Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 March 2016
When John Bramhall arrived on the shores of Ireland in 1633 to begin his new job as chaplain to the (also newly appointed) lord deputy, Thomas Wentworth, he was probably not yet forty years old. He immediately set about his role with the type of energy and ruthless devotion that came to characterise the Laudian regime that sent him. As John Morrill has indicated, nothing in the previous reign had prepared the Irish Protestant establishment ‘for the onslaught on their church to be mounted by William Laud.’ Historically, one of the problems with the Laudians is that while it is clear what they did, it is less clear why they did it. Typically, and shrewdly, they did not tend to be verbose concerning their motives.
1 Morrill, John, ‘A very British patriarchy? Ecclesiastical imperialism under the early Stuarts’ in Fletcher, Anthony and Roberts, Philip (eds), Religion, culture and society in early modern Britain (Cambridge, 1994), p. 222.Google Scholar
2 Eliot, T. S., ‘John Bramhall’ in Selected essays (London, 1951), p. 354.Google Scholar
3 Hugh Trevor-Roper, Archbishop Laud (London, 1940), p. 241.Google Scholar
4 Burghclere, Lady, Strafford (2 vols, London, 1931), i, 236.Google Scholar
5 McCafferty, John, ‘John Bramhall and the Church of Ireland in the 1630s’ in Ford, Alan, McGuire, J. I. and Milne, Kenneth (eds), As by law established: the Church of Ireland since the Reformation (Dublin, 1995), pp 100-11;Google Scholar idem, ‘“God bless your free Church of Ireland”: Wentworth, Laud and the Irish convocation of 1634’ in J. F. Merritt (ed.), The political world of Thomas Wentworth, earl of Strafford, 1621–1641 (Cambridge, 1996), pp 187–208.
6 Russell, Conrad, ‘The British problem and the English Civil War’ in History, lxxii (1987), p. 399.Google Scholar
7 Davies, Julian, The Caroline captivity of the Church: Charles I and the remoulding of Anglicanism, 1625–1641 (Oxford, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Morrill, ‘British patriarchy?’, pp 223–7.
9 Kenneth Fincham, ‘The ecclesiastical policies of James I and Charles I’ in idem (ed.), The early Stuart Church, 1603–1642 (London, 1993), p. 49.
10 Ford, Alan, ‘Dependent or independent? The Church of Ireland and its colonial context, 1536–1649’ in The seventeenth century, x, no. 2 (Aug. 1995), p. 174.Google Scholar
11 Scott, William and Bliss, James (eds), The works of the most reverend father in God William Laud… (7 vols, Oxford, 1847-60), vii, 66.Google Scholar
12 Hadden, A. (ed.), The works of John Bramhall … (5 vols, Oxford, 1842-45), i, pp lxxx–lxxxii.Google Scholar
13 Ford, Alan, The Protestant Reformation in Ireland (Dublin, 1997), pp 214-15.Google Scholar
14 Hadden, , Works of Bramhall, ii, 124.Google Scholar
15 Cal. S.P. Ire., 1633–47, pp 31–2.
16 Otto, Rudolf, The idea of the holy : an inquiry into the non-rational factor in the idea of the divine and its relation to the rational, trans. Harvey, J.W. (Oxford, 1925).Google Scholar
17 Hadden, , Works of Bramhall, i, p. v.Google Scholar
18 Ibid.
19 Ibid.
20 Bickley, F., H.M.C. Hastings (London, 1947), iv, 55.Google Scholar
21 Bramhall, to Laud, , 20 Dec. 1634 (T.C.D. MS 1697, paper vi).Google Scholar
22 Lockyer, Roger, The early Stuart Church: a political history, 1603–42 (London, 1989), p. 316.Google Scholar
23 Philips, W.A., The history of the Church of Ireland (3 vols, Oxford, 1933-34), iii, 32.Google Scholar
24 Bramhall, , Works, i, p. vii.Google Scholar
25 Vesey, John, Athanasius Hibernicus (London, 1676), p. 15.Google Scholar
26 Bramhall, , Works, i, p. vii.Google Scholar
27 Vesey, Athanasius Hibernicus, p. 16.
28 McCafferty, John, ‘John Bramhall and the reconstruction of the Church of Ireland, 1633–1641’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar
29 W. E. Collins, ‘John Bramhall’ in idem (ed.), Typical English churchmen from Parker to Maurice (London, 1902 ), p. 91.
30 Vesey, Athanasius Hibernicus, p. 18.
31 McCafferty, ‘Bramhall’, p. 101.
32 The passage of these canons has been well documented elsewhere; see McCafferty, ‘“God bless your free Church of Ireland”’.
33 Capern, Amanda, ‘The Caroline Church: James Ussher and the Irish dimension’ in Historical Journal, xxxix (1996), p. 64.Google Scholar
34 Ussher, to Bramhall, , 27 Oct. 1635 (Huntington Library, San Marino, Calif, MS HA 15950).Google Scholar
35 Some controversy surrounds Ussher’s attitude to the Irish articles after convocation. A. J. Stephens shows that this argument centres on the evidence of Peter Heylin and John Vesey. Both claimed that Ussher and several other Irish bishops required of their ordinands double subscription. However, as Stephens indicates, both authors are relying on Nicholas Bernard, who maintained in his Judgement of James Ussher that this was the case. Bernard’s evidence is often doubtful, and with regard to this rather sensational text must be considered even more untrustworthy. Stephens, A. J., Ms. Book of common prayer (3 vols, London, 1849-50), iii, p. cix.Google Scholar
36 Hardwick, Charles, A history of the articles of religion (London, 1890), p. 186.Google Scholar
37 Margaret, , duchess of Newcastle, The life of William Cavendish, duke of Newcastle (London, 1667), p. 43.Google Scholar
38 Bramhall, , Works, i, p. xGoogle Scholar; Aylmer, G. E., The king’s servants: the civil service of Charles I, 1625–42 (London, 1974), p. 103.Google Scholar
39 Vesey, Athanasius Hibernicus, p. 27.
40 Bramhall, , Works, iii, 529.Google Scholar
41 Morrill, ‘British patriarchy?’, p. 224.
42 Vesey, Athanasius Hibernicus, p. 10.
43 Monili, ‘British patriarchy?’, p. 226.
44 McCafferty, ‘Bramhall’,p. 111.
45 Bramhall, , Works, ii, 295.Google Scholar
46 Ibid., pp 98–9.
47 Ibid., i, 577.
48 Ibid., ii, 43.
49 Ibid., pp 47–8.
50 Ibid., p. 48.
51 Ibid., i, 295.
52 Ibid., p. 199.
53 Ibid., ii, 453.
54 Ibid., p. 299.
55 Ibid., i, 100; iii, 557; v, 187.
56 Baillie, Robert, A review of the seditious pamphlet lately published in Holland by Dr. Bramhell pretended bishop of Londonderry (London, 1649), p. 5.Google Scholar
57 R. C., A brief survey of the lord of Derry (Paris, 1655), pp 141-2.Google Scholar
58 Bramhall, , Works, i, 96.Google Scholar
59 Ibid., p. 100.
60 George, C. H. and George, Katherine, The Protestant mind of the English Reformation, 1570–1640 (London, 1961), p. 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61 Aveling, J. C. H., Loades, D. M. and McAdoo, H. R., Rome and the Anglicans (Berlin, 1982), p. 166.Google Scholar
62 Hadden, , Works of Bramhall, iii, 545.Google Scholar
63 Ibid., p. 556.
64 Ibid., p. 557.
65 Bettenson, Henry(ed.), Documents of the Christian Church (2nd ed., Oxford, 1963), p. 135.Google Scholar
66 Hay, Denys, Europe in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries (London, 1989), p. 309.Google Scholar
67 Bettenson (ed.), Documents, p. 136.
68 Hillerbrand, H. J., The Oxford encyclopedia of the Reformation (4 vols, Oxford, 1996) i, 394-7Google Scholar. In fact, Rome still felt it necessary to deal with conciliarism as a living issue in 1870 at the First Vatican Council. Interestingly, it resurfaced at the Second Vatican Council, after Hans Kiing had published his book, Strukturen der Kirche (1962).
69 Oakley, Francis, ‘“Anxieties of influence”: Skinner, Figgis, conciliarism and early modern constitutionalism’ in Past and Present, no. 151 (May 1996), p. 81.Google Scholar
70 Hillerbrand, , Encylopedia, ii, 197-8.Google Scholar
71 Butler, Charles, The life of Hugo Grotius (London, 1826), p. 151.Google Scholar
72 Mackenzie, I. M., God’s order and natural law: the works of the Laudian divines (Aldershot, 2002).Google Scholar
73 Hadden, , Works of Bramhall, iii.Google Scholar
74 Ibid.
75 Ibid., pp 548–9.
76 Ibid., i, 101.
77 Ibid., p. 109.
78 Ibid.
79 Aveling, Loades and McAdoo, Rome and Anglicans, p. 275.
80 Milton, Anthony, Catholic and Reformed: the Roman and Protestant Churches in English Protestant thought, 1600–1640 (Cambridge, 1994), p. 371.Google Scholar
81 Bramhall, , Works, iii, 568-9.Google Scholar
82 Ibid.
83 Ibid., i, 100.
84 Ibid., iii, 545.
85 Ibid., p. 546.
86 Ibid., p. 539.
87 Ibid.
88 Morrill, John, The nature of the English revolution (London, 1993), p. 9.Google Scholar
89 Laud, , Works, vi, 262.Google Scholar
90 Ibid., p. 52.
91 Cal. S.P. Ire., 1625–33, p. 622.
92 Morrill, ‘British patriarchy?’, p. 209; B.L., Add. MS 34600, ff 172, 173, 179–80, 186. and cf. f. 133.
93 Morrill, ‘British patriarchy?’, p. 236.
94 Bramhall, , Works, i, 97.Google Scholar
95 Scott, and Bliss, , Works of Laud, vii, 291-3.Google Scholar
97 McCafferty, ‘“God bless your free Church of Ireland”’, p. 189.