Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T11:27:05.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The International Protection of Human Rights and the Jewish Question (An Historical Survey)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Nathan Feinberg
Get access

Extract

To mark the twentieth anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations designated 1968 to be the International Year for Human Rights. The call went out to peoples and States all over the world to give particular thought then to the question of human rights and freedoms and contribute to their promotion and protection. Wherever the subject is raised, discussion will no doubt dwell upon the problems of the present and the future. I believe, however, that this is a suitable occasion to widen the scope, to cast a glance over the past, and to review the role of the Jews and of the “Jewish Question” in the nineteenth, and in the early years of the twentieth, century in instilling the concept of human rights into the conscience of mankind; it is also an opportunity to examine the part played by the Jews in the advancement of those rights at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919–1920.

From an historical point of view, the modern concept of human rights springs essentially from the rationalistic and cosmopolitan philosophy of the Enlightenment prevailing in the second half of the eighteenth century, and from the declarations framed at the end of that century in North America and, subsequently, in France during the Revolution. It was these declarations that laid the foundations of the democratic and liberal State. But the roots of the concept can be traced back to the Stoic philosophy of ancient Greece, to the teachings of the early Roman philosophers and lawyers and to the tenets of the medieval theologians; and it is, indeed, strange that only rarely have those engaged in the history of it made mention of the fact that ancient Hebrew religious thought, too, is concerned with the inherent dignity of Man and gives special prominence to the principle that all who are created in the image of God are equal—a principle clearly reflected in the status which the law of Moses assigns to “the stranger that sojourns among you”, and in the liberal attitude of that law towards the slave, as compared with that of other peoples.

Type
Articles
Information
Israel Law Review , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 487 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Grotius, Hugo, De Jure Belli ac Pacis Book II, Chap. XX, §40, et Chap. XXV, §8, No. 2, Publications of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, vol. II (Oxford, 1925) 504–506, 584Google Scholar.

2 Vattel, E., Le Droit des Gens, Principes de la loi naturelle Livre II, Chap. IV, §56, et Chap. V, §70, Published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, vol. II (Washington, 1916) 298–300, 307–308Google Scholar.

3 Pufendorf, S., De Jure Naturae et Gentium Book VIII, Chap. I, §§ 2 et 6, Publications of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, vol. II (Oxford, 1934) 1133–34, 1140–43Google Scholar.

4 See Gardot, André, “Jean Bodin, sa place parmi les fondateurs du droit international” Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International de la Haye (hereinafter referred to as R.A.D.I.), tome 50 (Paris, 1935) 627–28Google Scholar.

5 See Feinberg, N., “The National Treatment Clause in Historical Perspective (A Controversy with Czarist Russia)” Recueil d'Etudes de droit international en hommage à Paul Guggenheim (Genève, 1968) 49–54Google Scholar.

6 See Duparc, J. Fouques, La Protection des minorités de race, de langue et de religion (Paris, 1922) 65Google Scholar.

7 The Parliamentary History of England from the Earliest Period to the Year 1803, vol. XXII (London, 1814), cols. 223–24Google Scholar.

8 British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 62 (London, 1877) 705Google Scholar.

9 See Rolin-Jacquemyns, G. E., “Note sur la théorie du droit international, A propos d'une lettre de M. le Professeur Arnt”, Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée, vol. VII (Bruxelles, 1876) 673–78Google Scholar.

10 Bluntschli, J.C., Le Droit international codifié Traduit de l'allemand par Lardy, G. (Paris, 1870) 251–52Google Scholar.

11 Mandelstam, A., Le Sort de l'Empire Ottoman (Lausanne, 1917) 445–47Google Scholar.

12 See ibid. 447–51.

13 See Fauchille, P., Traité de droit international public, tome 1, première partie (Paris, 1922) 572Google Scholar.

14 Rolin-Jacquemyns, op. cit., 673–80; id., ibid., “Le Droit international et la phase actuelle de la Question d'Orient” 293–385.

15 See Rougier, A., “La Théorie de l'intervention d'humanité”, Revue Générate de Droit International Public, tome XVII (Paris, 1910) 468–526Google Scholar.

16 Ibid. 471. The translation into English of the passage quoted, as well as the translations of all other passages quoted from books in French, is the author's.

17 See Mandelstam, op. cit., 418–19.

18 See Rougier, op. cit., 482 et 501, note 1.

19 See de Louter, J., Le Droit international positif, tome 1 (Oxford, 1920) 258Google Scholar.

20 See Mandelstam, A., “La Protection internationale des droits de l'Homme”, R.A.D.I., tome 38 (Paris, 1932) 195, note 2Google Scholar.

21 See Mandelstam, , Le Sort de l'Empire Ottoman 422–45Google Scholar.

22 Ibid. 421–22.

23 Lauterpacht, Hersch, “The Grotian Tradition in International Law”, The British Year Book of International Law, vol. 23 (London, 1946) 46Google Scholar.

24 Strisower, L., “Intervention”, Wörterbuch des Völkerrechts und der Diplomatie, Strupp, von K., erster Band (Berlin, 1924) 581Google Scholar.

25 de Visscher, Charles, Théories et réalités en droit international public, 3ème éd. (Paris, 1960), 219–21Google Scholar.

26 Guggenheim, P., Traité de droit international public, tome I (Genève, 1953) 289–91Google Scholar.

27 Fauchille, op. cit., 578.

28 Rougier, op. cit., 525.

29 Ibid. 477.

30 Wolf, Lucien, Notes on the Diplomatic History of the Jewish Question (London, 1919) 11Google Scholar.

31 Adler, Cyrus and Margalith, Aaron M., With Firmness in the Right, American Diplomatic Action Affecting Jews, 1840–1945 (New York, 1946) 101Google Scholar.

32 Luzzatti, Luigi, God in Freedom (New York, 1930) 462Google Scholar, note 2.

33 Adler, Cyrus, The Voice of America on Kishineff (Philadelphia, 1904) 469–76, 478–81Google Scholar.

34 Adler and Margalith, op. cit., 125.

35 Ibid. 125–26.

30 Fouques Duparc, op. cit., 104.

37 Kohler, Max J., Jewish Disabilities in the Balkan States, American Contributions Toward their Removal, with Particular Reference to the Congress of Berlin (New York, 1916) 40–43Google Scholar.

38 The Legal Sufferings of the Jews in Russia, Edited by Wolf, Lucien (London, 1912) p. XGoogle Scholar.

39 Wolf, , Notes on the Diplomatic History of the Jewish Question, 28Google Scholar.

40 Ibid. 29.

41 See Kohler, op. cit., 40–79; Leven, N., Cinquante Ans d'histoire, L'Alliance Israélite Universelle (1860–1910) (Paris, 1911) 171–232Google Scholar.

42 Leven, op. cit., 230–31.

43 Feinberg, N., La Question des minorités à la Conférence de la Paix de 1919–1920 et l'action juive en faveur de la protection internationale des minorités (Paris, 1929) 114–15Google Scholar.

44 Ibid. 32–140.

45 Wehberg, H., Institut de Droit International, Tableau Général des Résolutions (1873–1956) (Bâle, 1957) 36–7Google Scholar.

46 Mandelstam, op. cit., R.A.D.I., tome 38, 218.

47 Lauterpacht, op. cit., 46.

48 Charles de Visscher, op. cit., 220.

49 Quoted from Graven, Jean, “Les Crimes contre l'Humanite”, R.A.D.I., tome 76 (Paris, 1951) 487Google Scholar.

50 Ibid. 459–60.