Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T22:11:40.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LO STATO IN PROSPETTIVA STORICA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2016

Samuel E. Finer
Get access

Introduzione

Nonostante l'opinione dei revisionisti, dal mio punto di vista l'Impero romano d'Occidente é veramente crollato; i secoli bui del Medio Evo sono stati veramente bui e i regna che da questo periodo sono faticosamente emersi non erano «stati» nel senso che noi oggi diamo a questo termine. Dopo la caduta dell'Impero romano dovevano passare un migliaio di anni prima che apparisse il «moderno stato europeo». Vorrei sottolineare come, contrariamente a quanto molti ritengono, l'Europa non abbia ‘inventato’ lo Stato. L'Europa lo ha reinventato dopo un lungo periodo in cui al crollo era seguita una condizione di quasi anarchia e successivamente il feudalesimo.

Type
Saggi
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , April 1990 , pp. 3 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Bettenson, Q. (1943), Documents of the Christian Church, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bodde, D. e Morris, C. (1967), Law in Imperial China, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
de Jouvenal, B. (1957), Sovereignty, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Finer, S.E. (a cura di) (1963), E.J. Sieyés. What is the Third Estate?, London, Pall Mall.Google Scholar
Hall, J. e Jansen, M. (1968), Studies in the Institutional History of Modern Japan, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, D.F. (1968), The Evolution of Tokugawa Law , in Hall, J.W. e Jansen, M.B. (a cura di) Studies in the Institutional History of Early Modern Japan, Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 203–229.Google Scholar
Henderson, I. (1965), Conciliation and Japanese Law. Google Scholar
Hulsewé, A.F.P. (1955), Remnants of Han Law, vol. I, Leiden, Brill.Google Scholar
Jolliffe, J.E.A. (1937), The Constitutional History of Medieval England. Google Scholar
Johnson, W. (1979), The T'ang Code: Vol. I. The General Principles, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kedourie, E. (1989), Crisis and Revolution in Modern Islam , «Times Literary Supplement», 19–25 maggio 1989.Google Scholar
Mousnier, R.C. (1979), The Institutions of France, 1598-1789, Chicago, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Neale, J.E. (1963), The Age of Catherine de Medici, Cape.Google Scholar
Ping, Ching e Bloodworth, D. (1976), The Chinese Machiavelli, New York, Secher and Warburg.Google Scholar
Schacht, J. (1982), An Introduction to Islamic Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Southern, R.W. (1970), Western Society and the Church in the Middle Ages, Harmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar
Streeet, H. (1953), Governmental Liability, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Sprinkel, S. (1962), Legal Institutions in Manchu China. Google Scholar
Walker, R.L. (1953), The Multi-State System of Ancient China, Hamden, Shoestring.Google Scholar
Watt, W.M. (1968), Islamic Political Thought, Edimburgh, Edimburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978), Economy and Society, Los Angeles, University of California Press.Google Scholar