Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:59:28.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Courts as extra-cabinet control mechanisms for secondary legislation: evidence from Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2019

Elisa Rebessi Open the ORCID record for Elisa Rebessi [Opens in a new window]  and
Francesco Zucchini
Elisa Rebessi*
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Political Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
Francesco Zucchini
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Political Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Ministers can have an incentive to adopt policies through secondary legislation that deviates from the general compromise reached via the primary legislation. We suggest that when secondary legislation is at stake, in some countries coalition partners can rely upon the ex-ante legal scrutiny of courts as an extra-cabinet control mechanism. We focus on the interaction between governments and the Council of State, the highest administrative court and the most important consultative body of the government in Italy. Our findings support the general hypothesis that the Council's activism as an advisor is generated by the demand for control mechanisms on the secondary legislation. Such a demand is affected by specific political conditions, i.e. the level of government heterogeneity and government alternation. The findings on the Italian case can be a starting point for research on the different levels of involvement of administrative courts in the executive politics that characterize European Democracies.

Keywords

Coalition governancecourtsItalian political systemmultiparty politicssecondary legislation
Type
Research Article
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , July 2020 , pp. 159 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainis, M (2009) Scandalosi controllori controllati. La Stampa, 18 March. Available at https://www.lastampa.it/2009/03/18/cultura/scandalosi-controllori-controllati-H8SGa0RgGQflnL1ahb0YFJ/pagina.html (Accessed 3 December 2015).Google Scholar
Benoit, K and Laver, M (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benussi, S (2012) Il dibattito parlamentare sull'istituzione della Corte dei conti (1861–1862). Amministrare 1, 139–167.Google Scholar
Bin, R (2013) Cose serie, non riforme costituzionali!. Quaderni Costituzionali 2, 317–328.Google Scholar
Brouard, S (2009) The politics of constitutional veto in France: constitutional council, legislative majority and electoral competition. West European Politics 32, 384–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouard, S and Hönnige, C (2017) Constitutional courts as veto players: lessons from the United States, France and Germany. European Journal of Political Research 56, 529–552.Google Scholar
Calandra, P (1978) Storia dell'amministrazione pubblica in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Carroll, R and Cox, GW (2012) Shadowing ministers: monitoring partners in coalition governments. Comparative Political Studies 45, 220–236.Google Scholar
Chevallier, J (2007) Le Conseil d'État, au Coeur de l'État. Pouvoirs Revue Française d’Études Constitutionnelles et Politiques 123, 5–18.Google Scholar
Curini, L and Iacus, S (2008) Italian spatial competition between 2006 and 2008: a changing party system? Paper presented at the XXII Congress of the Italian Political Science Society (SISP), Pavia, September 5–8, 2008.Google Scholar
de Wet, E (2008) The reception process in the Netherlands and Belgium. In Keller, H and Stone Sweet, A (eds), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 229–309.Google Scholar
Di Virgilio, A, Giannetti, D, Pedrazzani, A and Pinto, L (2015) Party competition in the 2013 Italian elections: evidence from an expert survey. Government and Opposition 50, 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, J and Weingast, B (1992) A positive theory of statutory interpretation. International Review of Law and Economics 12, 263–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fittipaldi, E (2009) Consiglio di Stato e di casta. l'Espresso, 08 October. Available at http://espresso.repubblica.it/palazzo/2009/10/08/news/consiglio-di-stato-e-di-casta-1.16244 (Accessed 23 April 2017).Google Scholar
Laver, M and Hunt, BW (1992) Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laver, M and Shepsle, KA (1996) Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinet and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsmeyer, CS and Pierce, HN (2011) The eyes that bind: junior ministers as oversight mechanisms in coalition governments. Journal of Politics 73, 1152–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mania, R and Panara, M (2014) Nomenklatura. Chi Comanda Davvero in Italia. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Martin, LW and Vanberg, G (2004) Policing the bargain: coalition government and parliamentary scrutiny. American Journal of Political Science 48, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, LW and Vanberg, G (2005) Coalition policymaking and legislative review. American Political Science Review 99, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, LW and Vanberg, G (2011) Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, LW and Vanberg, G (2014) Parties and policymaking in multiparty governments: the legislative median, ministerial autonomy, and the coalition compromise. American Journal of Political Science 58, 979–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, M, Mendes, S and Budge, I (2004) What are elections for? Conferring the median mandate. British Journal of Political Science 34, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mény, Y (1994) Conseil d'Etat, Consiglio di Stato: imitazione o divergenze parallele? In Mény, Y (ed.), ‘Il Consiglio di Stato in Francia e in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
Moscarini, A (2008) Sui decreti del Governo ‘di natura non regolamentare’ che producono effetti normativi. Giurisprudenza Costituzionale 53, 5075–5108.Google Scholar
Müller, WC and Strøm, K (eds) (2000) Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Page, EC (2010) Accountability as a bureaucratic minefield: lessons from a comparative study. West European Politics 33, 1010–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale university Press.Google Scholar
Righettini, MS (1998) Il Giudice Amministratore. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rizzo, S and Stella, GA (2010) La casta. Milano: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Romano, S (1932) Le funzioni e i caratteri del Consiglio di Stato. In Romano, S, Salata, F, Rava, L, Avet, E, Bezzi, G, Giannini, A, Corso, G, Petrocchi, C and Giuffrida, V (eds) Consiglio di Stato, Studi in occasione del centenario, vol 1. Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato. Roma, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S, Lindseth, P and Emerson, B (2017) Comparative Administrative Law. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoni, M and Zucchini, F (2004) Does policy stability increase the Constitutional Court independence? Public Choice 120, 439–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoni, M and Zucchini, F (2006) Legislative output and the Constitutional Court in Italy. Constitutional Political Economy 17, 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarvilinna, S (2007) Court administration in Finland. Scandinavian Studies in Law 51, 591–605.Google Scholar
Scalfari, E (2015) Come battere la corruzione e come costruire la nuova Europa. La Repubblica, 22 March. Available at http://www.repubblica.it/politica/2015/03/22/news/come_battere_la_corruzione_e_come_costruire_la_nuova_europa-110173099/ (Accessed 23 April 2017).Google Scholar
Steunenberg, B (1997) Courts, cabinet and coalition parties: the politics of Euthanasia in a Parliamentary setting. British Journal of Political Science 27, 551–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, K, Wolfgang, CM and Torbjörn, B (eds) (2008) Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thies, MF (2001) Keeping tabs on partners: the logic of delegation in coalition governments. American Journal of Political Science 45, 580–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, G (2002) Veto Players: Foundations of Institutional Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, G and Chang, E (2004) Veto players and the structure of budgets in advanced industrialized countries. European Journal of Political Research 43, 449–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Damme, M (2001) The council of state: Institution on the junction of the three traditional powers of state. In Lanotte, JV (ed.), The Principle of Equality: A South African and Belgian Perspective. Antwerpen, Apeldoorn: Maklu, pp. 71–88.Google Scholar
Volcansek, ML (2000) Constitutional Politics in Italy. The Constitutional Court. Houndmills: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Zucchini, F (2011) Government alternation and legislative agenda setting. European Journal of Political Research 50, 749–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Rebessi and Zucchini Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/8Z68JU
Link