No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
ECT – Irish national studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 June 2014
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Letters to the Editor
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
References
1.Enriquez, S, Tighe, S, Fitzgibbon, Net al.Five years of ECT: the relationship between consent status and treatment experiences. Ir J Psych Med 2010; 27(3): 117–122CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Latey, RH, Fahy, TJ. Electroconvulsive therapy in the Republic of Ireland: a summary of findings. Br J Psychiat 1985; 147: 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Fahy, TJ, Latey, RH. Short term course and outcome of patients treated with ECT: Irish and British surveys compared. Convulsive Therapy (now J ECT) 1987; 3: 210–217.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Latey, RH and Fahy, TJ. Some influences on regional variation in frequency of prescription of ECT. Br J Psychiatry 1988; 152: 196–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Electroconvulsive Therapy in the Republic of Ireland, 1982. A Report to the Irish Division, Royal College of Psychiatrists. By Latey RH and Fahy TJ. Galway University Press. ISBN 0,90775,10,1 (Available in medical libraries at Trinity College, Dublin, University College, Cork, Cambridge medical school and Royal College of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
6.The Mental Health Commission of Ireland (2009): report on electroconvulsive therapy in approved centres in 2008.Google Scholar
7.Semkovska, M and McLoughlin, DM. Objective cognitive performance associated with electroconvulsive therapy for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 68(6): 568–577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Bayless, JD, McCormick, LM, Brumm, MCet al.Pre- and post-electroconvulsive therapy multidomain cognitive assessment in psychotic depression: relationship to premorbid abilities and symptom improvement. J ECT 2010; 26(1): 47–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
You have
Access