Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:58:18.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The pattern of support networks among the community dwelling elderly in urban Ireland: variations with mental disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Michael Kirby ,
Aisling Denihan ,
Irene Bruce ,
Davis Coakley  and
Brian A Lawlor
Michael Kirby
Affiliation:
Waterford Regional Hospital, Ireland
Aisling Denihan
Affiliation:
Department of Old Age Psychiatry, St Vincent's Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
Irene Bruce
Affiliation:
Mercer Institute for Research on Ageing, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Davis Coakley
Affiliation:
Mercer's Institute for Research on Ageing, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Brian A Lawlor
Affiliation:
Johnathan Swift Clinic and Mercer's Institute for Research on Ageing, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: The changing family and social patterns in modern society are likely to influence the availability of informal support for older people. The aims of this study were to determine the support network distribution of a community dwelling elderly population in Dublin, and of those with mental disorders (dementia, depression and anxiety).

Methods: Interviews with 1,001 community dwelling older people using GMS-AGECAT. In addition, a support network assessment instrument was administered, which identifies five different support network types. The local integrated and wider community focused networks are characterised by extensive community involvement, family dependent networks by close family support, and the local self contained and private restricted networks by low levels of family and community involvement.

Results: Of the elderly population, 83% had support networks characterised by close community and/or family involvement. Subjects with cognitive impairment had lower levels of informal support from the community, as indicated by a lower proportion of local integrated (44% v 63%) and a higher proportion of private restricted (6% v 12%) networks. Late life depression was also associated with decreased levels of community integration.

Conclusions: The elderly in Dublin appear to have high levels of informal support. The extensive support may be a factor in the lower rates of depression found in Dublin than in London and New York. While the overall level of informal support available to older people with mental disorders in the community remains high, a proportion have low levels of family and community involvement and consequently their mental health problems may go unrecognised.

Keywords

Support networkElderlyCommunityDementiaDepression.
Type
Original Papers
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 43 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Wenger, GC. The formation of social networks: self help, mutual aid, and older people in contemporary Britain. Aging Studies 1993; 7(1): 2540.Google Scholar
2.Wenger, GC. The Supportive Network: Coping with Old Age. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1984.Google Scholar
3.Wenger, QC, St Leger, F. Community structure and support network variations. Aging and Society 1992; 1992: 213–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Wenger, GC. Support networks in old age – constructing a typology. In: Jeffreys, M ed. Growing old in the 20th century. London: Routledge 1989; 166–85.Google Scholar
5.Bulmer, M. Neighbours: The work of Philip Abrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
6.National Council on Ageing and Older People, Report No. 45. Mental Disorders in Older Irish People: Incidence, Prevalence and Treatment (Keogh F, Roche A.). Dublin: National Council on Ageing and Older People, 1996.Google Scholar
7.National Council on Ageing and Older People, Report No.54. An Action Plan for Dementia (O'Shea E, O'Reilly S.). Dublin: National Council on Ageing and Older People, 1999.Google Scholar
8.Kirby, M, Radic, A, Bruce, I, Coakley, D, Lawlor, BA. Mental disorders among the community-dwelling elderly. Br J Psychiat 1997; 1997: 369–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Copeiand, JRM, Dewey, ME, Griffiths-Jones, HM. A computerised psychiatric diagnostic system and case nomenclature for elderly subjects: GMS and AGECAT. Psychol Med 1986; 1986: 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn) (DSM-III). Washington DC, 1980: APA.Google Scholar
11.Copeiand, KM, Dewey, ME, Griffiths-Jones, HM. Dementia and depression in elderly persons: AQECAT compared with DSM-III and pervasive illness. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1990: 5; 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Wenger, GC. A network typology: from theory to practice. J Aging Studies 1991; 5(2): 147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Wenger, GC. A comparison of urban and rural support networks: Liverpool and North Wales. Aging and Society 1995; 15: 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Wenger, GC. Support networks and dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1994; 9: 181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Wenger, GC. Dementia sufferers living at home. Int J Geriatr Psychiat 1994; 9: 721–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Badger, F, Evers, H, Cameron, E. Community service provision and clients with dementia. Community Care Project Paper No. 29. Health Services Research Centre, University of Birmingham, 1989.Google Scholar
17.Wenger, GC. Change and adaptation in informal support networks of elderly people in Wales 1979-1987. J Aging Studies 1990; 4(4): 375–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Cornwell, J. Hard-earned lives: accounts of health and illness from East London. London: Tavistock, 1984.Google Scholar
19.Levin, E, Sinclair, I, Gorbach, P. Respite services for the carers of confused elderly people. London: National Institute for Social Work Research Unit, 1989.Google Scholar
20.Wenger, GC, Davies, R, Shahtahmasebi, S. Morale in old age: refining the model. Int J Geriatr Psychiat 1995; 10: 933–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Copeiand, JRM, Gurland, BJ. Dewey, ME, Kelleher, MJ, Smith, AMR, Davidson, IA. Is there more dementia, depression and neurosis in New York? A comparative study of the elderly in New York and London using the computer diagnosis AGECAT. Br I Psychiat 1987; 151: 466–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar