Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:18:38.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Effective is Criminal Fine Enforcement in the Israeli Criminal Justice System?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2014

Tomer Einat
Get access

Extract

Over-burdening of the prison system and serious reservations as to the usefulness of the prison sentence as a means of reducing crimes rates have led penologists and policymakers to seek ways to broaden the repertoire of criminal punishments available to the courts. In the search for effective and affordable sentencing policies, there has been increasing interest in the development and elaboration of intermediate sanctions as part of a menu of sentencing choices that match the severity of punishment to the seriousness of the crime.

This trend is clearly reflected in the development of the penal system in Israel. In elaborating alternatives to imprisonment, an integrated model, incorporating welfare and rehabilitation considerations, has emerged. Nevertheless, Israeli judges have remarkably few sentencing alternatives at their disposal, and the penal sanctions available to them can be counted on the fingers of one hand, namely, imprisonment, suspended prison sentence, probation, community service, and the fine.

Type
Articles
Information
Israel Law Review , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , Spring 1999 , pp. 322 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hillsman, S. and Greene, J. “The Use of Fine as an Intermediate Sanction”, in Burne, M.J., Lurigio, J.A. and Petersilia, J., eds., Smart Sentencing: The Emergence of Intermediate Sanctions (Sage Publications, 1992)Google Scholar.

2 Kannai, R., Legal Frameworks for Guiding and Exercise of the Judge's Discretion in Sentencing (Ramat-Gan, Bar-Ilan University, 1991)Google Scholar.

3 Sebba, L., “Sanctioning Policy in Israel — A Historical Overview”, (1996) Isr. L.R. 260Google Scholar.

4 McDonald, D.C., Greene, J. and Worzella, C., Day Fines in American Courts: The Staten Island and Milwaukee Experiments (US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 1992)Google Scholar.

5 See Lewis, infra n. 8.

6 Hillsman, S., “Fines and Fine Administration”, (1988) 13 Justice System J. 5–17Google Scholar; Morgan, R. and Bowles, R., “Fines: The Case for Review”, (1981) Criminal L.R.Google Scholar

7 Albrecht, Hans-Jorg and Johnson, Elmer H., “Fines and Justice Administration: The Experience of the Federal Republic of Germany”, (1980) 4 Int'l J. Comp. Applied Crim. Justice 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Greene, J.A., “Structuring Criminal Fines: Making an ‘Intermediate Penalty’ More Useful and Equitable”, (1988) 13 Justice System J. 37–38Google Scholar; Lewis, D.E. “A Linear Model of Fine Enforcement with Application to England and Wales”, (1988) J. Quantitative Criminology 1Google Scholar.

9 Walker, N. and Padfield, N., Sentencing: Theory, Law and Practice (London, Dublin and Edinburgh, Butterworths, 1996)Google Scholar.

10 Blumstein, A., “Making Sentencing Policy More Rational and More Effective”, (1991) Isr. L.R. 617Google Scholar.

11 Hillsman, S. and Casale, S., Enforcement of Fines as Criminal Sanctions: The English Experience and Its Relevance to American Practice (Washington DC, National Institute of Justice, 1986)Google Scholar; Softley, P., Fines in Magistrate's Courts: Home Office Research (London, HMSO, 1978)Google Scholar.

12 Whittaker, C. and Mackie, A., Enforcing Financial Penalties (London, Home Office Research Study, 1997)Google Scholar.

13 Hassin, Y. and Kremnitzer, M., “Punishment Uniformity in Traffic Violations”, (1988) Laws 18: 1Google Scholar.

14 Cole, J.F., Mahoney, B., Thornton, M. and Hunson, R.A., The Practices and Attitudes of Trial Court Judges Regarding Fines as a Criminal Sanction (Washington DC, National Institute of Justice, 1987)Google Scholar.

15 S. Hillsman and S. Casale, supra n. 11.

16 Duff, A. “Retributive Punishment — Ideals and Actualities”, (1991) Isr. L.R. 422CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Hillsman, S.T. and Mahoney, B., “Collecting and Enforcing Criminal Fines: A Review of Court Processes, Practices and Problems”, (1988) 13 Justice System Journal 17–37Google Scholar.

18 Carlen, P. and Cook, D., Paying for Crime (London, Milton Keynes, Open University Press, 1989)Google Scholar.

19 Hillsman, S., “The Growing Challenge of Fine Administration to Court Managers”, (1988) 13 Justice System J. 5–16Google Scholar.

20 Sichel, J., Report on American State Statutes Relating to Fines in Criminal Cases (New York, Vera Institute of Justice, 1982) 12Google Scholar.

21 Softley, P. and Moxon, D., Fine Enforcement: An Evaluation of Practices in Individual Courts (London, Home Office Research and Planning Unit, HMSO, 1982)Google Scholar.

22 See Hillsman and Casale, supra n. 11.

23 Zamist, I., “Report on New York City Empirical Research on Fines” in Fines in Sentencing (New York, Vera Institute of Justice, Working Paper No. 7, 1981)Google Scholar; Tait, J., “A Court-Based Notification System for Traffic Defendants”, (1988) 13 Justice System J.Google Scholar

24 See Softley, supra n. 11. Moxon, D., Fine Default, Unemployment and the Use of Imprisonment (London, Home Office Research, 1983)Google Scholar; Morris, A. and Gelsthorpe, L., “Not Paying for Crime, Issues in Fine Enforcement”, (1990) Crim. L.R.Google Scholar

25 Hillsman, S., Sichel, J.L and Mahoney, B., Fines in Sentencing: A Study of the Use of Fines as a Criminal Sentencing (Washington DC, National Institute of Justice, 1984)Google Scholar.

26 See Lewis, supra n. 8.

27 Young, P., Punishment, Money and the Legal Order: An Analysis of the Emergence of Monetary Sanctions with Special Reference to Scotland (Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, 1987)Google Scholar; Moxon, D., Sutton, M. and Hedderman, C., Unit Fines: Experiments in Four Courts: Home Office Research Planning Unit (London, HMSO, 1990)Google Scholar.

28 See Hillsman and Casale, supra n. 11. See Whittaker and Mackie, supra n. 12.

29 Crow, I. and Simon, F., Unemployment and Magistrates Court (London, NACRO, 1987)Google Scholar. See Carlen and Cook, supra n. 18.

30 See Whittaker and Mackie, supra n. 12.

31 See Hillsman, supra n. 6.

32 Vera Institute of Justice, How to Use Structured Fines (Day Fines) as an Intermediate Sanction (US Department of Justice, 1996)Google Scholar.

33 See Cole, Mahoney, Hornton and Hunson, supra, n. 14.

34 See Hillsman, supra n. 6.

35 Klein, R. A., Alternative Sentencing, Intermediate Sanctions and Probation (Cincinnati, Anderson Publishing, 1997)Google Scholar.

36 Hillsman, S., “Fines and Day Fines”, in Morris, N. and Tonry, M., eds., Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

37 See Vera Institute of Justice, supra n. 32. Weisburd, D., Waring, E. and Chayet, E.F., White Collar Crime and Criminal Careers (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

38 See Vera Institute of Justice, supra n. 32. See Sichel, supra n. 20.

39 Israeli Penal Code, 1977, sec. 66(a).

40 See Whittaker and Mackie, supra n. 12.

41 Cummings, L., “Developing a Microcomputer-Based Management Information System for Fine Administration”, (1988) 13 Justice System J. 80–90Google Scholar.

42 See Hillsman and Mahoney, supra n. 17.

43 The Center is charged with the collection of fines, fees and taxes and the execution of court rulings in a number of areas governed by the Fishery Ordinance, the Ports Ordinance, the Fruit Council Law, the Poultry Board, the Vegetable Export Board, Price and Services Control, Equipment Registration and IDF Mobilization, the Mining Ordinance, the Safety in the Work Place Ordinance, the National Parks Law, Tax Laws, the Firearms Law, the Prison Ordinance, the Credit Cards Law, the Entry Visa Law, Identity Card and Trespassing, the Telecommunications Law, and the Wildlife Protection Law.

44 Israeli Court Administration Collection of Ordinances of the Center for Fine Collection (1996).

45 See Hillsman and Casale, supra n. 11. See Hillsman, supra n. 6.

46 Such as the databases of the National Insurance, the Israeli Police Force, the Companies Registrar, the Licensing Department of the Ministry of Transport, Bezek Telephone Company, the Electric Company, the Execution Department, Civil Secretariats of the Courts, “Tkefon” and “Tkefon Iski” — (an on-line program with access to all court databases), the program of the Center.

47 Young, P., Punishment, Money and the Legal Order: An Analysis of the Emergence of Monetary Sanctions with Special Reference to Scotland (Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, 1987)Google Scholar. Central Department of Statistics, Collection of Statistical Findings from Recently-Published Surveys, Jerusalem, Central Department of Statistics, 1996, in Hebrew).

48 Walker, N., Sentencing: Theory, Law and Practice (London, Butterworths, 1985)Google Scholar.

49 Von-Hirsch, A., Knapp, K. and Tonry, M., The Sentencing Commission and Its Guidelines (Boston, Northeastern University Press, 1987)Google Scholar.

50 See Hillsman, supra n. 6.

51 See Greene, supra n. 8.

52 See Hillsman and Mahoney, supra n. 17.

53 See Softley and Moxon, supra n. 21.

54 See Carlen and Cook, supra n. 18.

55 See Vera Institute of Justice, supra n. 32.

56 See Hillsman and Casale, supra n. 11.

57 Ibid., at 39.

58 P. Softley and D. Moxon, supra n. 21.

59 See Hillsman and Casale, supra n. 11.

60 See Hillsman, supra n. 6.