Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:50:31.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of a cognitive stimulation therapy programme for people with dementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Robert F Coen ,
Bronagh Flynn ,
Edel Rigney ,
Elaine O'Connor ,
Liza Fitzgerald ,
Ciaran Murray ,
Catherine Dunleavy ,
Mindy McDonald ,
Deirdre Delaney  and
Niamh Merriman
...Show all authors
Robert F Coen*
Affiliation:
Mercer's Institute For Research On Ageing, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8
Bronagh Flynn
Affiliation:
Occupational Therapy Dept, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8
Edel Rigney
Affiliation:
Occupational Therapy Dept, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8
Elaine O'Connor
Affiliation:
Occupational Therapy Dept, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8
Liza Fitzgerald
Affiliation:
Occupational Therapy Dept, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8
Ciaran Murray
Affiliation:
Occupational Therapy Dept, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8
Catherine Dunleavy
Affiliation:
Tara Winthrop Private Nursing Home, Dublin
Mindy McDonald
Affiliation:
Tara Winthrop Private Nursing Home, Dublin
Deirdre Delaney
Affiliation:
Psychology Dept, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9
Niamh Merriman
Affiliation:
Occupational TherapyDept, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8
Jennifer Edgeworth
Affiliation:
Psychology Dept, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland
*
*Correspondence Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: Cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) has been shown to produce improvements in cognition and quality of life which compare favourably with trials of cholinesterase inhibitors. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of CST, replicating the methods of Spector et al in the British Journal of Psychiatry in 2003 in a smaller sample using a control group engaged in routine activities.

Methods: Eligible participants (mild to moderate dementia; MMSE range 10-23) were randomised to CST group or control conditions. Pre- and post-intervention testing was undertaken by assessors who were blind to condition. Measures included MMSE, CDR (sum of boxes), ADAS-cog, RAID (anxiety), abbreviated GDS (depression), QoL-AD, and the CAPE Behaviour Rating Scale (BRS). Analysis was by non-parametric statistics. Occupational therapists facilitated two sessions per week for seven weeks in two long-term care facilities and the same programme was run by the activity co-ordinator in a nursing home unit.

Results: Fourteen CST and 13 control participants completed the study. Between group difference scores analysis showed that the CST group improved compared to controls on MMSE (Mann-Whitney U = 32, p = 0.013) and on the QoL-AD which just fell short of significant (U=51.5, p = 0.055). Qualitatively, therapists noted that CST participants demonstrated good interaction and enthusiasm in the group environment, with continuity and carryover between sessions.

Conclusions: Even though the sample sizes are small the current study is consistent with the Spector et al's findings in 2003 of beneficial effects in people with dementia following CST. The programme is recommended as an intervention for people with mild to moderate dementia.

Type
Brief Reports
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 145 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Spector, A, Orrell, M. A Review of the use of cognitive stimulation therapy in dementia management. Br J Neurosci Nursing 2006; 2(8): 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Farinamd, E, Mantovani, F, Fioravanti, R, et al.Evaluating two group programmes of cognitive training in mild -to-moderate AD: Is there any difference between a “global” stimulation and a “cognitive-specific” one?. Aging Mental Health 2006; 10(3): 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Moniz-Cook, E. Cognitive stimulation and dementia; Aging & Mental Health 2006; 10(3): 207–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Woods, B, Thorgrimsen, L, Spector, A, et al.Improved quality of life and cognitive stimulation therapy in dementia. Aging Mental Health 2006; 10(3): 219–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Acevedo, A, Lowenstein, DA. Nonpharmacological Cognitive Interventions in Aging and Dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurology 2007; (20)4: 239–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Onder, G, Zanetti, O, Giacobini, Eet al.Reality orientation therapy combined with cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's Disease: randomised control trial. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 187: 450–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Matsuda, O. Cognitive stimulation therapy for Alzheimer's disease: the effect of cognitive stimulation therapy on the progression of mild Alzheimer's disease in patients treated with donepezil. Int Psychogeriatr 2007; 19: 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE clinical guideline 42. Dementia: Supporting people with dementia and their carers in health and social care. NICE-SCIE guideline 2006; pg 29.Google Scholar
9.Health Information and Quality Authority. National Quality Standards for Residential Care Settings for Older People in Ireland. Health Information and Quality Authority 2008; pg 58.Google Scholar
10.Breuil, V, De Rotrou, J, Forette, Fet al.Cognitive stimulation of patients with dementia: preliminatry results. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1994; 9: 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Spector, A, Thorgrimsen, L, Woods, Bet al.Efficacy of an evidence-based cognitive stimulation therapy programme for people with dementia: randomised control trial. Br J Psychiatry 2003; 183: 248–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Spector, A, Thorgrimsen, L, Woods, Bet al.Making a Difference: An Evidence-Based Group Programme to Offer Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) to People with Dementia. The Manual for Group Leaders. UK: Hawker Publications, 2006.Google Scholar
13.Knapp, M, Thorgrimsen, L, Patel, Aet al.Cognitive stimulation therapy programme for people with dementia: Cost effectiveness analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2006; 188: 574–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Folstein, MF, Folstein, SE, McHugh, PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12(3):189–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Sheikh, J, Yesavage, J. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontologist 1986; 5: 169–173.Google Scholar
16.Rosen, WG, Mohs, R, Davis, KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry 1984; 141: 1356–1364.Google ScholarPubMed
17.Logsdon, R, Gibbons, LE, McCurry, SMet al.Quality of life ibn Alzheimer's disease: patient and caregiver reports. J Mental Health Aging 1999; 5: 21–32.Google Scholar
18.Pattie, AH, Gilleard, CJ. Clifton Assessment Procedures for the Eldely (CAPE). Sevenoaks: Hodder & Stoughton, 1979.Google Scholar
19.Morris, JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology 1993; 43: 2412–2414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Shankar, K, Walker, M, Frost, Det al.The development of a valid and reliable scale for anxiety in dementia. Aging Mental Health 1999; 3: 39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Stuss, DT, Meiran, N, Guzman, DAet al.Do long tests yield a more accurate diagnosis of dementia than shorter tests? A comparison of 5 neuropsychological tests. Arch Neurol 1996; 53: 1033–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Orrell, M, Spector, A, Thorgrimsen, L, et al.A pilot study examining the effectiveness of maintenance Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (MCST) for people with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005; 20: 246–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed