Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:49:56.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CRISI ECONOMICA, ISTITUZIONI E RENDIMENTO IN 17 DEMOCRAZIE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Introduzione

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Alla metà degli anni settanta, la prima di una serie di crisi economiche colpiva le democrazie occidentali, sottoponendo a sfide più o meno severe le loro strutture e le loro capacità politico-istituzionali. Del tema si è occupata un'intera letteratura, che ha fornito ragguardevoli contributi alla conoscenza del contenuto e dell'efficacia delle risposte di singoli paesi o gruppi di paesi e degli adattamenti/mutamenti subiti dalle società e dagli attori interessati. In questo articolo, viene tracciato un bilancio della materia, aggiornato con informazioni e spiegazioni che si estendono fino alla metà degli anni novanta e coprono diciassette paesi.

Summary

Summary

The main topic is how Lijphart's majoritarian and consensus models of democracy have coped with the 1975-1995 economic crisis. Building upon the body of the available literature, the Author discusses several methodological and technical problems involved, proposes a new classification of the countries concerned, and tests it against an extensive battery (six indicators) of macroeconomic data. Contrary to previous findings, the results show that majoritarian regimes score better than the competing model on all relevant variables, including those typically associated with the (socialdemocratic) consensus democracies (i.e., unemployment).

Type
Ricerche
Copyright
Copyright © Societ Italiana di Scienza Politica 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Almond, G. e Powell, G.B. (1978 2), Comparative Politics, Boston, Little Brown.Google Scholar
Bardi, L. (1996), Change in the Italian Party System, in «Italian Politics and Society», n. 46, autunno, pp. 922.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S. e D'Alimonte, R. (1995), Maggioritario ma non troppo, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S. e Mair, P. (1990), Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability. The Stabilization of European Electorates 1885-1985, London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. J. (1991), Review Article: What Is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?, in «British Journal of Political Science», 21, pp. 215233.Google Scholar
Berger, S. (a cura di) (1981), Organizing Interests in Western Europe, London, Cambridge University Press; trad. it., L'organizzazione degli interessi nell'Europa occidentale, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1983.Google Scholar
Blais, A., Blake, D. e Dion, S. (1993), Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies, in «American Journal of Political Science», 37, pp. 4062.Google Scholar
Borrelli, S.A. e Royed, T.J. (1995), Government ‘Strength’ and Budget Deficits in Advanced Democracies, in «European Journal of Political Research», 28, pp. 225260.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J.M. e Tullock, G. (1962), The Calculus of Consent, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Calmfors, L. e Driffill, J. (1988), Bargaining Structure, Corporatism and Macroeconomic Performance, in «Economic Policy», 6, pp. 1461.Google Scholar
Cameron, D.R. (1984), Social Democracy, Corporatism and Labor Quiescence, in Goldthorpe (1984), pp. 143178.Google Scholar
Castles, F.G. (1982), The Impact of Parties on Public Expenditures, in Castles, F.G. (a cura di), The Impact of Parties. Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States, London, Sage, pp. 2196.Google Scholar
Castles, F.G., Lehner, F. e Schmidt, M.G. (a cura di) (1988), Managing Mixed Economies, Berlin, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Castles, F.G. e McKinlay, R.D. (1979), Does Politics Matter: An Analysis of the Public Welfare Commitment in Advanced Democratic States, in «European Journal of Political Research», 7, pp. 169186.Google Scholar
Cawson, A. (1985), Introduction: Varieties of Corporatism. The Importance of Meso-Level Interest Representation, in Cawson, A. (a cura di), Organized Interests and the State, London, Sage, pp. 122.Google Scholar
Colomer, J.M. (1995), Introduzione, in Colomer, J.M. (a cura di), La politica in Europa, Bari, Laterza.Google Scholar
Crepaz, M.M.L. (1992), Corporatism in Decline? An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Corporatism on Macroeconomic Performance and Industrial Disputes in 18 Industrialized Democracies, in «Comparative Political Studies», 25, pp. 139168.Google Scholar
Crepaz, M.M.L. (1996), Constitutional Structure and Regime Performance in 18 Industrialized Democracies: A Test of Olson's Hypothesis, in «European Journal of Political Research», 29, pp. 87104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, C. (1985), Conditions for Trade Union Wage Restraint, in Lindberg, L.N. e Maier, C.S. (a cura di), The Politics of Inflation and Economic Stagnation, Washington, Brookings Institution, pp. 105139.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (1989), Tertium non-Datur: A Comment on the Andrew Shonfield Lectures, in «Government and Opposition», 24, pp. 131141.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Edin, P.A. e Ohlsson, H. (1991), Political Determinants of Budget Deficits: Coalition Effects versus Minority Effects, in «European Economic Review», 35, pp. 15971603.Google Scholar
EJPR (vari anni), Political Data Yearbook, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers. ES (vari anni), National Elections, in «Electoral Studies».Google Scholar
Ferner, A. e Hyman, R. (a cura di) (1992), Industrial Relations in the New Europe, London, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Finer, S.E. (1975), Introduction: Adversary Politics and Electoral Reform, in Finer, S.E. (a cura di), Adversary Politics and Electoral Reform, London, Anthony Wigram.Google Scholar
Gallagher, M., Laver, M. e Mair, P. (1995 2), Representative Government in Modern Europe, New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Garrett, G. e Lange, P. (1989), Government Partisanship and Economic Performance: When and How Does «Who Governs» Matter?, in «Journal of Politics», 51, pp. 676693.Google Scholar
Goldberger, A.S. (1968), Topics in Regression Analysis, New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J.H. (a cura di) (1984), Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gorvin, I. (a cura di) (1989), Elections since 1945: A Worldwide Reference Compendium, Chicago, St. James.Google Scholar
Gualmini, E. (1997), L'evoluzione degli assetti concertativi in Italia e in Germania, in «Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica», 27, pp. 101150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, D.A. Jr. (1977), Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy, in «American Political Science Review», 71, pp. 14671487.Google Scholar
Hicks, A. (1988), Social Democratic Corporatism and Economic Growth, in «Journal of Politics», 50, pp. 677704.Google Scholar
Hicks, A. e Misra, J. (1993), Political Resources and the Growth of Welfare in Affluent Capitalist Democracies, in «American Journal of Sociology», 99, pp. 668710.Google Scholar
Hicks, A. e Patterson, D.W. (1989), On the Robustness of the Left Corporatist Model of Economic Growth, in «Journal of Politics», 51, pp. 662675.Google Scholar
Hicks, A., Swank, D.H. e Ambuhl, M. (1989), Welfare Expansion Revisited: Policy Routines and their Mediation by Parties, Class and Crisis, 1957-1982, in «European Journal of Political Research», 17, pp. 401430.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, J.R. e Streeck, W. (1994), Countries and Sectors. Concluding Remarks on Performance, Convergence, and Competitiveness, in Hollingsworth, J.R., Schmitter, P.C. e Streeck, W. (a cura di), Governing Capitalist Economies. Performance and Control of Economic Sectors, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 270301.Google Scholar
Huber, E., Ragin, C. e Stephens, J.D. (1993), Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and the Welfare State, in «American Journal of Sociology», 99, pp. 711749.Google Scholar
Immergut, E. (1992), The Political Construction of Interests: National Health Insurance Politics in Switzerland, France and Sweden, 1930-1970, London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackman, R.W. (1989), The Politics of Economic Growth, Once Again, in «Journal of Politics», 51, pp. 646661.Google Scholar
Jankowski, R. (1988), Preference Aggregation in Political Parties and Interest Groups: A Synthesis of Corporatist and Encompassing Organization Theory, in «American Journal of Political Science», 32, pp. 105125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, R.S. e Mair, P. (a cura di) (1992), Party Organizations: A Data Handbook, London, Sage.Google Scholar
Crepaz, M.M.L. (1994), How Parties Organize. Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, London, Sage.Google Scholar
Keech, W.R., Bates, R.H. e Lange, P. (1991), Political Economy within Nations, in Crotty, W. (a cura di), Political Science: Looking to the Future, vol. 2, Evanston, Northwestern University Press, pp. 219263.Google Scholar
Keesings Publications (vari anni), Keesings Contemporary Archives, London, Longman.Google Scholar
Keman, H. (1993), The Politics of Managing the Mixed Economy, in Keman, H. (a cura di), Comparative Politics: New Directions in Theory and Method, Amsterdam, VU Press, pp. 161189.Google Scholar
Keman, H., Paloheimo, H. e Whiteley, P. (a cura di) (1987), Coping with the Economic Crisis, London, Sage.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. (1983), The Democratic Class Struggle, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. e Shalev, M. (1979), Strikes, Industrial Relations and Class Conflict in Capitalist Societies, in «British Journal of Sociology», 30, pp. 127171.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. (1994), Les democraties Occidentales, Paris, Economica.Google Scholar
Laakso, M. e Taagepera, R. (1979), Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to Western Europe, in «Comparative Political Studies», 12, pp. 327.Google Scholar
Lange, P. e Meadwell, H. (1991), Typologies of Democratic Systems: From Political Inputs to Political Economy, in Wiarda, H.J. (a cura di), New Directions in Comparative Politics, Boulder, Westview Press, pp. 80112.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, G. (1985), Neo-Corporatism in Western Europe: A Reassessment of the Concept in Cross-National Perspective, relazione al 13° Congresso mondiale dell’ IPSA, 15-19 giugno, Paris, pp. 127.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, G. e Schmitter, P.C. (a cura di) (1982), Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making, London, Sage.Google Scholar
Lehner, F. (1988), The Political Economy of Distributive Conflict, in Castles, Lehner e Schmidt, pp. 5496.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1975), The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research, in «Comparative political Studies», 8, pp. 158177.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1977), Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1984), Democracies. Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, New Haven, Yale University Press; trad. it. Le democrazie contemporanee, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1988.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1991), Constitutional Choices for New Democracies, in «Journal of Democracy», 2, pp. 7284.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1994a), Democracies: Forms, Performance, and Constitutional Engineering, in «European Journal of Political Research», 25, pp. 117.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1994b), Electoral Systems and Party Systems. A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. e Crepaz, M.M.L. (1991), Corporatism and Consensus Democracy in Eighteen Countries: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages, in «British Journal of Political Science», 21, pp. 235246.Google Scholar
Magagna, V. (1988), Representing Efficiency: Corporatism and Democratic Theory, in «Review of Politics», 50, pp. 420444.Google Scholar
Morlino, L. (1998), Democracy between Consolidation and Crisis: Parties, Groups and Citizenship in Southern Europe, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
OECD (1997), Oecd Economic Outlook, n. 61, Paris, Oecd.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (vari anni), Oecd Economic Outlook, Paris, Oecd.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1982), The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities, New Haven, Yale University Press, trad. it. Ascesa e declino delle nazioni, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1986), A Theory of the Incentives Facing Political Organizations: Neo-Corporatism and the Hegemonic State, in «International Political Science Review», 7, pp. 165189.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Y. (1995), Democrazia e referendum, in «Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica», 25, pp. 197226.Google Scholar
Pappalardo, A. (1991), Austerità conservatrice e rigore socialista: Che differenza? I, in «Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica», 21, pp. 3390.Google Scholar
Pappalardo, A. e Mattina, L. (1998), Democrazie e decisioni, Roma, NIS.Google Scholar
Peele, G. (1988), British Conservatism: Ideological Change and Electoral Uncertainty, in Girvin, B. (a cura di), The Transformation of Contemporary Conservatism, London, Sage, pp. 1335.Google Scholar
Pekkarinen, J. (1992), Corporatism and Economic Performance in Sweden, Norway, and Finland, in Pekkarinen, Pohjola, Rowthorn, pp. 298337.Google Scholar
Pekkarinen, J., Pohjola, M. e Rowthorn, B. (a cura di) (1992), Social Corporatism: A Superior Economic System?, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994), Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment, London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1996), La nuova politica del welfare state: un'analisi comparata degli interventi restrittivi, in «Stato e Mercato», 46, pp. 350.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. (1984), Adversary Politics, Public Opinion and Electoral Cleavages, in Kavanagh, D. e Peele, G. (a cura di), Comparative Government and Politics. Essays in Honour of S. E. Finer, Boulder, Westview Press, pp. 214241.Google Scholar
Roubini, N. e Sachs, J. (1989a), Political and Economic Determinants of Budget Deficits in the Industrial Democracies, in «European Economic Review», 33, pp. 903938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (1989b), Government Spending and Budget Deficits in the Industrial Countries, in «Economic Policy», 8, pp. 100132.Google Scholar
Rowthorn, R. e Glyn, A. (1990), The Diversity of Unemployment Experiences since 1973, in Marglin, S.A. e Schor, G.B. (a cura di), The Golden Age of Capitalism, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 1947.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1974), Tecniche decisionali e sistema dei comitati, in «Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica», 4, pp. 345.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1976), Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis, London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1982), Rivisitando il pluralismo polarizzato, in G. Sartori, Teoria dei partiti e caso italiano, Milano, Sugarco, pp. 193214.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1984), Le «leggi» sull'influenza dei sistemi elettorali, in «Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica», 14, pp. 340.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (1991), Political Institutions, Decision Styles, and Policy Choices, in Czada, R. e Windhoff-Héritier, A. (a cura di), Political Choice, Institutions, Rules and the Limits of Rationality, Frankfurt am Mainz/Boulder, Campus/Westview, pp. 5386.Google Scholar
Schick, A. (1993), Governments versus Budget Deficits, in Weaver e Rockman, pp. 187236.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M.G. (1988), The Politics of Labour Market Policy, in Castles, Lehner e Schmidt, pp. 453.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1996), When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy, in «European Journal of Political Research», 30, pp. 155183.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P.C. (1974), Still the Century of Corporatism?, in «Review of Politics», 36, pp. 85131.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P.C. (1981), Interest Intermediation and Regime Governability in Contemporary Europe and North America, in Berger, pp. 287330.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P.C. (1989), Corporatism is Dead! Long Live Corporatism, in «Government and Opposition», 24, pp. 5473.Google Scholar
Schüttemeyer, S.S., (1994), Hierarchy and Efficiency in the Bundestag: The German Answer for Institutionalizing Parliament, in Copeland, G.W. e Patterson, S.C. (a cura di), Parliaments in the Modern World, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, pp. 2958.Google Scholar
Siniscalco, D. e Tabellini, G. (1993), Efficienza e rappresentanza del sistema elettorale, in «il Mulino», n. 4, pp. 810819.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S. (1989), Political Institutions and Tax Policy in the United States, Sweden, and Britain, in «World Politics», 61, pp. 500535.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (1984), Neo-Corporatist Industrial Relations and the Economic Crisis in West Germany, in Goldthorpe, pp. 291314.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (1994), Pay Restraint without Incomes Policy: Institutionalized Monetarism and Industrial Unionism in Germany, in Dore, R., Boyer, R. e Mars, Z. (a cura di), The Return to Incomes Policy, London, Pinter, pp. 118140.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. e Schmitter, P.C. (a cura di) (1985), Private Interest Government. Beyond Market and State, London, Sage.Google Scholar
Strom, K. (1990), Minority Government and Majority Rule, New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swank, D.H. (1988), The Political Economy of Government Domestic Expenditures in the Affluent Democracies, 1960-1980, in «American Journal of Political Science», 32, pp. 11201150.Google Scholar
Therborn, G. (1992), Lessons from ‘Corporatist’ Theorizations, in Pekkarinen, Pohjola e Rowthorn, pp. 2443.Google Scholar
Tufte, E.R. (1978), Political Control of the Economy, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Van Deth, J.W. (1995), Comparative Politics and the Decline of the Nation-State in Western Europe, in «European Journal of Political Research», 27, pp. 443462.Google Scholar
Weaver, R.K. e Rockman, B.A. (1993a), When and How Do Institutions Matter?, in Weaver e Rockman, pp. 445461.Google Scholar
Weaver, R.K. e Rockman, B.A. (a cura di) (1993b), Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the US and Abroad, Washington, Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Weir, M. e Skocpol, T. (1983), State Structure and Social Keynesian Responses to the Great Depression in Sweden and the United States, in «International Journal of Comparative Sociology», 24, pp. 429.Google Scholar
Western, B. (1994), Unionization and Labor Market Institutions in Advanced Capitalism, 1950-1985, in «American Journal of Sociology», 100, pp. 13291361.Google Scholar
Western, B. (1995), A Comparative Study of Working-Class Disorganization: Union Decline in Eighteen Advanced Capitalist Democracies, in «American Sociological Review», 60, pp. 165191.Google Scholar
Woldendorp, J., Keman, H. e Budge, I. (1993) Political Data 19451990, in «European Journal of Political Research», 24, pp. 1120.Google Scholar