Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:52:59.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prescription chart writing practices in an acute psychiatric unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Oluwatosin Akinsola*
Affiliation:
Thomas Embling Hospital, Victoria, Australia
Kingsley Nwachukwu
Affiliation:
Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland
Annette Kavanagh
Affiliation:
Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland
*
*Correspondence Email: [email protected].

Abstract

Objectives: The survey was designed to evaluate the current prescribing practice of the doctors in our local psychiatric unit against the standards outlined by the National Health Office in the Code of Practice for Healthcare Records Management, and to assess the changes in practice by completing an audit cycle.

Method: The survey was carried out in a 27 bed acute psychiatric unit. A single assessor reviewed 51 inpatient drug prescription charts using a standardised data collection form derived from the Code of Practice document. Results were presented to the relevant clinical staff and a repeat survey was conducted a few months afterwards. All data were categorical and the frequencies were computed using SPSS 13.0.

Results: A total of 51 medication prescription charts were analysed on each occasion during the period of the study. The information contained on the drug charts were assessed against explicit predefined criteria as per the approved standard. At the initial survey, allergy documentation was absent in 59% of charts, only 18% of charts had generic only prescriptions, 90% of ‘as required’ medication lacked review dates, and only 33% of charts were considered to be reasonably neat. The repeat survey showed improvements in these practices, generic only prescribing increased to 39%, and 55% of charts were considered to be reasonably neat by the assessor.

Conclusion: Our study has identified deficiencies in prescribing practices and we have shown improvement in some of these practices at the repeat survey, however, further improvement is required. Given that the non-consultant hospital doctors are mostly involved in prescribing on drug charts, approved standards should be incorporated into the induction programme at the commencement of training in this unit. This standard should be monitored and maintained through the means of regular audits.

Type
Brief Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.United States Food and Drug Administration. Savings from generic drugs purchased at retail pharmacies. May 2004. www.fda.gov/cder/consumerinfo/savingsfromgenericdrugs.htmGoogle Scholar
2.Bates, DW, Cullen, DJ, Laird, N.Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug event; Implications for prevention. JAMA 1995; 274: 2934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Ferner, RE, Upton, D.Errors in prescribing, supplying and giving medicines. Prescribers' J 1999; 39: 2934Google Scholar
4.Department of Health. South Birmingham Mental Health NHS Trust regulations for prescribing, handling, custody and administration of drugs 1998.Google Scholar
5.British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. British National Formulary. May 1999.Google Scholar
6.National Hospitals Office. Code of Practice for Healthcare Records Management. June 2007Google Scholar
7.Mental Health Commission. Activity and Catchment Area Characteristics. May 2006.Google Scholar