Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T10:28:51.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Victims of Crime and the Criminal Process*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2014

Dionysios Spinellis
Get access

Extract

In the last two decades the victim of crimes has been moved from the periphery to the centre of interest of penal law and criminal policy.

In the domain of substantive penal law the victimological approach created a trend toward the restriction of the field of application of certain penal provisions, especially in cases where the victim could have protected himself or herself more effectively, e.g., in fraud cases.

In the area of criminal procedure the trend has been toward an increased protection of the victim. This trend was extended gradually to the policies of crime prevention and influenced even the policies of enforcement of penal decisions and treatment of offenders. In this paper, however, I am going to address myself mainly to the problems of the protection of and assistance to the victim in the penal process, which raise a special concern, since they seem sometimes to be in conflict with other purposes of the penal law in general and the criminal process in particular.

Type
Research Article
Information
Israel Law Review , Volume 31 , Issue 1-3 , Winter-Summer 1997 , pp. 337 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

**

Professor of Law, University of Athens Law School.

References

Androulakis, N., Fundamental Concepts of the Criminal Process (in Greek) (2nd ed., 1994).Google Scholar
Androulakis, N., Penal Law, General Part, I (in Greek), (1991) (cited: General Part).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics (in the ancient Greek original), “Papyros” edition, (1949).Google Scholar
Benaki-Psarouda, A., The Civil Action in the Criminal Proceedings (in Greek), (1982). (cited: Benaki).Google Scholar
Bottomley, A.K, Criminology in Focus, (Martin Robertson, Suffolk, 1979).Google Scholar
Boulan, F., “Le double visage de l'action civile exercee devant la juridiction repressive”, in Juris Classeur Periodique. La Semaine Juridique I–II, (1973) 2563.Google Scholar
Burns, P., “A Comparative Overview of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Schemes”, (1983) Victimology 102–110.Google Scholar
Burns, P., “Some Criminal Justice Responses to Criminal Victim Needs” (1985) Victimology 646–661.Google Scholar
Council of Europe, Research on Victimisation, 16th Criminological Research Conference, (1986).Google Scholar
Council of Europe, (Legal Affairs), The Position of the Victim in the Framework of Criminal Law and Procedure (1985).Google Scholar
Dabin, J., Theorie Generate du Droit (1969).Google Scholar
Dalloz, , Code de Procedure Penale et Code de Justice Militaire, (1982–1983).Google Scholar
Damaska, M., “Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure: A Comparative Study”, (1973) U. Penn. L.R. 506–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damaska, M., “Structures of Authority and Comparative Criminal Procedure”, (1975) Yale L.J. 480–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk van, J.J.M., General Report, Council of Europe, Research on Victimization, (1986) 106–119, (cited: Report).Google Scholar
Dijk van, J.J.M., Conclusions, Council of Europe, Research on Victimization, (1986) 120–122, (cited: Conclusions).Google Scholar
Dijk van, J.J.M., “Victim Rights: A Right to Better Services or a Right to Active Participation?”, in Criminal Law in Action, (Dijk, van et al. eds., 1986), 351–375 (cited: Services).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, R., The Symbolic Politics of Victim (1983) 213–224.Google Scholar
Frank, R., “Vom Intelektuellen Verbrechensschaden”, Festgabe für Heck-Rumelin-A.B. Schmidt, (1931) 49–59.Google Scholar
Frehsee, D., Schadenswiedergutmachung als Instrument strafrechtlicher Sozialkontrolle (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galaway, , “Victim Participation in the Penal-Corrective Process”, (1985) Victimology 617–630.Google Scholar
Göppinger, , Kriminologie (4th ed., 1980) 604.Google Scholar
Granier, J., “La partie civile au proces penal”, (1958) Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé”, 1–41.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M.S. and Ruback, B.B., “A Model of Crime Victim Decision Making”, (1985) Victimology 600–616.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J., “A Third “Model” of the Criminal Process”, (1970) 79 Yale L.J. 359–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, T.A., “One Hundred Years of Restitution; An International Review and Prospectus for Research”, (1983) Victimology 190–203.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law (1970).Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A., Punishment and Responsibility, Essays in the Philosophy of Law (1970).Google Scholar
Hegel, , Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts oder Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse, (Herausgeber Eduard Gans, 1833).Google Scholar
Henkel, H., Einführung in die Rechtsphilosophie (1964).Google Scholar
Hirsch, H. J., “Zur Abgrenzung von Strafrecht und Zivilrecht”, Engisch-Festschrift, (1969) 304–327.Google Scholar
Hirsch, H.J., “Die Stellung des Verletzten im Strafrechtssystem”, lecture published in Greek translation, in the Records of the Second National Congress of the Greek Association of Penal Law, (1989) 193–214.Google Scholar
Jakobs, , Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, (1983).Google Scholar
Jareborg, /von Hirsch, , “Neoklassizismus” in der skandinavischen Kriminalpoltik: Sein Einfluss, seine Grundprinzipien und Kriterien, in Neuere Tendenzen der Kriminalpoltik, (Eser, /Cornils, eds., 1987) 35–64.Google Scholar
Jescheck-Weigend, , Lehrbuch des Strafrechts, Allgemeiner Teil, (5th ed., 1996).Google Scholar
Jung, , “Die Stellung des Verletzten im Strafprozess”, (1981) 93 Zeitschrift fur die Gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 1145–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadish, & Paulsen, , Criminal Law and its Processes, Cases and Materials, (3rd ed., 1975).Google Scholar
Kant, , Metaphysik der Sitten, 2 Teil, Metaphysische Anfangsgrunde der Rechtslehre, Herausgeber Karl Vorlander, (4th ed., 1922, unveranderter Nachdruck, 1966).Google Scholar
Kleinknecht, /Meyer, , Strafprozessordnung (Kurz-Kommentar), (37th ed., 1985).Google Scholar
Knudten, R.D. and Knudten, M.S., “Opfer und Zeugenprogramme in den Vereinigten Staaten”, in Kirchhoff, and Sessar, K., eds., Das Verbrechensopfer. Ein Reader zur Victimologie, (1979).Google Scholar
Lombart, F., Rapport introductif Annales de droit de Liege, (1984) 129–159.Google Scholar
Mangakis, , Penal Law, General Part, (in Greek) (2nd ed., 1982).Google Scholar
Mantovani, , Diritto Penale, (1980).Google Scholar
Mayhew, , “The Effects of Crime, Victims, the Public and Fear”, in Research on Victimization, 16th Criminological Research Conference, Council of Europe, (1986) 47–63.Google Scholar
Merle, R. and Vitu, A., Traité de droit criminel, Procedure penale, (2nd ed., 1973)Google Scholar
Miers, D., “Compensation and Conceptions of Victims of Crime”, (1983) Victimology 204–212.Google Scholar
Packer, H., “Two Models of the Criminal Process”, (1964) 113 U. Perm. L.R. 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papageorghiou, K., “Retribution, Just Reward and Justice” (in Greek), (1992) 43 Poinika Chronika, 481.Google Scholar
Peters, K., Strafprozess (2nd ed., 1966).Google Scholar
Pettit, P. and Braithwaite, J., “Not Just Deserts, Even in Sentencing”, (1993) 4 Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riess, P., Die Rechtsstellung des Verletzten im Strafverfahren, Gutachten C fur den 55 (Deutschen Juristentag, 1984).Google Scholar
Roxin, C, “Die Wiedergutmachung im System der Strafzwecke”, in Wiedergutmachung und Strafrecht, Neue Kriminologische Studien, (Schoch, ed., 1987) 37–55.Google Scholar
Roxin, C, “Die Stellung des Opfers im Strafverfahren”, (in Greek translation), Records of the Second National Congress of the Greek Association of Penal Law, (1989) 177–191.Google Scholar
Roxin, C, Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, (1992).Google Scholar
Sebba, L., “The Victim's Role in the Penal Process: A Theoretical Orientation”, (1982) 30 Am. J. Comp. L. 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebba, L., “Victims of Offences”, in Criminal Law in Action, (Dijk, van et al. eds., 1986) 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sessar, K., Wiedergutmachen oder Strafen, Einstellungen in der Bevölkerung und der Justiz (1992).Google Scholar
Shapland, J., “Victims, the Criminal Justice System and Compensation”, (1984) British Journal of Criminology, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapland, J., “The Criminal Justice System and the Victim”, (1985) Victimology 585–599.Google Scholar
Shapland, J., “Victims and Justice: Needs, Rights and Services”, in Criminal Law in Action, (Dijk, van et al. eds., 1986) 391–404.Google Scholar
Spinellis, D., Basic Elements of Penal Law and Penal Procedure, (in Greek), (1990) 26–27.Google Scholar
Spinellis, D., “The Civil Action: A Useful Alternative Solution to the Victims' Problems?”, in Criminal Law in Action, (Dijk, van et al. eds., 1986) 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefani-Levasseur-Bouloc, , Droit pénal général, (14th ed., 1992).Google Scholar
Sykes, G.M., Criminology, (1978).Google Scholar
Tsitsoura, A., “Criminal Justice Responses to Victimisation”, (1985) Victimology 574–584.Google Scholar
Tsoukalas, , Penal Procedure (in Greek), A-B, (1943).Google Scholar
United Nations, Seventh U.N. Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Draft Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice, A: Relating to Victims of Crime and B: Relating to Victims of Abuse of Power (1985) (cited: Seventh UN Congress).Google Scholar
Vennard, J., “Compensation by the Offender: The Victim's Perspective”, (1978) Victimology, 154–160.Google Scholar
Vérin, , La reparation due aux victimes d' infractions pénales, at 120 (HEUNI 2, Towards a Victim Policy in Europe, 1984).Google Scholar
Villmow, , “The Implications of Research on Victimisation for Criminal and Social Policy”, in Research on Victimization, 16th Criminological Research Conference, Council of Europe, (1986) 68–91.Google Scholar
Waller, I., “Victima vs. Regina vs. Malefactor: Justice for the Next 100 Years”, in Criminal Law in Action, (Dijk, van et al. eds., 1986) 421–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigend, Th., “Tagungsbericht”, in (1981) 93 Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 1282–1284.Google Scholar
Weigend, Th., “Problems of Victim/Witness Assistance Programs”, (1983) Victimology 91–101.Google Scholar
Weigend, Th., “Viktimologische und kriminologische Überlegungen zur Stellung des Verletzten im Strafverfahren”, (1986) 96 Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 761–793.Google Scholar
Zaubermann, R., “Victims in the Field of Criminology”, in Research on Victimization, 16th Criminological Research Conference, Council of Europe, (1986) 13–43.Google Scholar