse, C.J.. “Nadere Reformatie, een poging tot begripsbepaling.” Documentatieblad Nadere Reformatie 7 (1983): 109–116.Google Scholar
Brienen, T.. Johannes Hoornbeeck (1617–1666): Eminent geleerde en pastoraal theoloog. Kampen: De Groot Goudriaan, 2008.Google Scholar
Broeyer, F. G. M. “Theological Education at the Dutch Universities in the Seventeenth Century: Four Professors on their Ideal of the Curriculum.” Dutch Review of Church History 85 (2005): 390–408.Google Scholar
Dirks, Nicholas B.The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Dülberg, Franz. Frans Hals. Ein Leben und ein Werk. Stuttgart: P. Neff, 1930.Google Scholar
Gommans, Jos and Loots, Ineke. “Johannes Hoornbeecks etno-historische methode en de Nieuwe Wereld.” In Reizen door het maritieme verleden van Nederland: Maritiem-historische opstellen aangeboden aan Henk J. den Heijer bij zijn afscheid als hoogleraar zeegeschiedenis aan de Universiteit Leiden, edited by Anita van Dissel, Maurits Ebben and Karwan Fatah-Black, 189–203. Zutphen: Walburg Pers, 2015.Google Scholar
Goor, Jurrien van. Jan Kompenie as Schoolmaster: Dutch Education in Ceylon 1690–1795. Utrecht: Historische Studies, 1978.Google Scholar
Graafland, C., op’t Hof, W. J. and van Lieburg, F. A.. “Nadere Reformatie: Opnieuw een poging tot begripsbepaling.” Documentatieblad Nadere Reformatie 19 (1995): 105–184.Google Scholar
de Groot, A.Biografisch lexicon voor de geschiedenis van het Nederlands protestantisme, vol. 1, edited by D. Nauta et al. Kampen: Kok, 1978.Google Scholar
Hazard, Paul. The European Mind 1680–1715, trans. J. May. London: Harmondsworth, 1964.Google Scholar
Heurnius, Justus. De legatione evangelica ad Indos capessenda adminitio. Leiden, 1618.Google Scholar
Hodgen, Margaret T. Early Anthropology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmeyr, J. W.Johannes Hoornbeeck as Polemikus. Kampen: Kok, 1975.Google Scholar
Hoornbeeck, Johannes. De conversione Indorum et gentilium. Utrecht, 1669.Google Scholar
Hoornbeeck, Johannes. Euthansia ofte welsterven. Utrecht, 1651.Google Scholar
Hoornbeeck, Johannes. Heyliging van Gods name ende dagh. Utrecht, 1651.Google Scholar
Hoornbeeck, Johannes. Korte ende naardere verdediging van de waare kerck gestelt tegen de wyser van de Paapsche kerck. Utrecht, 1649.Google Scholar
Hoornbeeck, Johannes. Sondagh rustdagh. Leiden, 1659.Google Scholar
Hoornbeeck, Johannes. Summa controversiarum religionis. Utrecht, 1653.Google Scholar
Hoornbeeck, Johannes. Socianianismi confutati tomus primus. Utrecht, 1650.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn, Jacob, Margaret C. and Mijnhardt, Wijnand. The Book that changed Europe: Picart & Bernard’s Religious Ceremonies of the World. Cambridge Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Jonathan I.Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Jonathan I.. The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall, 1477–1806. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joosse, L. J. “Kerk en zendingsbevel.” In Het Indisch Sion: De Gereformeerde kerk onder de Verenigde Indische Compagnie, edited by G. J. Schutte, 25–43. Hilversum: Verloren, 2002.Google Scholar
Kors, Alan Charles. Atheism in France, 1650–1729, vol. 1, The Orthodox Sources of Disbelief. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krop, Henri. “Hornius, Georgius (1620–70).” In The Dictionary of Seventeenth and Eighteenth-century Dutch Philosophers, vol. 1, edited by Wiep van Bunge et al., 449–454. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Levitin, Dmitri. “From Sacred History to the History of Religion: Paganism, Judaism, and Christianity in European Historiography from Reformation to ‘Enlightenment,’” The Historical Journal 55:4 (2012): 1117–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieburg, Fred van. “Wege der niederländischen Pietismusforschung. Traditionsaneignung, Identitätspolitik und Erinnerungskultur,” Pietismus und Neuzeit 37 (2011): 211–253.Google Scholar
Linde, S. van der. “Het opkomen en de eerste uitwerking van de zendingsgedachten binnen het Nederlandse Gereformeerde Protestantisme.” In Opgang en voortgang der Reformatie. Een keuze uit lezingen en artikelen van S. van der Linde, 201–216. Amsterdam: Bolland, 1976.Google Scholar
Miller, Peter N. “Taking Paganism Seriously: Anthropology and Antiquarianism in Early Seventeenth-Century Histories of Religion.” Archiv für Religionsgeschichte, 3 (2001): 183–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitter, Partha. Much Maligned Monsters: A History of European Reactions to Indian Art. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1992, Century. In Historia: Empiricism and Erudition in Early Modern Europe, edited by Giana Pomata and Nancy G. Siraisi, 181–209. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Mulsow, Martin. “Antiquarianism and Idolatry: The Historia of Religions in the Seventeenth Century.” In Historia: Empiricism and Erudition in Early Modern Europe, edited by Giana Pomata and Nancy G. Siraisi, 181–209. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulsow, Martin. “Idolatry and Science: Against Nature Worship from Boyle to Rüdiger, 1680–1720.” Journal of the History of Ideas 67:4 (2006): 697–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemeijer, H. E. “Orang Nasrani. Protestants Ambon in de zeventiende eeuw.” In Het Indisch Sion: De Gereformeerde kerk onder de Verenigde Indische Compagnie, edited by G. J. Schutte, 127–146. Hilversum: Verloren, 2002.Google Scholar
Noak, Bettina. “Kennistransfer en culturele differentie: Abraham Rogerius en zijn Open deure tot het verborgen heydendom (1651).” Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 128(2012): 350–364.Google Scholar
Oosterom, B. “Johannes Hoornbeeck als zendingstheoloog en oecumenicus: Bijdrage tot het onderzoek naar de zendingsgedachten in de Nadere Reformatie.” Unpublished Master-thesis Utrecht University, 1969.Google Scholar
Oosterom, B. “Johannes Hoornbeeck als zendingstheoloog.” Theologia Reformata 13 (1970): 81–98.Google Scholar
Otterspeer, Willem. Groepsportret met dame, vol. 1, Het bolwerk van de vrijheid. De Leidse universiteit, 1575–1672. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker, 2000.Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony. The Fall of Natural Man: The American Indian and the Origins of Comparative Ethnology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. The Third Force in Seventeenth-century Thought. Leiden: Brill, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridderus, Franciscus. De beschaemde christen, door het geloof en leven van heydenen en andere natuerlijcke mensen. Rotterdam, 1670.Google Scholar
Ridderus, Franciscus. Nuttige tyd-korter voor reysende en andere lieden. Rotterdam, 1663.Google Scholar
Rubiés, Joan-Pau. Travel and Ethnology in the Renaissance: South India through European Eyes, 1250–1625. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubiés, Joan-Pau. “Theology, Ethnography, and the Historicization of Idolatry.” Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (2006): 571–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubiés, Joan-Pau. “Hugo Grotius’s Dissertation on the Origins of the American Peoples and the Use of the Compararive Method.” Journal of the History of Ideas 52 (1991): 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Jonathan. “Sacred and Profane: Idolatry, Antiquarianism and the Polemics of Distinction in the Seventeenth Century.” Past and Present 192 (2006): 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, S. Frederick. Lost Enlightenment: Central Asia’s Golden Age from Arab Conquest to Tamerlane. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolte, Carolien. Philip Angel’s Deex-Autaers: Vaisnava Mythology from Manuscript to Book Market in the Context of the Dutch East India Company, c. 1600–1672. Delhi: Manohar, 2011.Google Scholar
Svensson, Manfred. “Fundamental Doctrines of the Faith, Fundamental Doctrines of Society: Seventeenth-Century Doctrinal Minimalism.” The Journal of Religion 94 (2014): 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanis, James. “Reformed Pietism and Protestant Missions.” The Harvard Theological Review 67 (1974): 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teellinck, Willem. Davids danckbaerheyt voor gods weldadigheyt. Amsterdam, 1624.Google Scholar
Udemans, Godefridus C. ‘t Geestelijkck roer van het coopmans schip. Dordrecht, 1640.Google Scholar
Voetius, Gisbertus. “De missionibus ecclesiasticis.” In Politicae ecclesiasticae pars tertia et ultima, 322–348. Utrecht, 1676.Google Scholar
Voetius, Gisbertus. “De plantatoribus ecclesiarum” (disputation held in 1652, edited in 1653). In Selectarum disputationum theologicarum pars secunda, 552–573. Utrecht, 1655.Google Scholar
Voetius, Gisbertus. “De gentilismo et vocatione gentium” (disputation held in 1638). In Selectarum disputationum theologicarum pars secunda, 579–651. Utrecht, 1655.Google Scholar
Vossius, Isaac. Dissertatio de vera aetate mundi. The Hague, 1659.Google Scholar
Wall, Ernestine van der. Religie en Verlichting: Een veelzijdige verstandhouding.” In Een veelzijdige verstandhouding: Religie en Verlichting in Nederland 1650–1850, edited by Ernestine van der Wall and Leo Wessels, 13–35. Nijmegen: Vantilt, 2008.Google Scholar
Ypma, J. “Johannes Hoornbeeck als Missionstheoretiker.” PhD thesis, Gregorian University, Rome, 1958.Google Scholar