Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T14:20:20.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Opening the ‘Black Box’ of asylum governance: decision-making and the politics of asylum policy-making

Part of: IPSR-RISP Migration collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2019

Andrea Pettrachin Open the ORCID record for Andrea Pettrachin [Opens in a new window]
Andrea Pettrachin*
Affiliation:
Migration Policy Centre, European University Institute, Firenze, Italy University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Complementing and challenging the existing literature on the Italian asylum crisis, this article develops an actor-centred approach to open the ‘black box’ of asylum governance, showing the constitutive effects of governance on the asylum issue. It then applies this approach to the case of the Veneto region in Italy during the recent ‘refugee crisis’. By doing so, the article, first, investigates the cognitive mechanisms that shape key actors’ asylum policy decisions. Drawing concepts and ideas from framing and sensemaking theories, it shows that, while there is certainly a strategic element that shapes actors' policy preferences, there is also a meaningful cognitive component in asylum governance. Indeed, it argues that actors' strategies are shaped, more than by anti-immigration public attitudes per se (as often assumed), by how political actors make sense of these attitudes. The article then applies SNA to examine how actors' understandings are located within and depend upon network relations and investigate actors' agency, power and interactions. It ultimately shows that local asylum policy outcomes are deeply influenced by the ‘politics of policy-making’, that is by power dynamics and how powerful actors position themselves, behave and mobilize their understandings. Finally, by examining the impact of policy outputs on cognitive micro-level mechanisms, the article sheds light on the interplay between the ‘regulatory’ and the ‘public reaction’ dimensions of the Italian asylum crisis, illustrating the relationship between public attitudes on migration, frame emergence, asylum policy-making, politics and public mobilizations in the active constitution of the Italian asylum crisis.

Keywords

Asylum governanceItalymigration politicspolitical partiesrefugee crisis
Type
Research Article
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , July 2020 , pp. 191 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The original version of this article was published with missing information from the author's affiliation and the financial statement. A notice detailing this has been published and the error rectified in the online PDF and HTML copies.

References

Albertazzi, D, Giovannini, A and Seddone, A (2018) No regionalism please, we are Leghisti!’ The transformation of the Italian Lega Nord under the leadership of Matteo Salvini. Regional & Federal Studies 28, 645–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2018.1512977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrosini, M (2018) Irregular Immigration in Southern Europe: Actors, Dynamics and Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, CK, Trondal, J and Ogard, M (2017) Governance in Turbulent Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin-Edwards, M, Blitz, B and Crawley, H (2018) The politics of evidence-based policy in Europe's ‘Migration Crisis’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1468307.Google Scholar
Berizzi, P (2015) “Un muro in paese per bloccare i rifugiati” l'ultima sfida del sindaco-sceriffo. La Repubblica, 20 July. http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2015/07/20/un-muro-in-paese-per-bloccare-i-rifugiati-lultima-sceriffo14.html (accessed 11 July 2019).Google Scholar
Bevir, M and Rhodes, R (2003) Governance Stories. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bird, A and Osland, JS (2005) Making sense of intercultural collaboration. International Studies of Management and Organization 35, 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2005.11043739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, V, Guillaume, J, Lambiotte, R and Lefebvre, E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N (1985) The Irrational Organization: Irrationality as A Basis for Organizational Action and Change. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Castelli Gattinara, P (2017) The ‘refugee crisis’ in Italy as a crisis of legitimacy. Contemporary Italian Politics 9, 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2017.1388639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M (2009) Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, JS (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
D'Angelo, A (2018) Italy: the ‘illegality factory’? Theory and practice of refugees’ reception in Sicily. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1468361.Google Scholar
Druckman, JN (2011) What's it all about? Framing in political science. In Keren, G (ed.), Perspectives on Framing. Hove: Psychology Press, pp. 279–96.Google Scholar
Eckstein, H (1975) Case studies and theory in political science. In Greenstein, FI and Polsby, NW (eds), Handbook of Political Science, vii: Political Science: Scope and Theory. Reading: Addison-Wesley, pp. 79–133.Google Scholar
Fiss, PC and Hirsh, PM (2005) The discourse of globalization: framing and sensemaking of an emerging concept. American Sociological Review 70, 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, A and Taylor, A (2016) In the shadow of fortress Europe? Impacts of European migration governance on Slovenia, Croatia and Macedonia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42, 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1102041.Google Scholar
Genovese, F, Belgioioso, M and Kern, FG (2016) The Political Geography of Migrant Reception and Public Opinion on Immigration: Evidence from Italy. Working Paper. http://federica-genovese.com/downloads/GBK_itmigr_231017.pdf.Google Scholar
Gianfreda, S (2018) Politicization of the refugee crisis? A content analysis of parliamentary debates in Italy, the UK, and the EU. Italian Political Science Review 48, 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2017.20.Google Scholar
Hay, C (2002) Political Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms Mills, J, Thurlow, A and Mills, AJ (2010) Making sense of sensemaking: the critical sensemaking approach. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 5, 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465641011068857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, E (2009) Regionalist party mobilisation on immigration. West European Politics 32, 514–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380902779071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Repubblica (2017) Minniti: “Sui migranti ho temuto per la tenuta democratica Paese”. 29 August. https://www.repubblica.it/politica/2017/08/29/news/minniti_sui_migranti_ho_temuto_per_la_tenuta_democratica_paese_-174164861/ (Accessed 11 July 2019).Google Scholar
La Stampa (2017) Immigrazione, Renzi: “Numeri non sostenibili. Non li reggiamo”, 28 July. https://www.lastampa.it/2017/06/28/italia/immigrazione-renzi-numeri-non-sostenibili-non-li-reggiamo-UFyDxjawdpKFBdGvDgxAjM/pagina.html (Accessed 5 January 2019).Google Scholar
Lunaria (2017) Accoglienza. La Propaganda e le Proteste del Rifiuto, le Scelte Istituzionali Sbagliate. Report, Focus N.1/2017. https://www.lunaria.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/0FOCUS1_DEFINITIVO_13marzo.pdf.Google Scholar
McDonnell, D (2006) A weekend in Padania: regionalist populism and the Lega Nord. Politics 26, 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2006.00259.x.Google Scholar
Padovani, C and Pavan, E (2016) Global governance and ICTs: exploring online governance networks around gender and media. Global Networks 16, 350–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquino, G and Valbruzzi, M (2017) The Italian Democratic Party, its nature and its Secretary. Revista Española de Ciencia Política 44, 275–299. https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.44.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierre, J (2000) Debating Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheufele, DA (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication 49, 103–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x.Google Scholar
Tronchin, C and Di Pasquale, E (2017) Il Racconto dell'Immigrazione nei Media Locali (il Caso di Treviso). Research Report from the Fondazione Moressa. http://www.nodiscriminazioni.it/files/Rapporto-finale-ricerca-Fondazione-Moressa.pdf.Google Scholar
Urso, O (2018) The politicization of immigration in Italy. Who frames the issue, when and how. Italian Political Science Review 48, 365–381. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2018.16.Google Scholar
Weick, KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Weick, KE (2001) Making Sense of the Organization. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Zolberg, AR (1989) The next waves: migration theory for a changing world. The International Migration Review 23, 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/019791838902300302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed