Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:46:06.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinical predictors of involuntary detention among voluntary inpatients in St Patrick’s University Hospital (SPUH)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2015

B. Masood ,
S. O’Ceallaigh ,
T. Thekiso ,
M. Nichol ,
P. Kowalska-Beda ,
M. Murphy ,
J. Creedon ,
T. Maher ,
D. McLoughlin  and
N. Kennedy
B. Masood
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St Patrick’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
S. O’Ceallaigh
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St Patrick’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
T. Thekiso
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St Patrick’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
M. Nichol
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St Patrick’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
P. Kowalska-Beda
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St Patrick’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
M. Murphy
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St Patrick’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland Department of Psychiatry, St. Edmundsbury Hospital, Lucan, Ireland
J. Creedon
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St Patrick’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
T. Maher
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St Patrick’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
D. McLoughlin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St Patrick’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland Dublin University, Dublin, Ireland
N. Kennedy*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St Patrick’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland Department of Psychiatry, St. Edmundsbury Hospital, Lucan, Ireland Dublin University, Dublin, Ireland
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr N. Kennedy, Department of Psychiatry, St Patrick’s University Hospital, Dublin 8, Co. Dublin, Ireland. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Few studies have described clinical characteristics of patients subject to an involuntary detention in an Irish context. The Irish Mental Health Act 2001 makes provision under Section 23(1), whereby a person who has voluntary admission status can be detained.

Aims

This study aimed to describe all involuntary admissions to St Patrick’s University Hospital (SPUH) (2011–2013) and to evaluate clinical characteristics of voluntary patients who underwent Mental Health Act assessment during 2011 to determine differences in those who had involuntary admission orders completed and those who did not.

Methods

All uses of Mental Health Act 2001 within SPUH 2011–2013 were identified. All uses of Section 23(1) during 2011 were reviewed and relevant documents/case-notes examined using a pro forma covering clinical data, factors recognized to influence involuntary admissions and validated scales were used to determine diagnoses, insight, suicide and violence risk.

Results

Over 2011–2013, 2.5–3.8% of all admissions were involuntary with more detained after use of Section 23(1) than Section 14(2). The majority of initiations of Section 23(1) did not result in an involuntary admission (72%), occurred out of hours (52%) and many occurred early after admission (<1 week, 43%). Initiation of Section 23(1) by a consultant psychiatrist (p=0.001), suicide risk (p=0.03) and lack of patient insight into treatment (p=0.007) predicted conversion to involuntary admission.

Conclusion

This study predicts a role for patient insight, suicide risk and consultant psychiatrist decision making in the initiation of Mental Health Act assessment of voluntary patients. Further data describing the involuntary admissions process in an Irish setting are needed.

Keywords

Capacityinsightinvoluntary detentioninvoluntary detention predictorsIrish Mental Health Act 2001
Type
Original Research
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 13 - 18
Copyright
© College of Psychiatrists of Ireland 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appelbaum, P (1995). Civil commitment and liability for violating patients’ rights. Psychiatric Services 46, 17–18.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, PS, Hamm, RM (1982). Decision to seek commitment: psychiatric decision making in a legal context. Archives of General Psychiatry 39, 447–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, RA (2007). Psychiatrists’ opinions about involuntary civil commitment: results of a national survey. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 35, 19–28.Google Scholar
Brown, J, Rayne, JT (1989). Some ethical considerations in defensive psychiatry: a case study. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 59, 534–541.Google Scholar
Craddock, M, Asherson, P, Owens, MJ, Williams, J, McGuffin, P, Farmer, AE (1996). Concurrent validity of the OPCRIT diagnostic system. Comparison of OPCRIT diagnoses with consensus best-estimate lifetime diagnoses. British Journal of Psychiatry 169, 58–63.Google Scholar
Crisis Prevention Institute (2011). Participant Workbook. Nonviolent Crisis Intervention: A CPI Specialised Offering. CPI: USA.Google Scholar
David, AS (1990). Insight and psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry 156, 798–808.Google Scholar
Dunne, E, Moloney, E (2012). Study of presentations for involuntary admission to a Cork approved centre. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 29, 16–21.Google Scholar
Gardner, W, Lidz, CW, Hoge, SK, Monahan J, Eisenberg MM, Bennett NS, Mulvey EP, Roth LH (1999). Patients’ revisions of their beliefs about the need for hospitalization. American Journal of Psychiatry 156, 1385–1391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grisso, T, Appelbaum, PS (1998). Abilities related to competence. In Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals, Chapter 3, pp 31–60. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Health Research Board (2010). Irish psychiatric units and hospital census (www.hrb.ie). Accessed 2014.Google Scholar
Kelly, B, Haskard, Z, Di Matteo, MR (2009). Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a metaanalysis. Medical Care 47, 826–834.Google Scholar
Knapp, S, Vande Creek, L (1997). A review of tort liability in involuntary civil commitment. Hospital & Community Psychiatry 38, 648–651.Google Scholar
Langle, G, Renner, G, Gunther, A (2003). Psychiatric commitment: patients’ perspectives. Medicine and Law 22, 39–53.Google Scholar
Litwack, TR (1994). Assessments of dangerousness: legal, research, and clinical developments. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 21 (Special Issue: Mental Health Law): 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchins, D, Cooper, AE, Hanrahan, P, Rasinski, K (2004). Psychiatrists’ attitudes towards involuntary hospitalization. Psychiatric Services 55, 1058–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mental Health Act (2001). Office of the Attorney General, Ireland (http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/2001/en/act/pub/0025). Accessed 2014.Google Scholar
Mental Health Commission (2006). Quality Framework for Mental Health Services in Ireland. Mental Health Commission: Ireland.Google Scholar
Mental Health Commission (2007–2013). Annual reports 2007 to 2013. Mental Health Commission. Ireland (www.mhirl.ie). Accessed 2014.Google Scholar
Moran, P, Morvin, L, Tennyson, L, Walters, P, Thornicroft, G (2003). Standardised Assessment of Personality – Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS): preliminary validation of a brief screen for personality disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry 183, 228–232.Google Scholar
O’Donoghue, B, Lyne, J, Hill, M, O’Rourke L, Daly S, Larkin C, Feeney L, O’Callaghan E (2011). Perceptions of involuntary admission and risk of subsequent readmission at one-year follow-up: the influence of insight and recovery style. Journal of Mental Health 20, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sattar, SP, Pinals, DA, Din, AU, Appelbaum, PS (2006). To commit or not to commit: the psychiatry resident as a variable in involuntary commitment decisions. Academic Psychiatry 30, 191–195.Google Scholar
Tan, JAO, Doll, HA, Fitzpatrick, R, et al. (2008). Psychiatrists’ attitudes towards autonomy, best interests and compulsory treatment in anorexia nervosa: a questionnaire survey. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2, 40.Google Scholar