Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T14:20:48.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Counter-urbanisation during Ireland's ‘Celtic Tiger’ period – mental health implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Olabisi Owoeye
Affiliation:
Cavan Monaghan Mental Health Service, St Davnet's Hospital, Monaghan, Co Monaghan, Ireland
Manzar Khawaja
Affiliation:
General Adult Psychiatry, St Davnet's Hospital, Monaghan, Co Monaghan, Ireland
Anthony Kinsella
Affiliation:
MCT, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
Vincent Russell
Affiliation:
Cavan Monaghan Mental Health Service, St Davnet's Hospital, Monaghan, Co Monaghan, Ireland

Abstract

Objectives: This study (a) describes the clinical and demographic profile of urban to rural migrants attending a psychiatric outpatient clinic and (b) explores the impact of the move on patients' mental health and lifestyle.

Methods: A self-rated questionnaire distributed to 207 consecutive outpatients requested demographic and clinical information from migrant and non-migrant patients. A focus group study among a purposeful sample of 10 migrant patients explored participants perceptions of the move and its impact on mental health.

Results: One hundred and one patients (48.8%) returned the questionnaire. Most migrant responders described housing affordability as influencing their decision and were generally satisfied with the move. However, half reported reduced access to social amenities. Over half of the migrant outpatients had a previous psychiatric history and were mostly unemployed despite being home-owners. Predominant focus group themes included the perceived need to leave the city for the relative safety and calm of rural living as well as post-migration concerns regarding future isolation and diminished levels of support.

Conclusion: Clinicians and service providers in rural areas should be informed by an awareness of the potential mental health implications of counter-urbanisation.

Type
Original papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Smith, D. The changing faces of rural populations: re-fixing the gaze or “eyes wide shut”? J Rural Studies 2007; 23(3): 275282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Gray, J. The common agricultural policy and the reinvention of the rural in the European Community. Sociologica Ruralis 2000; 40: 3052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Champion, A. Studying Counterurbanisation and the Population Turn-around. In: Boyle, P, Halfacree, K (Eds). Migration into Rural Areas. Theories and Issues. Wiley, Chichester, 1998: 2140.Google Scholar
4.Fielding, T. Counterurbanisation and Social Class, In: Boyle, P, Halfacree, K (Eds). Migration into Rural Areas. Theories and Issues. Wiley, Chichester, 1998: 4160.Google Scholar
5.Fielding, AJ. Migration and Urbanization in Western Europe since 1950. The Geograph J 1989; 155: 6069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kontuly, T. Contrasting the Counterurbanisation Experience in European Nations. In: Boyle, P, Halfacree, K (Eds). Migration into Rural Areas. Theories and Issues. Wiley, Chichester, 1998: 6178.Google Scholar
7.Halfacree, K, Boyle, P. Migration, rurality and the post- productivist countryside. In:n: In: Boyle, P, Halfacree, K (Eds). Migration into Rural Areas. Theories and Issues. Wiley, Chichester, 1998: 120.Google Scholar
8.Van Dam, F, Heins, S, Elbersen, B. Lay Discourses of the Rural and Stated and Revealed Preferences for Rural Living. Some Evidence of the Existence of a Rural Idyll in the Netherlands. J Rural Studies 2002; 18: 464476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Heins, S. Rurale Woonmilieus in Stad En Land. Plattelandsbeelden, Vraag Naar En Aanbod van Rurale Woonmilieus (Rural Residential Environments in City and Countryside. Countryside Images, Demand for and Supply of Rural Residential Environments), Eburon, Delft, 2002Google Scholar
10.Korcelli, P. Migration and residential mobility in the Warsaw region. In: Weesep, JV, Korcelli, P (Eds). Residential Mobility and Social Change: Studies from Poland and the Netherlands, Amsterdam-Utrecht. KNAG Nederlandse Geografische Studies hr. 106. 1990Google Scholar
11.Bartley, B, Kitchin, R (Eds.) Understanding Contemporary Ireland, Dublin: Pluto Press, 2007Google Scholar
12.Scott, M. Strategic Spatial Planning and contested ruralities: insights from the Republic of Ireland. European Planning Studies 2006; 14(6): 811829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. CSO Census 2006 Principal Demographic Results, 2007Google Scholar
14.Gkartzios, M, Scott, M. Residential mobilities and house-building in rural Ireland: Evidence from three case studies. Sociologia Ruralis 2010; 50(1): 6484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Gkartzios, M, Scott, M. Countering counterurbanisation: Spatial planning challenges in a dispersed city region, the Greater Dublin Area. Town Planning Review 2010; 81(1): 2354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Short, JR. Imagined Country. Society, Culture and Environment: Routledge, London. 1991Google Scholar
17.Mulder, CH. Migration Dynamics: A Life Course Approach, Amsterdam: Thesis. 1993Google Scholar
18.Bhugra, D, Jones, P. Migration and mental illness. Adv. Psychiatric Treat. 2002; 7: 216–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Kennedy, N, Jerrard-Dunne, P, Gill, Met al.Characteristics and treatment of asylum seekers reviewed by psychiatrists in an Irish inner city area. Ir J Psych Med 2002; 19: 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Burman, E. Interviewing. In: Banister, Pet al (Eds). Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Research Guide. Buckingham: Open University Press. 1994Google Scholar