Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:04:02.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cogito ergo sum? – refocusing dementia ethics in a hypercognitive society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Desmond O'Neill
Desmond O'Neill*
Affiliation:
Consultant in Geriatric Medicine, Age-Related Health Care, Adelaide and Meath Hospital Dublin incorporating the National Children's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 1997 , pp. 121 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

References

1.Rice, DP, Fox, PJ, Max, Wet al.The economic burden of Alzheimer's disease care. Health Affairs 1993; 12: 164–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Jones, RG. Ethical and legal issues in the care of demented people. Rev Clin Gerontol 1997; 7: 147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Post, SG. The moral challenge of Alzheimer disease. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
4.Karlawish, JHT, Sachs, G. Research on the cognitively impaired: lessons and warnings from the emergency research debate. J American Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 474–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Muller-Hill, B. Murderous science: elimination by scientific selection of Jews, Gypsies and others (trans. Fraser, G). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
6.Brock, DW. Life and death: philosophical essays in biomedical ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993: 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Dworkin, R. Life's dominion: an argument about abortion, euthanasia and individual freedom. New York: Vintage, 1993: 234.Google Scholar
8.Kitwood, T. The experience of dementia. Aging and Mental Health 1997; 1: 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Bahro, M, Silber, E, Sunderland, T. How do patients with Alzheimer's disease cope with their illness? – a clinical experience report. J American Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 41–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Kitwood, T, Bredin, K. Towards a theory of dementia care: personhood and well-being. Ageing and Society 1992; 12: 269–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Teri, L, Logsdon, R. Identifying pleasant activities for Alzheimer's disease patients: the Pleasant Event Schedule – AD. Gerontologist 1991; 31: 413–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Cassell, CK, Jameton, AL. Dementia in the elderly: an analysis of medical responsibility. Annals of Internal Medicine 1981; 94: 802–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.American Academy of Neurology Ethics and Humanities Subcommittee. Ethical issues in the management of the demented patient. Neurology 1996; 46: 1180–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Maguire, C, Kirby, M, Coen, R, Lawlor, B, Coakley, D, O'Neill, D. Family members' attitudes toward telling the patient with Alzheimer's disease their, diagnosis. BMJ 1996; 313: 529–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Holroyd, S, Snustad, DG, Chalfoux, ZL. Attitudes of older adults on being told the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. J American Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 400–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Bernat, JL. Ethical issues in neurology. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994.Google Scholar
17.Ely, M, Brayne, C, Huppert, FA, O'Connor, DW, Pollitt, PA. Cognitive impairment: a challenge for community care. A comparison of the domiciliary service receipt of cognitively impaired and equally dependent physically impaired elderly women. Age Ageing 1997; 26: 301–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Rosenfeld, KE, Pearlman, RA. Allocating medical resources: recommendations for a professional response. J American Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 886–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Norberg, A. Ethics in the care of the elderly with dementia. In: Gillon, R, ed. Principles of Health Care Ethics. Chichester: Wiley, 1994: 721–32.Google Scholar
20.Post, SG, Whitehouse, P. Fairhill guidelines on ethics and the care of people with Alzheimer disease. In: Post, SG. The moral challenge of Alzheimer disease. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995: 62–80.Google Scholar
21.Post, SG. Behaviour control and Alzheimer disease in perspective. Alzheimer Dis and Rel Disord 1992; 6: 73–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Cassell, CK, Hays, JR, Lynn, J. Alzheimer's: decisions in terminal care. Patient Care 1991; 25: 125–34.Google Scholar
23.Seckler, AB, Meier, DE, Mulvihill, M, Cammer Paris, BE. Substituted judgment: how reliable are proxy predictions? Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 92–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.O'Brien, LA, Grisso, JA, Maislin, Get al.Nursing home residents' preferences for life-sustaining treatment. JAMA 1995; 274: 1775–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Covinsky, KE, Landefeld, CS, Teno, J, Connors, AF, Dawson, N, Youngner, Set al.Is economic hardship on the families of the seriously ill associated with patient and surrogate care preferences? Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 1737–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Wenger, NS, Pearson, ML, Desmond, KAet al.Epidemiology of do-not-resuscitate orders. Arch Intern Med 1996; 155: 2056–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Janofsky, JS, McCarthy, RJ, Folstein, MF. The Hopkins Competency Assessment Test: a brief method for evaluating patients' capacity to give infotmed consent. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1992; 43: 132–6.Google Scholar
28.Molloy, DW, Silberfield, M, Darzins, P, Guyatt, GH, Singer, PA, Rush, Bet al.Measuring capacity to complete an advance directive. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 660–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Glass, KC, Silberfeld, M. Determination of competence. In: Gauthier, S ed. Clinical diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease. London: Martin Dunitz, 1996.Google Scholar
30.Marson, DC, McInturff, B, Hawkins, L, Bartolucci, A, Harrell, L. Journal Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 453–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Miller, TE, Coleman, CH, Cugliari, AM. Treatment decisions for patients without surrogates: rethinking policies for a vulnerable population. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 369–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Lynch, J. In the Matter of a Ward of Court. Dublin: High Court, 1996 (05 5).Google Scholar
33.Berghmans, R. Ethical hazards of the substituted judgement test in decision making concerning the end of life of dementia patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1997; 12: 283–7.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Pellegrino, ED, Thomasma, DC. For the patient's good: the restoration of beneficence in health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
35.Alemayehu, E, Molloy, DW, Guyatt, GH, Singer, J, Penington, Get al.Variability in physician's decisions on caring for chronically ill elderly patients: an international study. Can Med Assoc J 1991; 144: 1133–8.Google ScholarPubMed
36.Teno, J, Lynn, J, Connors, AF, Wenger, N, Phillips, RS, Alzola, Cet al.The illusion of end-of-life resource savings with advance directives. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 513–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Volicer, L, Rheaume, Y, Brown, J, Fabiszewski, K, Brady, R. Hospice approach to the treatment of patients with advanced dementia of the Alzheimer type. J Am Med Assoc 1986; 256: 2210–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Ackerman, TF. The moral implications of medical uncertainty: tube feeding demented patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 1265–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Weatherall, DG. Teaching ethics to medical students. J Med Ethics 1995; 21: 133–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed