Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:51:40.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of referrals from primary and secondary care to CMHT psychologists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Louise Curtis  and
Michael Byrne
Louise Curtis
Affiliation:
St. Patrick's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Michael Byrne*
Affiliation:
Roscommon PCCC, HSE, Ireland
*
*Correspondence E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To explore whether (direct) referrals from GPs to two Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) clinical psychologists differed from those received from both ‘Psychiatric’ (eg. consultant psychiatrists) and ‘Other’ sources.

Method:

The two psychologists retrospectively examined and coded the case files of all clients who attended them during a 12-month period. The six measures used were diagnostic prevalence and groups, co-morbidity, chronicity, previous hospital admission and CMHT contact Separate cross-tabulations and chi squared tests were conducted for the various dependent variables to profile differences across the three referral sources.

Results:

There was no difference in prevalence of Axis I disorders, co-morbidity and chronicity of disorders between ‘GP’ and ‘Psychiatric’ referrals to the two CMHT psychologists. However, although low in number, there were more eating and psychotic disorders among the ‘Psychiatric’ referrals, and more of these referrals had previous hospital admission and CMHT contact.

Conclusions:

‘GP’ referrals were similar to ‘Psychiatric’ referrals on some measures but differed on others. Hence, as to whether an ‘open access’ model of (direct) referral to CMHT clinical psychologists lowers the clinical threshold for referrals depends on which measures are deemed most critical. Consistently applying a composite index of referral ‘severity’ could prevent the former.

Keywords

Primary careGeneral PractitionerClinical psychologyMental health servicesPathwayReferral eligibility criteria
Type
Brief report
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 73 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Singleton, N, Bumpstead, R, O'Brien, Met al.Psychiatric Morbidity among Adults Living in Private Households. London: Office for National Statistics, 2000.Google Scholar
2.Goldberg, D. The management of anxious depression in primary care. J ClinPsychiatry 1999; 60:43–4.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Copty, M, Whitford, DL. Mental health in general practice: assessment ofcurrent state and future needs. Ir J Psych Med 2005; 22(3): 83–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Department of Health and Children. A Vision for Change. Dublin, Stationery Office, 2006.Google Scholar
5.Health Service Executive. Transformation Programme 2007-2010. Naas: HSE, 2006.Google Scholar
6.Shepherd, M. Involving psychologists, counsellors and referrers in the systematic development of consensus-based referral criteria for a primary care psychology and counselling service. Clin Psychology 2003; 21: 39–43.Google Scholar
7.Hodges, B, Inch, C. Silver, I. Improving the psychiatric knowledge, skills, and attitudes of primary care physicians, 1950-2000: a review. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158: 1579–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Goldberg, D, Huxley, P. Mental Illness in the Community: the Pathway to Psychiatric Care. London, Tavistock: 1980.Google Scholar
9.Royal College of Psychiatrists. Roles and Responsibilities of a Consultant in General Psychiatry. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2001.Google Scholar
10.Byrne, M, Lee, M, McAuliffe, E. Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) member perceptions of CMHT working. J of Interprofessional Care 2009; 23Google Scholar
11.Greenwood, N, Chisholm, B, Burns, T, Harvey, K. Communitymental health team caseloads and diagnostic case mix. Psychiatric Bull 2000; 24(8): 290–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Department of Health. Mental Health Policy Implementation Guide: Community Mental Health Teams. Department of Health Publications, 2002.Google Scholar
13.Forsythe, A, Gallagher, M. An audit of an Adult Mental Health caseload inNorthern Ireland. Clin Psychology 2003; 22: 29–34.Google Scholar
14.England, E. Lester, H. Integrated mental health services in England: a policy paradox Int J Integrated Care 2005; 5: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Byrne, M. A response to the Mental Health Commission's discussion paper 'Multidisciplinary Team Working: From Theory to Practice. The Ir Psychologist 2006c; 32(12):323–39.Google Scholar
16.Annual Report 2004. Dublin: Mental Health Commission, 2005.Google Scholar
17.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders – fourth edition (DSM-IV). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.Google Scholar
18.Cohen, A, Singh, S, Hague, J. The Primary Guide to Managing Severe Mental Illness. London, Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health: 2004.Google Scholar
19.Scott, J, McCluskey, S, Smith, L. Three months in the life of a community mental health team. Psychiatric Bull 1994; 18:615–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Burns, T. Community Mental Health Teams: A Guide to Current Practice. Oxford: University of Oxford, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Upson, P, Wright, J. Self-referrals: another outbreak of the ‘worriedwell’? Clin Psychology Forum 1999; 134: 18–21.Google Scholar
22.Tata, P, Eagle, A. Green, J. Does providing more accessible primary care psychology services lower the clinical thresholds for referrals Br J Gen Practice 1996; 46: 469–72.Google ScholarPubMed
23.Hannigan, B. Joint working in community mental health: Prospects and challenges. Health Social Care in the Community 1999; 7(1): 25–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed