Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T08:32:38.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Groupwork with HIV positive drug misusers in prison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Julian Pugh
Julian Pugh*
Affiliation:
Probation and Welfare Service, Smithfield Chambers, Smithfield, Dublin 7, Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective: The groupwork programme in this study sought to engage HIV positive drug misusers within a prison setting in order to introduce ideas and information, and by so doing promote desired behavioural changes in terms of risk behaviour and drug addiction. Such an effort was also seen as a strategy to help prisoners cope with imprisonment and to prepare them for the demands that they might face following release.

Method: Various methods of giving information and discussion were employed in order to influence members' views and behaviour. The interactions between group members were recorded using a modified version of Bale's Interaction Process Analysis Instrument during each session. In this way it was possible to analyse individual member's functioning as well as that of the whole group over the duration of the programme.

Results: While significant changes in members' views and behaviour could not be proven, an analysis of the group's communication, control, evaluation and decision making profiles reflected effort and engagement in tackling the subject inputs. Analysis of individual member's contributions was, however, open to more speculative interpretation.

Conclusion: The positive response from group members, combined with an analysis of the results suggests that the approach adopted in the programme was an encouraging step in devising an acceptable and relevant educational and treatment strategy in dealing with this usually reluctant client group, many of whom are unresponsive to traditional treatment methods.

Keywords

HIVAIDSPrisonOpiate abusersHeroin misusersGroupworkProbation
Type
Research Article
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 12 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Annual report on prisons and places of detention. Dublin: Dublin Stationery Office, 1986.Google Scholar
2.Report of the Advisory Committee on Communicable diseases in prison. Dublin: publin Stationery Office, 1993.Google Scholar
3.Council of Europe, recommendation No. R(93)6, concerning prison and the criminological aspects of the control of transmissible diseases including AIDS and related health problems in prison.Google Scholar
4.Carvel, ALM, Hart, GJ. Risk behaviours for HIV infection among drug users in prison. BMJ 1990; 300: 1383–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Skoler, DL, Dargan, RL. AIDS in prisons, administrator policies, inmate protests and reactions from the Federal Bench. Federal Probation 1990; LIV:,2.Google Scholar
6.Murphy, I. HIV and drug treatment: issues and policies. AIDS Inform 1990; 2:1.Google Scholar
7.Pearson, G, Gilman, M, Mclvers, S. Young people and heroin: an examination of heroin use in Northern England: a report to the Health Education Council. London: Gower, 1987.Google Scholar
8.Madden, A, Swinton, M, Gunn, J. Women in prison and use of illicit drugs before arrest. BMJ 1990, 301:1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Madden, A, Swinton, M, Gunn, J. Drug dependence in prisoners. BMJ 1991; 302:880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Home Office. Policy statement on the through care of drug misusers in the prison system. London: Home Office Prison Department, 1988.Google Scholar
11.Douglas, T. Groupwork practice. London: Tavistock, 1976.Google Scholar
12.Bales, RF. Interaction process analysis. Reading (MA): Addison-Eesley, 1950.Google Scholar
13.Ross, S, Thorpe, A. Programming skills in groupwork. Groupwork 1988; 2.Google Scholar
14. Checking out facts and feelings quiz on HIV and AIDS. Unknown Australian source.Google Scholar
15.Preston-Shoot, A. A model for evaluating groupwork. Groupwork 1988; 2.Google Scholar
16.Bownes, IT, O'Gorman, EC, Dinsmore, WW. Factors influencing perception of risk of HIV acquisition among male heterosexual STD clinic attenders. Ir J Psychol Med 1990; 7: 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Donovan, J. We don't buy sickness, it just comes. London: Gower, 1988.Google Scholar
18.Alcorn, K. Illness, metaphor and AIDS. In: Aggleton, PJ, Homans, H, eds. Social aspects of AIDS. London: Falmer Press, 1988.Google Scholar
19.Schutz, WC. FIRO: A three dimensional theory of interpersonal operations. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston; 1958.Google Scholar
20.McKeagney, N. Being positive: drug injectors experience of HIV infection. Glasgow: University of Glasgow Department of Child Health and Obstetrics, 1989.Google Scholar